f7ben Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 and down goes Slinger .....again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Highmark said: Our ruling Schweizer said, "Of the 13 (Bill) Clinton speeches that fetched $500,000 or more, only two occurred during the years his wife was not secretary of state." We're not checking Schweizer's suggestion that the increased speaking fees were part of a plan to curry favor in his wife's State Department. But on the specific numbers, Schweitzer is correct. Hillary Clinton’s financial disclosure forms from 2001 through the end of 2012 confirm Schweizer’s claim. We rate it True. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/26/peter-schweizer/fact-checking-clinton-cash-author-claim-about-bill/ 2010 -- Russia, $500,000, Renaissance Capital (Russian finance corporation) https://www.forbes.com/forbes/2008/0811/052.html https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2010-12-29/renaissance-capital-a-moscow-survivor https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html If Russia is so dangerous why did the Obama admin allow them to own 20% of US uranium mining rights? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Capital_(Russian_company) Renaissance Capital is an investment banking firm from Russia. It is a top-ranked investment bank for M&A, equity and debt capital markets, as well as securities sales and trading.[citation needed] Renaissance Capital is owned by Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov.[2] Nothing to see here. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/03/peter-schweizer-trump-vs-clintons-russia-ties-guess-who-always-got-free-pass.html Bill and Hillary Clinton received large sums of money directly and indirectly from Russian officials while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Bill Clinton was paid a cool $500,000 (well above his normal fee) for a speech in Moscow in 2010. Who footed the bill? An investment firm in Moscow called Renaissance Capital, which boasts deep ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation itself took money from Russian officials and Putin-connected oligarchs. They also took donations from: Viktor Vekselberg, a Putin confidant who gave through his company, Renova Group Andrey Vavilov, a former Russian government official who was Chairman of SuperOx, a research company that was part of the “nuclear Cluster” at the Russian government’s Skolkovo research facility Elena Baturina, the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow, who apparently gave them money through JSC Inteco, an entity that she controls Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium. Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal. Edited July 10, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Highmark said: If Russia is so dangerous why did the Obama admin allow them to own 20% of US uranium mining rights? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renaissance_Capital_(Russian_company) Renaissance Capital is an investment banking firm from Russia. It is a top-ranked investment bank for M&A, equity and debt capital markets, as well as securities sales and trading.[citation needed] Renaissance Capital is owned by Russian billionaire Mikhail Prokhorov.[2] Nothing to see here. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/03/03/peter-schweizer-trump-vs-clintons-russia-ties-guess-who-always-got-free-pass.html Bill and Hillary Clinton received large sums of money directly and indirectly from Russian officials while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Bill Clinton was paid a cool $500,000 (well above his normal fee) for a speech in Moscow in 2010. Who footed the bill? An investment firm in Moscow called Renaissance Capital, which boasts deep ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation itself took money from Russian officials and Putin-connected oligarchs. They also took donations from: Viktor Vekselberg, a Putin confidant who gave through his company, Renova Group Andrey Vavilov, a former Russian government official who was Chairman of SuperOx, a research company that was part of the “nuclear Cluster” at the Russian government’s Skolkovo research facility Elena Baturina, the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow, who apparently gave them money through JSC Inteco, an entity that she controls Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium. Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal. No smoke here.... Edited July 10, 2017 by Snake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 did anyone really believe highmark would stick to the bet? I mean how much more proof does one need? what a fucking coward. trump jr meets with Russians, in secret at the time, to get dirt on Clinton during the campaign. denies and lies about it for months, and then finally admits. this is the very definition of collusion with Russia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 uranium one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: did anyone really believe highmark would stick to the bet? I mean how much more proof does one need? what a fucking coward. trump jr meets with Russians, in secret at the time, to get dirt on Clinton during the campaign. denies and lies about it for months, and then finally admits. this is the very definition of collusion with Russia What ever happened to "the investigation is just starting, let the process play out" You are a hack to the maximum max. End of story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jtssrx Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Snoslinger said: uranium one This is why you have zero credibility. An honest person would admit the Uranium One deal is a black eye for Hillary. Even the New York times had to admit the story is true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 How many times has the smoking gun misfired? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said: What ever happened to "the investigation is just starting, let the process play out" You are a hack to the maximum max. End of story. so evidence, even in the form of admission by one in the party, means nothing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, jtssrx said: This is why you have zero credibility. An honest person would admit the Uranium One deal is a black eye for Hillary. Even the New York times had to admit the story is true. how many people, including republicans, had to approve that entire process? with the need to get dirt on Hillary by the repukes, why wouldn't they have jumped on this immediately, at the time, or right after? hint: it was all legal, by the book, and approved by dems and repukes. sbyl. this is just another fine example of you nitwits getting gut hooked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 6 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: so evidence, even in the form of admission by one in the party, means nothing? Evidence that trump colluded with the russians to alter the election is what the evidence needs to prove. So far there is none. When there is we will throw Trump out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, AKIQPilot said: Evidence that trump colluded with the russians to alter the election is what the evidence needs to prove. So far there is none. When there is we will throw Trump out. um, no, that was not the bet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, f7ben said: sweet fuck is Ivanka hot , just gorgeous The fake tits were a nice add Edited July 10, 2017 by Momorider Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 I like the "alter the election" part. is that the next "line of defense" tom? did you read that while taking your morning breitbart? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: um, no, that was not the bet. That was my interpretation of the bet. But your bet is with Highmark not me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: I like the "alter the election" part. is that the next "line of defense" tom? did you read that while taking your morning breitbart? Well what does collusion mean then? What is the collusion part if it wasn't to alter the election? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: did anyone really believe highmark would stick to the bet? I mean how much more proof does one need? what a fucking coward. trump jr meets with Russians, in secret at the time, to get dirt on Clinton during the campaign. denies and lies about it for months, and then finally admits. this is the very definition of collusion with Russia I've provided proof of a Dem Senator who was in closed meetings with Comey and other top intelligence officials stating there is no collusion found to date. You got a news article. Edited July 10, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said: That was my interpretation of the bet. But your bet is with Highmark not me. I posted exactly what the bet was Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 1 minute ago, Highmark said: I've provided proof of a Dem Senator who was in closed meetings with Comey and other top intelligence officials stating there is no collusion found to date. You got a news article. I have an admission from Donald jr as to what he was doing. call it a news article or anything else you like, it doesn't change the fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: I posted exactly what the bet was Explain collusion then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 Just now, Snoslinger said: I have an admission from Donald jr as to what he was doing. call it a news article or anything else you like, it doesn't change the fact. Jr openly admitted collusion....he used that exact word? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKIQPilot Posted July 10, 2017 Share Posted July 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: I have an admission from Donald jr as to what he was doing. call it a news article or anything else you like, it doesn't change the fact. You have no such thing. Not even close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 10, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 10, 2017 (edited) Merely taking a meeting is not cooperation or conspiracy. Something would have had to RESULT from the meeting creating that. col·lu·sion kəˈlo͞oZHən/ noun secret or illegal cooperation or conspiracy, especially in order to cheat or deceive others. Another definition not supported by the meeting. No agreement or cooperation took place. Definition of collusion : secret agreement or cooperation especially for an illegal or deceitful purpose acting incollusion with the enemy Edited July 10, 2017 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: Explain collusion then. I already did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 10, 2017 Author Share Posted July 10, 2017 2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said: You have no such thing. Not even close. http://www.npr.org/2017/07/09/536345533/trump-son-admits-to-meeting-russian-lawyer-with-offer-of-helpful-info-for-campai Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.