Crnr2Crnr

Ukraine must not have Pete in their signal group chat

whoa, lighten up there Robert Byrd

it's not a theory shit for brains

shhh... I'm digging up your old shit for a laugh Mr Not a Snowmobiler

Trump waffling and shutting his stupid f'ng pie hole is what brought the markets back peTer rEtarrD0

oh, I can see how a guy on a snowmobile forum would wanna keep that a big secret... you don't own one or even ride do you? just here for the politics you used to like? lol... what a dork

what misery? mockery with certainty btw, you never answered when I asked you what kind of snowmobile you own a while back...

Wausau Pilot & ReviewWake boat owners sue northern Wisconsin town to overturn...By Danielle Kaeding | Wisconsin Public Radio A lawsuit against a small northern Wisconsin town seeks to overturn a local ban on wake surfing, saying theA lawsuit against a small northern Wisconsin town seeks to overturn a local ban on wake surfing, saying the regulation is illegal and unconstitutional. The lawsuit is believed to be the first such legal challenge to local control of wake boats in Wisconsin. Texas resident Chad M. McEver, Florida resident Scott Oppenheimer and the Peggy Oppenheimer Living Trust are suing the town of Scott in Burnett County over its ordinance that restricts operation of wake boats on four lakes. The town passed the ordinance last November. Although the people suing live out-of-state, they own or use lakefront property on Birch Island Lake within the town. The large boats are designed to magnify a boat’s wake through ballast tanks or other features, creating big waves for people to surf. But a growing number of communities have passed local regulations to restrict use of wake boats. Concerns are mounting over their effects on transfer of invasive species, shoreline erosion, fish habitat and the safety of other lake users. Attorneys for the plaintiffs, who are both wake boat owners, say the ordinance violates their constitutional rights to due process and rights under the Public Trust Doctrine. Etc... stay in Texas and Florida and stop damaging the shoreline ya inbred fucks

still, $2T in GDP and jobs though maybe they'll order Boeing's 86-47 fighters instead?

Dems and Reps both spent like drunken sailors on shore leave the past three decades without a plan of action to pay for any of it... so why stop now?

‘The president is obsessed’: Trump fixates on Xi call amid faltering trade talks https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/03/trump-xi-call-trade-talks-00381858

Trump lost, Kameltoe won... 😉

3-1/2 mores of you complaining about it...

Fact check: Debunking 100 Trump false claims from his first 100 days President Donald Trump filled his first 100 days back in office with the same relentless lying and inaccuracy that was a hallmark of his first presidency and his 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns. Some of Trump’s 2025 false claims were about consequential policy matters, others about trivial personal fixations. Some were sophisticated distortions about obscure subjects, others obvious fictions about issues average Americans experience in their daily lives. Many were ad-libbed or posted on social media, but many were scripted into prepared remarks. Aside from the staggering frequency and the trademark brazenness, what stood out was how repetitive Trump’s lying was. Though he regularly sprinkled in some fresh deception, he deployed a core batch of favored falsehoods again and again – undeterred by the fact that many of these claims had been publicly debunked for months or even years. Here is a list of 100 separate false claims from Trump since his inauguration on January 20, fact-checked concisely with hyperlinks to more information. This is not a comprehensive list of the president’s false claims during this period (there were well over 100 in all) or a count of how many total times he was inaccurate (he uttered many of these 100 claims over and over again). https://www.cnn.com/politics/fact-check-trump-false-claims-debunked ya want me to copy and paste them all for ya?

what's that kuLtmEmbEr254 ?

Canadian wildfires bring poor air quality, hazy skies, red sunsets across central, eastern US https://www.foxweather.com/extreme-weather/fires-smoke-air-quality-alert why the fuck can't you imbeciles figure out how to put out your gdamn' fires every year?

Though Hemphill was a defendant in the largest criminal prosecution in American history, she is seemingly standing alone now as the only Jan. 6 defendant to refuse the clemency Mr. Trump offered. Speaking with CBS News from her home in Idaho, Hemphill said, "The pardons just contribute to their narrative, which is all lies, propaganda. We were guilty, period." "We all know that they're gaslighting us. They are using January 6 to just continue Trump's narrative that the Justice Department was weaponized," she said. "They were not. When the FBI came to my home, oh my God, they were very professional. They treated me very good." Hemphill pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge for her role in the crowd on Jan. 6, 2021. Prosecutors argued Hemphill "was in the front of the crowd that confronted U.S. Capitol Police and other law enforcement officers attempting to keep the rioters behind the metal bike-rack barriers." They alleged Hemphill galvanized others to descend on Washington for the certification of the electoral vote after the 2020 election, according to court filings. "On December 28, 2020, Hemphill posted encouragement to go to Washington, D.C. for January 6, saying 'its a WAR!' On January 1, 2021, she posted a message 'on my way to Washington DC January 6th,'" the prosecution said. Hemphill told CBS News the pardons for her and fellow members of the crowd were inappropriate and damaging Americans' views of the federal government. "How could you sleep at night taking a pardon when you know you were guilty? You know that everybody there was guilty. I couldn't live with myself. I have to be right with me. And with God," Hemphill said. Hemphill has sparred on social media and in podcasts with other Jan. 6 defendants over her arguments about what she says is the whitewashing of the Capitol riot. In one segment on a podcast earlier this spring, Hemphill debated Enrique Tarrio, a former Proud Boys leader who was convicted at trial and received the longest prison sentence of any Jan. 6 defendant. Tarrio's sentence was commuted by Mr. Trump. Hemphill told CBS News she expects her protest will garner the attention of the president. "Trump will probably say that ungrateful lady, I'm going to make sure she gets back on probation and give her the worst you can give her. I won't be surprised," she said. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/pamela-hemphill-trump-supporter-refuses-jan-6-pardon/ integrity...

