Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

More goodies for the TDS lunitics


Pete

Recommended Posts

President Trump signed the historic United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, replacing the Clinton-era North American Free Trade Agreement that he called a "disaster."

Continue Reading Below

 

The USMCA, which is the biggest trade deal of all-time, covers more than $1.3 trillion of commerce, and is the second major trade deal secured by the Trump administration this year. The agreement has already been ratified by Mexico, but not yet by Canada.

"You're going to see more jobs all across the economy, in the automobile sector, in the agricultural sector and of course in the energy sector as well," Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette told FOX Business' Maria Bartiromo on Wednesday.

USMCA IS 'GOLD STANDARD FOR DIGITAL TRADE': TRADE CHIEF ROBERT LIGHTHIZER

 

The USMCA requires 75 percent of automobile components be manufactured in the United States, Canada or Mexico in order to avoid tariffs. By 2023, some 40 to 45 percent of automobile parts must be made by workers who earn at least $16 an hour.

Image 1 of 6

President Donald Trump, joined by from left, Senior adviser to the President, Ivanka Trump, Vice President Mike Pence, House Minority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy of Calif., and others, signs a new North American trade agreement with Canada and Mexico, during an event at the White House, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2020, in Washington. (AP Photo/ Evan Vucci)

 

The agreement is expected to create 80,000 new jobs tied to the auto industry and bring in up to $30 billion of new investment in the sector. The pact will also open new markets for American wheat, poultry and eggs, among other things.

"This is a colossal victory for our farmers and ranchers," Trump said at the signing ceremony. "Everybody said this was a deal that could not be done," he added, "but we got it done."

Once fully implemented, the USMCA is expected to lift U.S. gross domestic product by as many as 1.2 percentage points and create up to 589,000 jobs, according to the International Trade Commission.

After the trade deal was approved by the Senate on Jan. 16, by a vote of 89 to 10, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, hailed it as a "major achievement for President Trump and a very big win for the American people."

The signing of the USMCA comes nearly two weeks after Trump inked an initial trade deal with China. Combined, the two agreements encompass more than $2 trillion worth of trade and could add as much as 1.7 percentage points to U.S. economic growth. The U.S. economy expanded at a 2.1 percent pace in the three months through September.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

“We’re restoring America’s industrial might like never before,” Trump declared at a campaign rally in Wildwood, N.J., on Tuesday evening. “They’re all coming back. They want to be where the action is.”

 

https://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/trump-signs-usmca-job-market-boom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frenchy said:

what exactly is historic about it? The fact that 'The worst trade deal ever' was updated with a few minor tweaks?

Doesn't really sound historic to me. Maybe Pete can shed some light.

You won't get an intellectual response.  Just a tds type slurping 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, frenchy said:

you know it's bad when even dripper is lurking but not posting :lol:  

I got busy at work

All I know is you guys bitch about not doing anything and when he does you still do :lol:

kind of like his deficit spending is so horrible even though any alternative is so much worse :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll just leave this here....

the United States International Trade Commission, a government body, released an independent analysis of the accord’s potential effects on the country’s economy, a report required by law before Congress voted on the deal.

The report found that the agreement would increase gross domestic product by 0.35 percent after inflation, or $68.2 billion, and create 175,700 jobs — fewer than the economy has recently produced in a single month, on average. It would increase United States trade with Canada and Mexico by about 5 percent, as well as provide a modest lift to agriculture, services and manufacturing activity.

“In light of the size of the U.S. economy relative to the size of the Mexican and Canadian economies, as well as the reduction in tariff and nontariff barriers that has already taken place among the three countries under Nafta, the impact of the agreement on the U.S. economy is likely to be moderate,” the commission said.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, washedupmxer said:

Oh and I know words like tremendously, historical etc really bother you but if you think of him as more of a used car salesman than a president it's much easier to take lol 

he didn't say it. Fox News did. :dunno: 

So fake news or no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frenchy said:

I'll just leave this here....

the United States International Trade Commission, a government body, released an independent analysis of the accord’s potential effects on the country’s economy, a report required by law before Congress voted on the deal.

The report found that the agreement would increase gross domestic product by 0.35 percent after inflation, or $68.2 billion, and create 175,700 jobs — fewer than the economy has recently produced in a single month, on average. It would increase United States trade with Canada and Mexico by about 5 percent, as well as provide a modest lift to agriculture, services and manufacturing activity.

“In light of the size of the U.S. economy relative to the size of the Mexican and Canadian economies, as well as the reduction in tariff and nontariff barriers that has already taken place among the three countries under Nafta, the impact of the agreement on the U.S. economy is likely to be moderate,” the commission said.

So it's positive just not positive enough? 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, washedupmxer said:

Adjectives and exaggerations aren't the flat out lies I generally like to call fake news.

You still say there is no fake news or have you come around? 

 

I never said that. I said it isn't the issue some make it out to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, washedupmxer said:

I think you did

Oh it's an issue. I know you think I'm dumb but at least I can differentiate a good part of Americans can't and that's the scary part 

American 'news' is bad. Far worse than in other countries. The lines have been blurred so much between opinion and factual reporting it's really hard for many to decipher or even realize the difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frenchy said:

American 'news' is bad. Far worse than in other countries. The lines have been blurred so much between opinion and factual reporting it's really hard for many to decipher or even realize the difference.

Is nowhere near as bad if you go find your own vs having it fed to you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...