Sanctuary cities WIN...for now.

[Zambroski]

It's unfuckingbelieveable.

Federal laws don't apply to cities unless they want them too.  The 9th is god damn leftist train wreck.  That's ok...it's temporary.  And this is more winning for the R's down the line.  Americans do not want this to be the worlds fucking playground.  Tucker is OWNING some fuck wad from California about it right now...it's hilarious.  And he just sits there with a nice smug look.  Too funny.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/25/california-judge-blocks-trump-order-on-sanctuary-city-money.html

 

[Ez ryder]

there is a reason FOX is kicking ass on CNN and MSNBC combined . 

[Zambroski]

1 minute ago, Ez ryder said:

there is a reason FOX is kicking ass on CNN and MSNBC combined . 

And it's going to continue......and grow.  The lefties are gonna start attacking Fox even more when they realize their idiocy is only selling their current clients.  Fox viewers are digging in.....and not fucking budging.  Let's settle this with a good old fashioned dust up!

[Ez ryder]

9 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

And it's going to continue......and grow.  The lefties are gonna start attacking Fox even more when they realize their idiocy is only selling their current clients.  Fox viewers are digging in.....and not fucking budging.  Let's settle this with a good old fashioned dust up!

they may say they want to settle it like men . but what they really mean is more like this

 

 

 

 

 

[Zambroski]

Oh...I'm gonna make myself available for serious counseling.  These people can be helped...i just KNOW IT!

[spin_dry]

trump and republicans whine more about laws in this country than criminals. oh wait.....

[hwytohell]

Follow the money an you will see ...https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=William+Orrick   A bit more of the good old judge.....http://www.citizen.org/whitehouseforsale/bundler.cfm?Bundler=25478 

Edited April 26, 2017 by hwytohell

[Momorider]

4 hours ago, hwytohell said:

Follow the money an you will see ...https://www.opensecrets.org/donor-lookup/results?name=William+Orrick   A bit more of the good old judge.....http://www.citizen.org/whitehouseforsale/bundler.cfm?Bundler=25478 

Judge donates $200K to Barry  

[Anler]

14 hours ago, Zambroski said:

It's unfuckingbelieveable.

Federal laws don't apply to cities unless they want them too.  The 9th is god damn leftist train wreck.  That's ok...it's temporary.  And this is more winning for the R's down the line.  Americans do not want this to be the worlds fucking playground.  Tucker is OWNING some fuck wad from California about it right now...it's hilarious.  And he just sits there with a nice smug look.  Too funny.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/04/25/california-judge-blocks-trump-order-on-sanctuary-city-money.html

 

Laws are laws, right? Just like EPA laws. Just like speed limit laws. Youve got to OBEY THE LAW!!!111 

or you are a criminal and the govt takes all your stuff. Dont like it? Dont break the law!

[Highmark]

Federal govt has held funds under threats to the states on a number of occasions that the SC upheld.  Probably the most known one is highway funds and the DUI rules from .1 to .08 and seat belts.   I hope Trump takes this to the SC.   The Sanctuary Cities will lose for sure.  

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95275

 

President Clinton, after a three-year struggle with Congress, signed a bill today that would set a tough national standard for drunken driving and, according to proponents, prevent 500 highway deaths a year.

“For me this is a very good day for the United States,” the president said. He said the measure was “the biggest step to toughen drunk driving laws and reduce alcohol-related crashes since the national minimum drinking age was established a generation ago.”

The new law requires states to implement a 0.08 percent blood alcohol content standard as the legal level for drunken driving by 2004. States that fail to impose that standard would begin losing millions of dollars a year in federal highway funds.

The provision was tucked into a compromise $58 billion transportation spending bill that was stuffed with pre-election highway, mass transit and aviation projects for every state.

Clinton said the 0.08 standard was a “common-sense nationwide limit” that will save an estimated 500 lives a year and prevent thousands of injuries.

Social Drinkers Penalized?

A 170-pound man could consume approximately four drinks in an hour on an empty stomach before reaching 0.08 limit, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics cited by Mothers Against Drunk Driving. A 137-pound woman could have three drinks in an hour before reaching 0.08.

The president was joined in a Rose Garden ceremony by Millie Webb, national president of MADD, Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., and representatives of highway safety, civic and health organizations.

Opponents of the 0.08 standard, including the restaurant and alcohol industries, say the measure would penalize social drinkers while ignoring the bigger problem of repeat offenders who drink heavily.

