FBI not recommending charges against Clinton

[Capt.Storm]

this was meant for momo.

Edited July 6, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[Capt.Storm]

3 minutes ago, Highmark said:

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/surviving_a_multitude_of_fools.html#ixzz4De8P2s4C 
 

Not so sure I agree anymore if Hillary is voted in.   She may be an equal or greater threat than the idiots who vote in a liar like her.  

Well like I said I truly believe we have the farthest right and left candidates of all time ...America will speak in Nov.

[Highmark]

Just now, Capt.Storm said:

Well like I said I truly believe we have the farthest right and left candidates of all time ...America will speak in Nov.

I completely disagree.   Trump is not far right by any way shape or form.   Neither was Romney or McCain.  

[Capt.Storm]

Just now, Highmark said:

I completely disagree.   Trump is not far right by any way shape or form.   Neither was Romney or McCain.  

Well that's your opinion.

[Highmark]

12 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said:

Well that's your opinion.

[Capt.Storm]

2 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Who would be father right then trump?

[Cold War]

20 minutes ago, Highmark said:

"The danger to America is not Barack Obama, but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency. It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools, such as those who made him their president."

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/11/surviving_a_multitude_of_fools.html#ixzz4De8P2s4C 
 

Not so sure I agree anymore if Hillary is voted in.   She may be an equal or greater threat than the idiots who vote in a liar like her.  

Been saying this for years.

The majority of Americans don't care that she is a liar, the polls prove it.

They find her dishonest, yet they still plan to vote for her.

 

 

[Capt.Storm]

5 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Been saying this for years.

The majority of Americans don't care that she is a liar, the polls prove it.

They find her dishonest, yet they still plan to vote for her.

 

 

To be fair,

 

Could it also be they are afraid of trump for various reasons?

Edited July 6, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[Mainecat]

1 hour ago, Highmark said:

http://www.salon.com/2015/05/31/the_cash_donations_hillary_simply_has_no_answer_for_partner/

Among all the rivers of money that have flowed to the Clinton family, one seems to raise the biggest national security questions of all: the stream of cash that came from 20 foreign governments who relied on weapons export approvals from Hillary Clinton’s State Department.

Federal law designates the secretary of state as “responsible for the continuous supervision and general direction of sales” of arms, military hardware and services to foreign countries. In practice, that meant that Clinton was charged with rejecting or approving weapons deals — and when it came to Clinton Foundation donors, Hillary Clinton’s State Department did a whole lot of approving.

While Clinton was secretary of state, her department approved $165 billion worth of commercial arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors. That figure from Clinton’s three full fiscal years in office is almost double the value of arms sales to those countries during the same period of President George W. Bush’s second term.

The Clinton-led State Department also authorized $151 billion of separate Pentagon-brokered deals for 16 of the countries that gave to the Clinton Foundation. That was a 143 percent increase in completed sales to those nations over the same time frame during the Bush administration. The 143 percent increase in U.S. arms sales to Clinton Foundation donors compares to an 80 percent increase in such sales to all countries over the same time period.

American military contractors and their affiliates that donated to the Clinton Foundation — and in some cases, helped finance speaking fees to Bill Clinton — also got in on the action. Those firms and their subsidiaries were listed as contractors in $163 billion worth of arms deals authorized by the Clinton State Department.

Under a directive signed by President Clinton in 1995, the State Department is supposed to take foreign governments’ human rights records into account when reviewing arms deals. Yet, Hillary Clinton’s State Department increased approvals of such deals to Clinton Foundation donors that her own agency was sharply criticizing for systematic human rights abuses.

More dribble. Yup the Clintons themselves sold arms to enemies......lmao

Come on Congress had to approve of it.

Fro cripes sakes your not this stupid.

[Mainecat]

[Capt.Storm]

16 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

More dribble. Yup the Clintons themselves sold arms to enemies......lmao

Come on Congress had to approve of it.

Fro cripes sakes your not this stupid.

https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/weapons/RL31675.pdf

 

I wonder if the shipments are under these amounts?

 

Congress must be formally notified 30 calendar days before the Administration can take the final steps to conclude a government-to-government foreign military sale of major defense equipment valued at $14 million or more, defense articles or services valued at $50 million or more, or design and construction services valued at $200 million or more.

Furthermore, commercially licensed arms sales cases involving defense articles that are firearmscontrolled under category I of the United States Munitions List and valued at $1 million or more must also be formally notified to Congress for review 30 days prior to the license for export being approved. In the case of proposed licenses for such sales to NATO members, Japan, Australia, South Korea, Israel, or New Zealand, 15 days prior notification is required.

