Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

poor donny


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, oleroule said:

how does the eo violate the constitution?

Judge Robart probed a Justice Department lawyer on what he called the "litany of harms" suffered by Washington state's universities, and also questioned the administration's use of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States as a justification for the ban.

Robart said no attacks had been carried out on U.S. soil by individuals from the seven countries affected by the travel ban since that assault. For Trump's order to be constitutional, Robart said, it had to be "based in fact, as opposed to fiction."

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/03/seattle-federal-judge-grants-temporary-restraining-order-on-immigration-ban-on-nationwide-basis.html

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICEMAN! said:

Judge Robart probed a Justice Department lawyer on what he called the "litany of harms" suffered by Washington state's universities, and also questioned the administration's use of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States as a justification for the ban.

Robart said no attacks had been carried out on U.S. soil by individuals from the seven countries affected by the travel ban since that assault. For Trump's order to be constitutional, Robart said, it had to be "based in fact, as opposed to fiction."

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/02/03/seattle-federal-judge-grants-temporary-restraining-order-on-immigration-ban-on-nationwide-basis.html

 

swing and miss...not looking for a cut and paste article that explains zip (yes, i did read it)

that doesn't explain why it is unconstitutional.

 "based in fact, as opposed to fiction."  doesn't mean a thing.

what part of the constitution makes the eo invalid?

in your own words.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, oleroule said:

swing and miss...not looking for a cut and paste article that explains zip (yes, i did read it)

that doesn't explain why it is unconstitutional.

 "based in fact, as opposed to fiction."  doesn't mean a thing.

what part of the constitution makes the eo invalid?

in your own words.

Nah, the Judge's comments on his decision are sufficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Nah, the Judge's comments on his decision are sufficient.

too bad you can't think for yourself....typical liberal.

i was hoping one of you guys could put together a coherent argument for once.

at least you don't post stupid memes from duhundergound like your pal mc.

Edited by oleroule
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

i don't work with ptsd. do you make these type of wild assumptions in business? 

I don't need to make assumptions about what a pathetic fraud you are, you show it  on a regular basis,   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...