"Images circulating immediately after the attacks appeared to show that Russian aircraft had been hit with remarkable accuracy at some of their most vulnerable points. The Ukrainians seem to have placed relatively small drone swarms in cavities built into the top of trailer trucks. Then, when the trucks were close to the targets, the trailer roofs opened up, and the swarms of drones flew out, surprising and overwhelming Russian defenses. Even how the drones themselves were operated represents something notable. In many cases, they seem to have been flying courses preprogrammed via the open-source software ArduPilot, which has proved effective in navigating unmanned aerial vehicles for hundreds of miles and precisely reaching targets. Although details remain limited, the operation testifies to how rapidly drone technology is evolving. Human operators might well have been observing some of yesterday’s flights and been in a position to take control if necessary, but some of the vehicles may have operated outside of human authority, flying preprogrammed courses. Ukrainian officials have said that some of the drones were basically AI-trained to recognize the most vulnerable parts of Russian aircraft and automatically home in on those areas. The Ukrainians have claimed that more than 40 advanced Russian aircraft were hit and that at least 13 were destroyed. How much of the damage is reparable is not yet clear. Kyiv boasted of destroying more than a third of Russia’s large Tu-95 bombers, which have been a primary launch system for the large volleys of missiles that regularly strike Ukrainian cities. The Tu-95s are literally irreplaceable: Russia has no production facilities making more of these aircraft, and it has not yet designed a successor to the model. Yesterday’s attack also appears to have damaged a large number of Tu-22 M3 bombers and probably one A-50 command aircraft, the Russian equivalent of a U.S.-made airborne warning and control aircraft. The total cost of Russian losses likely runs into several billion dollars. In contrast, the cost of one of the Ukrainian drones used in yesterday’s attack has been estimated at about $1,200—so that even if the airfields were attacked with 100 drones each (a seemingly high estimate), the total cost of the drones used would have been less than $1 million. I struggle to think of a recent military operation where one side suffered so much damage at so little cost to the other. In one sense, the Ukrainian attack represents a culmination of what we have seen happen since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022: Seemingly outmatched by Russia’s much larger military, Ukraine has used drones and other improvised equipment to destroy tanks, large warships, bombers, and other large legacy systems. Military planners and many outside commentators have been too slow to acknowledge the significance of Ukraine’s defensive tactics, but the most recent attacks plainly show the need for major changes in how all militaries are constructed and trained. For the United States and other major Western militaries, Ukraine’s use of trucks parked outside secure areas near military sites will pose uncomfortable questions. How closely do they—or can they—monitor all the truck traffic that streams past their bases? Do they know what happens in every nearby property from which an adversary could hide drone swarms and then launch them with no warning? For many years now, for instance, Chinese interests have been buying large amounts of farmland right next to important U.S. military bases. They could be growing soybeans, but they could also be staging grounds for drone swarms that would make the Ukrainian attacks look minuscule. Meanwhile, in Europe, military bases have in the past few years been regularly overflown by a large number of unknown drones, which are presumably gathering intelligence. Whichever power is responsible obviously has the ability to deploy a larger number of drones in kinetic attacks. The Ukrainians are showing U.S. and European militaries that better security against drone flights is long overdue. For Ukraine’s doubters, these attacks should lead to a period of quiet reflection. President Donald Trump has insisted that Ukraine has “no cards.” The New York Times editorial board recently implied that Ukraine is unlikely to produce a military breakthrough that can change the basic course of the war. But pessimism about Ukraine’s capabilities is ahistorical and wrongheaded. For three years, the Biden administration simultaneously supported Ukraine and discouraged major attacks on Russian soil, for fear of provoking Vladimir Putin too much. That constraint no longer exists, now that Trump has written off Ukraine and appears eager to end the war on Putin’s terms. Until now, Ukraine has had only a limited ability to launch attacks as ambitious as the one it just executed. If Ukraine’s remaining allies help arm it properly to undertake similar operations at scale, it can still win the war." The AtlanticUkraine’s Warning to the World’s Other Military ForcesExpensive planes, tanks, and ships can be destroyed on the cheap.

Ukraine’s Warning to the World’s Other Military Forces https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ukraine-s-warning-to-the-world-s-other-military-forces/ar-AA1FXbcL?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=5c809a9af8fe4285ade0495b6159de11&ei=9 wow, apparently I didn't follow the news over the weekend... maybe we should get rid of the traditional mic and start working with radio shack

magas are gullible... and Trump knows it and apparently just enough people to put him back in office were gullible as well

drones... robots... John Connor

at times I wonder if the goon squad here actually understands what inflation is...

Main Street is still waiting for prices to come down like they were promised...