 

But the amounts talked about it would seem that congress approved it all.

 

Edited July 6, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[Capt.Storm]

oh boy..

 

Clinton State Department approved U.S. weapons shipment to Libya despite ban

The State Department initially approved a weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.

The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.

At least one of those shipments, kept in a file marked “arms deal,” was supposed to come from Dolarian Capital Inc. of Fresno, California, according to an end use certificate from the State Department’s office of defense trade controls licensing that was contained in the file.

The shipment was to include rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns and 8 million rounds of ammunition, much of it new and inexpensive hardware originally produced in the former Soviet bloc of Eastern Europe, according to an itemized list included in the end use certificate.

Dolarian Capital, part of a small network of U.S. arms merchants that has worked with U.S. intelligence, confirmed one of its licensing requests to ship weapons via Kuwait to Libya was approved by the State Department in spring 2011 and then inexplicably revoked before the armaments were sent

 

.http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/20/hillary-clinton-state-department-approved-us-weapo/

 

 

[Momorider]

And predictably MaineCUNT attempts to deflect  

[racer254]

9 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said:

oh boy..

 

Clinton State Department approved U.S. weapons shipment to Libya despite ban

The State Department initially approved a weapons shipment from a California company to Libyans seeking to oust Moammar Gadhafi in 2011 even though a United Nations arms ban was in place, according to memos recovered from the burned-out compound in Benghazi.

The documents, obtained by The Washington Times, show U.S. diplomats at the Benghazi compound were keeping track of several potential U.S.-sanctioned shipments to allies, one or more of which were destined for the Transitional National Council, the Libyan movement that was seeking to oust Gadhafi and form a new government.

At least one of those shipments, kept in a file marked “arms deal,” was supposed to come from Dolarian Capital Inc. of Fresno, California, according to an end use certificate from the State Department’s office of defense trade controls licensing that was contained in the file.

The shipment was to include rocket launchers, grenade launchers, 7,000 machine guns and 8 million rounds of ammunition, much of it new and inexpensive hardware originally produced in the former Soviet bloc of Eastern Europe, according to an itemized list included in the end use certificate.

Dolarian Capital, part of a small network of U.S. arms merchants that has worked with U.S. intelligence, confirmed one of its licensing requests to ship weapons via Kuwait to Libya was approved by the State Department in spring 2011 and then inexplicably revoked before the armaments were sent

 

.http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/oct/20/hillary-clinton-state-department-approved-us-weapo/

 

 

But the US needs sensible gun control laws according some here.  FFS.

[Capt.Storm]

Just now, racer254 said:

But the US needs sensible gun control laws according some here.  FFS.

YEP!

You see,they just know we can't handle the truth.

[Capt.Storm]

We are just little worker ants in their minds.

They must hate elections.

Edited July 6, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[Mainecat]

1 hour ago, racer254 said:

But the US needs sensible gun control laws according some here.  FFS.

Its pure bullshit

[Mainecat]

It must suck to be a republican these years....really pathetic candidates

[Mainecat]

1 hour ago, Momorider said:

And predictably MaineCUNT attempts to deflect  

Skupper faced flem boy says what?

[Capt.Storm]

1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

It must suck to be a republican these years....really pathetic candidates

What really sucks is all the religious bs that still goes on in the world yet today.

[racer254]

1 minute ago, Mainecat said:

Its pure bullshit

Do you have a link to disprove it?  If it is bullshit, then let's not continue with the crap, but at least prove it.

 

[Capt.Storm]

1 minute ago, racer254 said:

Do you have a link to disprove it?  If it is bullshit, then let's not continue with the crap, but at least prove it.

 

Hell you gota figure the repubs are going to be ok with gun sales over there.

The shocker is it's the dems pushing it?

[Momorider]

31 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Skupper faced flem boy says what?

What's that hacker mchackerson you pathetic fucking hack  

[Mainecat]

1 hour ago, Momorider said:

What's that hacker mchackerson you pathetic fucking hack  

Shut up you bilge drinking, feces laden, buck toothed, google eyed Canadian

[racer254]

1 hour ago, Capt.Storm said:

Hell you gota figure the repubs are going to be ok with gun sales over there.

The shocker is it's the dems pushing it?

No, that isn't a shocker at all to me.   Both sides try to arm people in other countries, the only people surprised are people who keep voting for dems thinking that dems are NOT doing it like mc.