Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Badger**

USA Contributing Member
  • Posts

    8,881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Everything posted by Badger**

  1. The Constitutional Basis for State Action to Counter Washington’s Dereliction of Duty The Constitution provides a firm foundation for states to act decisively in the absence of the federal government. First, the Biden Administration has neglected its duties under Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution to protect the United States, her citizens and communities being ravaged by this invasion of crime, drugs and humanitarian crisis. Indeed, one can argue that the actions of the administration are effectively facilitating the abrogation of its own obligations. Known as the guarantee clause, Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution states, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them from Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic violence.” Therefore, governors, attorneys general, and state legislatures must take emergency measures–beyond the scope of what has been attempted to this point–to follow through on the primary function of government: protecting its citizens. The Constitution provides states an appropriate “self-help” remedy under Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, which stipulates that, “No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit delay.” There can be no disputing that the influx of well over 1.3 million illegal immigrants this calendar year alone and thousands of pounds of fentanyl and other deadly narcotics, facilitated by the widespread human trafficking efforts of violent international drug cartels, constitutes an invasion of the southern border of the United States. These cartels effectively have operational control over vast swaths of the southern border. Data provided by CBP in March 2021 estimated that cartels and human trafficking organizations are earning nearly $14 million a day moving people illegally across the southern border. These violent international cartels are raking in billions of dollars every year off the pain, suffering, and abuse of migrants. Furthermore, most illegal drugs and narcotics enter the United States through the southern border, a finding outlined in a threat assessment dossier released by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in March of this year. The DEA report also outlines that fentanyl, a deadly narcotic that is smuggled into the U.S. by violent international drug cartels, is primarily responsible for fueling the ongoing opioid epidemic that killed nearly 37,000 Americans in 2019 and a horrific 57,550 people in 2020. Governors and state legislators have a duty to their constituents, fellow citizens, neighbors, and families that undergirds the oath they take to uphold both the United States Constitution and their respective state constitutions. Yes, protection of our nation’s borders constitutionally and even statutorily largely falls under the purview of our federal government. But our federal government is not just sitting idle as states and communities suffer, it is willfully refusing to enact the very policies and execute the very laws that can bring the crisis to an end. The reality is that if the federal government refuses to faithfully execute its own laws, then the states have no recourse but to interpose themselves between the federal government and the people they have sworn to protect in order to achieve deterrence and the removal of illegal aliens. A partial list of the federal policy failings and actions include: On his very first day in office, President Biden signed an executive order that ended the emergency declaration on the border and halted construction of the border wall. The administration’s reimplementation of “catch-and-release” through Executive Order 14010, which releases illegal immigrants into American communities while they await their immigration court hearing. The administration’s neglect in enforcing a court order to restore the MPP, better known as the Remain in Mexico policy, whereby illegal immigrants are returned to Mexico to await the adjudication of their status and asylum claims. The administration’s refusal to fully utilize Title 42 public health protocols to deport illegal immigrants due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The administration’s freeze of the “safe third country” asylum rule which required potential asylum-seekers to first seek asylum in safe nations along their journey as a means of mitigating pressure on the border and deterring false asylum claims.
  2. My post was approved and there is a difference between speculation and speaking for. Just like someone saying from a different county you are speaking for Americans or you are speculating what Americans think.
  3. None, so I'm thinking upper management must think you're a liberal nut case also. God guns and Trump, the mention is enough to send you over the edge.
  4. Could you imagine driving a groomer and drinking? No fucking way in hell!!
  5. Way off the wall post even for a liberal Wisconsin nut case.
  6. I said a couple of beers not a case, who gets drunk on two beers? We always had a few at the trap club then afterward we had a few more. Never did we have children at the club that I remember. We never had a beer when I was hunting till the hunting was over. Next Sally, please step up.
  7. Having a beer or two out shooting?? have you ever been to a trap club?? What a stick in the mud.
  8. Only on FS. Things were way better under Trump,, hands down. Ya he was a pain in the ass but I thought he was funny as hell. Keep spinning that narrative
  9. Wow, Oh well I've done my part. Back to @Jerry 976 don't worry about it pal if I need your opinion I would point blank, haved asked for it.
  10. I'm more of a plow guy myself @f7ben. Love the fact you are bringing them upright. She started with a BB gun then this 22cal semi-auto and a Win 30-30 and I gave her my Rem Model 4 and now she's got a Smith and Wesson Volunteer 6.5 CREEDMOOR she just won.
  11. So who is giving up their guns? I mean the laws don't seem to work, or is that they don't enforce them. Wish all you want they will never confiscate all the guns in this country. Three of my guns are not registered and I am only one of many millions of Americans that have guns that are not registered The US has 393,347,000 Registered guns out of a population of 326,474,00, that is 120.5 guns per person just think if each person has three or four unregistered guns that own guns, the numbers would be off the chart. The hole is way too deep to stop now. Good luck.
  12. According to the ballistics experts on FS I don't have to worry about it. So it's all good.
  13. Anything over 500 cc is too much for you to handle.
  14. Nope and I own one, they are tanks.
×
×
  • Create New...