Snake Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tdRgQi5yPU Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted August 2, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 2, 2016 She's a snake....a very calculating and deliberate snake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 2 minutes ago, Skidooski said: She's a snake....a very calculating and deliberate snake Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 (edited) I made a mistake..I won't do it again. She knew what she was doing..make no mistake about that. FOIL. Edited August 2, 2016 by Capt.Storm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 2, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 2, 2016 Can one of you fella's let me know when the trial starts and she's being tried for.... Thanks - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt.Storm Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 1 minute ago, SnowRider said: Can one of you fella's let me know when the trial starts and she's being tried for.... Thanks - you know she's guilty. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 2, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 2, 2016 Wow...according to the forum clown posse she's been guilty of something for 40 years. I wonder how many people are in on the cover up? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 2 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Can one of you fella's let me know when the trial starts and she's being tried for.... Thanks - Sometime after January 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 2, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Momorider said: Sometime after January 2017 I wonder if she will have a chance to nominate Obama to the Supreme Court by then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snake Posted August 2, 2016 Author Share Posted August 2, 2016 Now you need a trial and conviction to be a liar. That's how far the liberals will go; and they call others gullible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted August 2, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted August 2, 2016 1 minute ago, Snake said: Now you need a trial and conviction to be a liar. That's how far the liberals will go; and they call others gullible. Do not confuse your opinion for fact....as your R's have spent millions chasing her ghost....and what do they have to show for it? . Some lil hypocritical union delivery boy confusing his opinion for fact Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 5 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Do not confuse your opinion for fact....as your R's have spent millions chasing her ghost....and what do they have to show for it? . Some lil hypocritical union delivery boy confusing his opinion for fact Fact is she is a lying CUNT, only the ultra gullible and stupid like you don't know this reality you fucking socialist POS 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XCR1250 Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 Maybe it's because she has gotten away with it for so long, but Hillary Clinton seems to get more brazen in her mendacity as she gets closer to the White House. Case in point is her interview with Chris Wallace on Fox News over the weekend. At one point, Wallace asks Clinton about claims she made about her use of a private, unsecured email server while secretary of state, which the FBI investigation determined were completely false. Wallace shows clips where Clinton says things like: "I did not email any classified material to anyone," and "I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time," and "I had not sent classified material nor received anything marked classified." Note the subtle change in language between the first and last claim, which Clinton had to modify after thousands of emails turned up that the State Department determined to contain classified information. But it was all a lie. As FBI Director James Comey pointed out at his press briefing, out of the 30,000 emails Clinton turned over, 110 contain "classified information at the time they were sent or received.Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent." (Emphasis added.) Among the thousands of work emails Clinton failed to turn over -- despite her repeated statements that she had turned over everything -- "three were classified at the time they were sent or received." When Comey testified at a Congressional hearing about his findings, Rep. Trey Gowdy asked him point-blank where Clinton was being truthful in her claims. "That's not true," he said. So what was Clinton's response when Wallace confronted her with her own quotes, as well as Comey's statement? "Director Comey said my answers were truthful," she told Wallace. Let that sink in for a minute. Her lie was so blatant that even the Washington Post's in-house fact checker awarded Clinton "Four Pinocchios" -- aka "whoppers." In her interview with Wallace, Clinton went on to blame the 300 people she emailed with, some of whom, she said, "made the wrong call" when it came to handling classified material. But Comey had blown up that defense as well, saying at his press briefing that she and anyone in her position "should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation," adding that "even if information is not marked 'classified' in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it." In other words, one of those people who "made the wrong call" was Clinton herself, since she authored some of the classified emails she sent from her unsecured private email server, and should have known better. Her statement to Wallace that "I take classification seriously" looks like just another lie. Clinton defenders will no doubt respond to this by saying that "At this point, what difference does it make?" The FBI let Clinton off the hook. Only her Clinton-hating Republicans critics won't let it go. But criminal or not, Clinton's actions when she was secretary of state -- and her lies and obfuscations about it since -- are about judgment, honesty and trustworthiness, which are baseline qualifications for being president. As she demonstrated again over the weekend, Clinton glaringly lacks any of these qualities. by Taboola Sponsored Links You May Like Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oleroule Posted August 2, 2016 Share Posted August 2, 2016 3 hours ago, SnowRider said: Can one of you fella's let me know when the trial starts and she's being tried for.... Thanks - nov 8. for being a lying corrupt cunt. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.