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia already have 0.08 laws, and in Massachusetts a level of 0.08 is considered evidence but not proof of impairment. Thirty-one states define drunken driving as 0.10 percent blood alcohol content.

In 1999, 15,786 traffic deaths were attributed to drunken driving, including more than 2,200 children.

Overwhelming Passage

Mothers Against Drunk Driving cites studies showing that a driver with 0.08 blood alcohol content is 11 times more likely to be involved in a fatal collision than a sober driver.

The transportation bill’s overwhelming passage was fueled by its scores of road, mass transit and aviation projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars for districts from coast to coast.

To accommodate that, the measure was $7.3 billion higher than last year’s level, $3.3 billion more than Clinton requested and nearly $3 billion larger than earlier versions passed by the House and Senate.

That made room for $1.97 billion for specific highway projects that neither the Senate or House had approved earlier, including $600 million for a federally owned Potomac River bridge outside Washington, D.C.

There were also separate $100 million projects for West Virginia, Alabama and Mississippi — home states, respectively, of Sen. Robert Byrd, top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee; GOP Sen. Richard Shelby, chairman of the Appropriations transportation subcommittee; and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.

[spin_dry]

8 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Federal govt has held funds under threats to the states on a number of occasions that the SC upheld.  Probably the most known one is highway funds and the DUI rules from .1 to .08 and seat belts.   I hope Trump takes this to the SC.   The Sanctuary Cities will lose for sure.  

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95275

 

President Clinton, after a three-year struggle with Congress, signed a bill today that would set a tough national standard for drunken driving and, according to proponents, prevent 500 highway deaths a year.

“For me this is a very good day for the United States,” the president said. He said the measure was “the biggest step to toughen drunk driving laws and reduce alcohol-related crashes since the national minimum drinking age was established a generation ago.”

The new law requires states to implement a 0.08 percent blood alcohol content standard as the legal level for drunken driving by 2004. States that fail to impose that standard would begin losing millions of dollars a year in federal highway funds.

The provision was tucked into a compromise $58 billion transportation spending bill that was stuffed with pre-election highway, mass transit and aviation projects for every state.

Clinton said the 0.08 standard was a “common-sense nationwide limit” that will save an estimated 500 lives a year and prevent thousands of injuries.

Social Drinkers Penalized?

A 170-pound man could consume approximately four drinks in an hour on an empty stomach before reaching 0.08 limit, according to National Highway Traffic Safety Administration statistics cited by Mothers Against Drunk Driving. A 137-pound woman could have three drinks in an hour before reaching 0.08.

The president was joined in a Rose Garden ceremony by Millie Webb, national president of MADD, Transportation Secretary Rodney Slater, Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., and representatives of highway safety, civic and health organizations.

Opponents of the 0.08 standard, including the restaurant and alcohol industries, say the measure would penalize social drinkers while ignoring the bigger problem of repeat offenders who drink heavily.

Nineteen states and the District of Columbia already have 0.08 laws, and in Massachusetts a level of 0.08 is considered evidence but not proof of impairment. Thirty-one states define drunken driving as 0.10 percent blood alcohol content.

In 1999, 15,786 traffic deaths were attributed to drunken driving, including more than 2,200 children.

Overwhelming Passage

Mothers Against Drunk Driving cites studies showing that a driver with 0.08 blood alcohol content is 11 times more likely to be involved in a fatal collision than a sober driver.

The transportation bill’s overwhelming passage was fueled by its scores of road, mass transit and aviation projects worth hundreds of millions of dollars for districts from coast to coast.

To accommodate that, the measure was $7.3 billion higher than last year’s level, $3.3 billion more than Clinton requested and nearly $3 billion larger than earlier versions passed by the House and Senate.

That made room for $1.97 billion for specific highway projects that neither the Senate or House had approved earlier, including $600 million for a federally owned Potomac River bridge outside Washington, D.C.

There were also separate $100 million projects for West Virginia, Alabama and Mississippi — home states, respectively, of Sen. Robert Byrd, top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee; GOP Sen. Richard Shelby, chairman of the Appropriations transportation subcommittee; and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott.

lose for sure.   i keep hearing that. 

[Highmark]

1 minute ago, spin_dry said:

lose for sure.   i keep hearing that. 

Have they taken one to the SC yet?   Didn't think so.  It will happen now that Scalia has been replaced.  

Edited April 26, 2017 by Highmark