NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 4 minutes ago, ACE said: Because you quite literally can’t refute it Lap up that turd boy, lap it up! Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: Lap up that turd boy, lap it up! Neal Yes that’s exactly what you did Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 10 minutes ago, irv said: Have any links or are you conflicted thinking it was him when it was actually the National Geographic who had to retract and apologize for their fake news story about the dying Polar bear? https://archive.is/sj2ZZ Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 6 minutes ago, ACE said: Yes that’s exactly what you did No, I went and looked at his claims, and what data he used, and how it is manipulated by both sides. SBYL. Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 12 minutes ago, irv said: Have any links or are you conflicted thinking it was him when it was actually the National Geographic who had to retract and apologize for their fake news story about the dying Polar bear? Looks like nasa has retracted their own data too so I guess they’re crap by his standards 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: No, I went and looked at his claims, and what data he used, and how it is manipulated by both sides. SBYL. Neal His analysis is a lot more accurate according to the science Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irv Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said: https://archive.is/sj2ZZ Neal You're not really this gullible and stupid, are you, Neal??? Holy fuck, dude, have anymore of these great reliable, factual news sources kicking around. LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate ThinkProgress Left biased based on story selection that always favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting based on a few failed fact checks. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/think-progress/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 26 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said: https://archive.is/sj2ZZ Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted February 21, 2020 Author Share Posted February 21, 2020 23 minutes ago, irv said: You're not really this gullible and stupid, are you, Neal??? Holy fuck, dude, have anymore of these great reliable, factual news sources kicking around. LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate ThinkProgress Left biased based on story selection that always favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting based on a few failed fact checks. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/think-progress/ Think progress??? Lmao holy eff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, ACE said: Think progress??? Lmao holy eff You’d think he could come with unbiased source like green peace or Albore,,,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 57 minutes ago, irv said: So you have no clue,,,,,,,,other than "you heard" he was proven to be a fraud? That's some solid facts you have there, Neal. Keeping in mind that Tony Heller and Steve Godard are the same person would you accept Judith Curry referring to his methods as “crackpotty” as sufficient to discredit Mr. Heller as a reliable source? “Further, I think there was an element of ‘boy who cried wolf’ – Goddard has been wrong before, and the comments at Goddard’s blog can be pretty crackpotty.” https://judithcurry.com/2014/06/28/skeptical-of-skeptics-is-steve-goddard-right/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XC.Morrison Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 (edited) Anthony Watts (Comment #130003) June 6th, 2014 at 8:00 am I took Goddard to task over this as well in a private email, saying he was very wrong and needed to do better. I also pointed out to him that his initial claim was wronger than wrong, as he was claiming that 40% of USCHN STATIONS were missing. Predictably, he swept that under the rug, and then proceeded to tell me in email that I don’t know what I’m talking about. Fortunately I saved screen caps from his original post and the edit he made afterwards. See: Before: http://wattsupwiththat.files.w.....before.png After: http://wattsupwiththat.files.w....._after.png Note the change in wording in the highlighted last sentence. In case you didn’t know, “Steve Goddard” is a made up name. Supposedly at Heartland ICCC9 he’s going to “out” himself and start using his real name. That should be interesting to watch, I won’t be anywhere near that moment of his. This, combined with his inability to openly admit to and correct mistakes, is why I booted him from WUWT some years ago, after he refused to admit that his claim about CO2 freezing on the surface of Antarctica couldn’t be possible due to partial pressure of CO2. http://wattsupwiththat.com/200.....a-at-113f/ And then when we had an experiment done, he still wouldn’t admit to it. http://wattsupwiththat.com/200.....-possible/ And when I pointed out his recent stubborness over the USHCN issues was just like that…he posts this: http://stevengoddard.wordpress.....reeze-co2/ He’s hopelessly stubborn. Edited February 21, 2020 by XC.Morrison Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 7 hours ago, irv said: You're not really this gullible and stupid, are you, Neal??? Holy fuck, dude, have anymore of these great reliable, factual news sources kicking around. LEFT BIAS These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources. Overall, we rate ThinkProgress Left biased based on story selection that always favors the left and Mixed for factual reporting based on a few failed fact checks. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/think-progress/ If ore the statement from Tony if you wish, your choice. His words are there. Think progress is far more reliable than Tony Heller... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 7 hours ago, Sleepr2 said: You find Tony's own words unsatisfactory? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 7 hours ago, ACE said: Think progress??? Lmao holy eff You find Tony's own words unsatisfactory? Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 7 hours ago, Sleepr2 said: You’d think he could come with unbiased source like green peace or Albore,,,,, Tony's own words are in the post. Ignore them if you wish, ignorance is bliss they say... Neal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NaturallyAspirated Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 7 hours ago, XC.Morrison said: Keeping in mind that Tony Heller and Steve Godard are the same person would you accept Judith Curry referring to his methods as “crackpotty” as sufficient to discredit Mr. Heller as a reliable source? “Further, I think there was an element of ‘boy who cried wolf’ – Goddard has been wrong before, and the comments at Goddard’s blog can be pretty crackpotty.” https://judithcurry.com/2014/06/28/skeptical-of-skeptics-is-steve-goddard-right/ Haha, Tony gets a spanking there, wow. Neal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.