Crnr2Crnr

imagine that amount coming from a local groundwater table, daily. stick em in the great lakes or near enormous rivers and watersheds, not in Beverly's back yard.

no, just click continue maybe the BBC is swiftboating you?

maybe they can build them underwater, like Atlantis? daughter did a research paper on the amount of water these data centers utilize last semester so I'll have to share the article with her.

unless you're a native American... sometimes I wonder if Native Americans told people in the 'New World' to speak their language?

nothing to say about the drunk guy from Fox news? why am I not surprised...

yeah, go after the employers, farm owners, contractors, landscaping companies, etc. seize their assets, let ice arrest them and deport these 'Americans' to the country their illegal 'employees' are from. odds of that are about as likely as term limits and a balanced budget amendment

maybe he was surprised someone from one of the Shithole Countries spoke English?

ArcticInsiderBig changes at the top of ISOC. Carl Schubitzke is now th...Meet Carl Schubitzke Carl Schubitzke is a former professional snocross racer turned motorsports executive and now owner of ISOC. With over a decade of experience in competitive racing, he transitio... file this under 2025 or 2026?

The Mirror USConfused Trump forced to turn to an ignorant Hegseth on l...Trump was caught unaware as a reporter asked him about chemical weapons and Russia, as Trump frantically looked at his staff to find someone who had the answer Hegseth did not inform the White House before he authorized pause on weapon shipments to Ukraine, sources say https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/08/politics/hegseth-did-not-inform-white-house-ukraine-weapons-pause elect a 🤡 expect a circus...

just fyi, it's Wednesday... not Thursday and, it's Taco Tuesday... not Thursday how about Waffle Wednesday? liberation day...

A Vermont dairy farm was raided. The mixed messages from Washington since then have increased fears The owner of the farm declined to comment. http://wnyt.com/ap-top-news/a-vermont-dairy-farm-was-raided-the-mixed-messages-from-washington-since-then-have-increased-fears/

Rollins suggests Medicaid recipients can replace deported farmworkers https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5389919-agriculture-secretary-migrant-laborers/

checo and yuki both struggling with the #2 car the past couple years. Max's car was undrivable last weekend at Silverstone even though he Q'd for the pole, loose ass end, low drag for top speed, he had a big spin and somehow managed not to stuff it in the wall. poor wet strategy as well. lot of speculation regarding his contract and Merc as well... hadjar and Lawson also wrecked in the RB cars

wow... I did not see that coming

no shit?

house Republicans and two Swiss lawmakers?!!!?

hey numbnuts, are you going with Trump or Elon these days? inquiring minds and all...

refute the AI, lack of intelligence one that's because you have a boring, shallow and unintelligent life TooSlow

MCDS... all day, every day and even on weekends

release everything regarding Epstein... Just like the JFK files and everything about Area 51

KRWG Public MediaTrump's "golden share" a concern in Nippon/U.S. Steel dealJerry Pacheco shares his thoughts and analysis on the purchase of U.S. Steel by Nippon

AI Overview Fiscal conservatism generally favors limited government intervention in the economy, including lower taxes and reduced spending. While tariffs are taxes on imports, they can be seen by some fiscal conservatives as a way to protect domestic industries and increase government revenue, while others view them as a form of government intervention that distorts free markets and hurts consumers. Here's a more detailed look: Arguments for Tariffs: Revenue Generation: Tariffs can be a source of government revenue, potentially offsetting some need for other taxes. Protectionism: Some fiscal conservatives support tariffs as a way to protect domestic industries from foreign competition, potentially leading to job growth in those sectors. National Security: In some cases, tariffs may be seen as necessary to protect industries deemed vital for national security. Arguments Against Tariffs: Distortion of Markets: Tariffs can interfere with the natural flow of goods and services, leading to inefficient allocation of resources. Higher Prices for Consumers: Tariffs increase the cost of imported goods, which can lead to higher prices for consumers. Retaliation: Tariffs can trigger retaliatory measures from other countries, potentially harming U.S. exporters. Economic Slowdown: Some studies suggest that tariffs can negatively impact economic growth by increasing uncertainty and reducing trade. Fiscal Conservative Views on Tariffs: Classical Liberalism: Historically, classical liberals in the US often supported tariffs, particularly to benefit producers. However, this support was often linked to the idea of a limited role for government, with tariffs being seen as a way to promote national prosperity. Modern Fiscal Conservatives: Modern fiscal conservatives are divided on the issue. Some may support tariffs as a way to protect domestic industries, while others argue that they are a form of government intervention that contradicts the principles of free markets and limited government. Revenue vs. Free Markets: Some fiscal conservatives may see tariffs as a necessary evil, a way to generate revenue while acknowledging their potential negative impacts on the economy. Others may strongly oppose tariffs, arguing that they harm the economy and violate the principles of free markets. Examples: President Trump's administration imposed tariffs on a wide range of goods from various countries, including China and Mexico, arguing that these tariffs were necessary to protect American industries and address trade imbalances. Some fiscal conservatives have criticized these tariffs, arguing that they are a form of protectionism that harms consumers and the overall economy. There's a growing bipartisan effort in Congress to limit the president's ability to impose tariffs unilaterally, suggesting a broader debate on the appropriate role of tariffs in US trade policy.