Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Clinton seizes historic primary win


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GGNHL said:

 

Yeah a woman who rode her husband's coattails, last name, and reputation to the democratic party nomination. I'm sure little girls everywhere will look up to her and say "I can lie, cheat, and steal, but as long as I marry the right man I can be president one day as well!" :lol::snack:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
3 hours ago, Mileage Psycho said:

I'll bet you feel the same way about Trump's suits LOL

Trump doesn't go around claiming the things she does.   Big difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

Franken the taxdodger that bankrupted a childrens charity?

As with all democrats, Franken blamed that on someone else.  Personal responsibility does not apply to the left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, oleroule said:

dumbocrat primary turnout....way way down.

repubic primary turnout...way way up.

this will be a problem for the dems in the general.

the excitement just isn't there.

 

The fraudulent votes are not there either.

Dead people turnout was way down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bitch can't be honest about anything...............She thanks & applauds Sanders for running against her.

She welcomes the investigation into her time as SOS.

I don't care if you are the most innocent person on the planet, you don't look forward to a criminal investigation.

Edited by Cold War
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cold War said:

The bitch can't be honest about anything...............She thanks & applauds Sanders for running against her.

She welcomes the investigation into her time as SOS.

I don't care if you are the most innocent person on the planet, you don't look forward to a criminal investigation.

She says one thing, but proceeds with another.  It constantly fools her supporters.  They can then say "they didn't find anything" or "what laws did she break"  It is dishonest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, racer254 said:

She says one thing, but proceeds with another.  It constantly fools her supporters.  They can then say "they didn't find anything" or "what laws did she break"  It is dishonest

It is the typical politician bullshit double speak some Republicans and independents are sick of.

" once all the facts and information are out, I will be fully exonerated "

Then stonewall & try to suppress evidence.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, racer254 said:

She says one thing, but proceeds with another.  It constantly fools her supporters.  They can then say "they didn't find anything" or "what laws did she break"  It is dishonest

Yes..deflect and confuse!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oleroule said:

she keeps throwing out the nothing was 'marked' classified line

the dumb cunt should know EVERYTHING she did as sos was classified.

She only used that email so it was never not @clinton.org and the fact anyone expects even the stupidest of stupid to believe she never dealt with classified material for her entire tenure :lmao: it's almost comical if it wasn't so criminal 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...