revkev6

there's great riding in jackman... and you and woolie could smoke weed and have some epic convos.... maybe sell tickets

but you would be the guy to turn it around... 180 degree policy shift... hug and hold your oppressed brethren https://globalnews.ca/news/3977463/maine-town-manager-white-majority-atlantic-canada/?utm_source=GlobalSaskatoon&utm_medium=Facebook

that's actually a great idea... I hear there is a newly vacated position in jackman maine he would be PERFECT to fill the shoes of

that's your opinion of what he said. All I said from the beginning is Humans are biologically predisposed to be part of a hierarchy. nothing more or less. you are the one putting terms and words in my mouth. I think you are stretching point number two a little. unjustified is a little broad and authority is not necessarily bad. three also, oversimplified. it's on the level of a 1st grader. but lets say that's a yes.

do you go to downtown detroit and invite all the oppressed onto your boat so they know what white privilege really is??

I work with several polish people. most are direct polish immigrants. they have become citizens, they love america and some of them love debating politics as much as any here. guy in the next office over loves him some hillary and it makes me sick.. nice guy though. I don't know the direct path but I do know it's attainable.

yes, he mentions it specifically because he disagrees with it. obviously, this would have to happen. i'm talking what checks and balances in this society stop one from taking advantage of a system. your arguments always make me want to call you piggy

no, I'd say your last 8 pages of arguing are all for not... because the guy said nothing about any specific types of hierarchy in the blip of interview shown there. you put words and arguments in that were not relevant to the conversation then we can agree that hierarchy and social interaction are a human requirement one way or another. pack animals with a pack mentality. just look at this place. whats your anarchists solution for this society where all are equal yet not equal

not at all where did I put words in your mouth?? ok, thats fine. but why are you going off all unhinged on this guy then?? his point has nothing to do with any "type of" or reasoning for a hierarchy. he says, human biology is wired to be in them, and the higher we are in them the happier we generally are. the last bit I will slightly disagree with, as my personal experience has shown that some people have a roll or level that they are comfortable filling. put them above that level and their happiness decreases. regardless, that argument is not part of our discussion. so lets get back to debate. society can exist without hierarchies yes or no?

I skipped it because the sentence before and after put words in my mouth even though I refuted them the previous 3 posts. so stop ignoring what I say please. I never said anything about patriarchal hierarchies good bad or indifferent. I only said that hierarchies are human nature and this is what this guy is saying. you keep going on about unjustified hierarchies... not me. my entire point is simple and irrefutable by anyone. PERIOD. humans are biologically predisposed to be part of a society that involves hierarchies.

I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong. show me this society. there is nothing new under the sun. the truth does not support your ideals. this is why you get so wound and use this odd anarchist lingo. It has been proven that Humans cannot deal with isolation.. have you ever thought why that is exactly??

now you are flip flopping... you just said he's arguing for a reasoning for the patriarchal hierarchy... which he adamantly says is false btw. now you say we are arguing something no one said?? You are the one who doesn't understand what his point is. I know your points... anarchy good! government bad! etc. if that all ended today and you only had a bunch of kids left who knew nothing, you would end up with lord of the flies. not only do humans have a desire to have this hierarchy but certain people have predefined desires as to where they should fit in. some are leaders, some are followers. you know this, but cannot admit it.

he's saying humans have always had heirarchies and always will. end point. no social darwinism or other labels. he's braking it down to a biological reasoning. if he is wrong there would be a society of humans that did not have one. point it out to the class and prove him and I wrong. your superior intellect should have no problem.

He's not at all if you listen to what he said... She brought that up and he scoffed at the idea. He's going back to the dawn of man. white europeans aren't part of his theory. I've had this conversation with you before and you couldn't answer me then. show me ONE group of humans that did not have a social hierarchy. It does not exist. Humans naturally fall into a hierarchy. even then they make up bigger things to be bigger leaders! one does need to actually listen to what is said though. You seem to think that humans can exist without a hierarchy. if that is the case please show me where it has happened. actually, this part I highly dislike. he has flopped on his take on the pronouns. watch another interview where he would not use any pronouns. this one he said he would if asked. as with about half the professors I've dealt with, his classroom is his domain. if you piss in their Cheerio bowl they will fail you. obviously somewhere along the line he was told to change his tune.

Shit it's been a bunch of years since I've gone but I had heard they were setting it back up

on a side note, are they still doing the antique car swap meet up there this year??

so the title "marijuana killing endangered species" is just click bait for "we know that rat poison is killing owls but we don't know where it's coming from, so it's got to be pot farms"

whats the local weather calling for up there?? did a national search and they said anything from 4-12 inches in the barton area where our cabin is

anyone else think that Rogue 1 resembled a new hope just a little too much?? I was like felt like some scenes were just newly shot copies of the original. rogue 1 seemed the best of the new ones for sure. the first one was just horrible, and when they start making him an angsty teenager forget it, I just turned the TV off.

Romans I thought ordered it...

he hasn't shot one close enough to us yet. farthest they have gone is about 600miles. supposedly he's firing these things off mobile launchers too...

because he's not claiming any other countries are the devil as far as I know?? the korean history since WWII just sucks. korea was taken over by the japs (basically they had been slaves historically by one country or another anyway) well before WWII and when we dropped the bombs to end the war it wasn't because we wanted to save lives, it was because russia was becoming too strong and we had to flex some muscle. they had just taken over berlin and had turned their armies around and headed them towards asia. they knew they were getting a slice of anything they "helped" with. so they declared war on japan right at the end. they had a non aggression pact with japan during the rest of the war which allowed japan to fight the rest of asia without fear of the russians. so, the war ends and just like every other nation conquered during WWII we divide it up for a duration of time. the russians get the north and the US gets the south along a set line. We setup a puppet democratic goverment and let the south run mostly by themselves. the communist north drums up a war beat that the southern government is killing off communist party members in the south and invades.... within a short time their army takes all but a tiny corner of the country. before we lose the foothold and korea totally we jump in and reverse that to taking back 90% of korea within something like 1-3 months. before china and russia freak out... and do the same thing.. jumping in and it becomes a battle between the two/three puppet masters. pushing us back to the middle line and then some... until we set at this cease fire... neither country was supposed to be involved with Korea forever... just like germany and any other country we "helped back on it's feet" all parties were supposed to withdraw. after we set this stupid pissing contest up by allowing a cease fire to continue instead of a peace treaty we basically allowed a stalemate. north korea puts all it's money into an army, south korea depends on the US to protect them and puts all their efforts into industry. I'm sure with much help from the US citizens that have been stationed there.... so now we have the north sitting there on a huge standing army looking south at the 7th largest economy in the world over the border waiting for the US to leave so they can take a swing at it.... and we have our own interests there so we can't let that happen.... so now we have this missile game... what is really the point??

pakistan bought missiles from NK.. they are funding this by selling the tech they have been researching on the black market... along with herion.... as far as I know they don't have much for chinese or russian tech after the korean war. they got caught with a boat full of korean war era mig and anti aircraft parts being shipped to them from cuba to keep their air force flying...