JEFF

Well didn't this thread take a turn. lol

You don't get it.. He laid out one of the main arguments for voting for Trump. Unlike you he see's the attraction. He understands why Trump could possibly win the election. He makes some valid points in that clip. You do not have the capacity to make objective statements or observations. Moore owns you.

You own nothing. Not even a relevant thought in your head.

MC says Moore is fishing... MC is an idiot...

Most libs do when they actually have to back up a statement.

What a shithead.

This will get a good leaving alone.

No bias in the media... Source: CNN Clinton ally speculates why Clinton used private server 02:30 Story highlights One email says Clinton "wanted to get away with it" Neera Tanden currently helps run the Clinton campaign transition team Washington (CNN)An email from a WikiLeaks hack revealed that Neera Tanden, who currently helps run the Clinton campaign transition team, suggested Hillary Clinton's top aides never disclosed her use of a private email servers because "they wanted to get away with it." Tanden, the president of the liberal think tank Center for American Progress, emailed Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta in March 2015 after news broke that Clinton used a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State. "Why didn't they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy," Tanden wrote to Podesta in March 2015, referencing Clinton's campaign. Tanden then referenced Cheryl Mills, one of Clinton's top aides at the time, writing in another email, "This is a cheryl special. Know you love her, but this stuff is like her Achilles heal (sic). Or kryptonite. she just can't say no to this sh--. Why didn't they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy." Podesta responded to her email, writing "Unbelievable." Clinton aide in hacked email: Need to 'clean up' Obama answer on email server "I guess I know the answer," Tanden wrote back. "They wanted to get away with it." Neither Tanden nor the Clinton campaign immediately responded to requests for comment. And then in an another email, Tanden wrote, "a thought that I'm sure has occurred to you hours ago: the archives request them and she complies immediately (avoids subpeonas) don't yell at me." These emails are part of a wider hack of Podesta's emails published by WikiLeaks. The group has released emails hacked from Podesta's private gmail account daily for more than two weeks. The Clinton campaign has refused to confirm or deny specific emails' authenticity and has accused the Russian government of being behind their theft and release -- a claim WikiLeaks and the Russians have denied. 2016 Election It appears that Tanden was asking why Mills and the other top aide didn't automatically send Clinton's emails to the archives instead of trying to find a way not to hand them over to protect Clinton. CNN cannot independently confirm the emails' authenticity. But the Clinton campaign has not challenged any emails in other WikiLeaks releases. Many of the emails released by WikiLeaks have focused on the fallout from Clinton's private email server use. The campaign team and top aides were involved in lengthy email threads gaming out the response, from statements to the media, to responses to congressional inquiries, to even tweets on the topic. Tanden had also been a frequent character in the emails. As president of CAP and veteran of Obama and Clinton world, Tanden represented a progressive flank of the party and had a close relationship with Podesta, who helped found and lead CAP before stepping down in 2011. In the emails, she frequently used colorful language to describe opponents of the campaign on the left, right or in the media, and also sometimes had criticisms of the candidate or campaign itself, though she described herself as a "loyal soldier" for Clinton. CNN's Tal Kopan and Elise Labott contributed this report.

OMG!!! Another media outlet against Trump! WOW!!! Who would of thought that"d happen???

You really think he's fishing? You don't think it's possible that he can actually see whats going on? Do you think every lib is as blind as you are to the facts that are coming to light in this election? Maybe try doing yourself a favor and actually doing a little research on your own from multiple sources and form your very own thoughts on the matters that face this country...

If this douchbag can see whats going on there's a glimmer of hope. He's like Hollywood version of MC.

Lol. I'm sure you haven't banged high single digit chicks as you call them. You are a fucking joke. Obviously with very low self esteem.

She's awesome alright. Even her campaign manager thinks she's fucking retarded. Politics ‘Her instincts can be terrible’: WikiLeaks reveals fears and frustrations inside Clinton world Hillary Clinton poses with Neera Tanden, center, president of the Center for American Progress, and the center’s founder, John Podesta, in October 2013. (Yuri Gripas /Reuters) By Rosalind S. Helderman October 25 at 6:47 PM On the day the news broke that Hillary Clinton had used a private email account as secretary of state, the man who would soon be named to chair her presidential campaign fired off a note of distress, venting frustration about some of Clinton’s closest aides. “Speaking of transparency, our friends Kendall, Cheryl and Phillipe sure weren’t forthcoming on the facts here,” John Podesta complained in the March 2015 note, referring to Clinton’s personal lawyer David Kendall as well as her former State Department staffers Cheryl Mills and Philippe Reines. “Why didn’t they get this stuff out like 18 months ago? So crazy,” replied Neera Tanden, a longtime Podesta friend who also has worked for Clinton. Then, answering her own question, Tanden wrote again: “I guess I know the answer. They wanted to get away with it.” The exchange, found in hacked emails from Podesta’s account and released Tuesday by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks, provides a striking window into how the revelation of Clinton’s email setup roiled her nascent campaign team in the weeks before its official April 2015 kickoff. The emails show that while campaign aides struggled to get past the public controversy, they also expressed exasperation at each other and, at times, at Clinton — both for her decision to use the server and for the way she handled questions about it. Several exchanges illustrate fears among some top advisers that Clinton and other aides were demonstrating the very traits that polls suggested made her vulnerable: a penchant for secrecy and a hesitancy to admit fault or error. “We’ve taken on a lot of water that won’t be easy to pump out of the boat,” Podesta wrote to Tanden in September 2015, at a time when Clinton’s campaign feared that Vice President Biden was about to enter the race for the Democratic nomination. “Most of that has to do with terrible decisions made pre-campaign, but a lot has to do with her instincts.” Tanden responded, “Almost no one knows better [than] me that her instincts can be terrible.” Tanden and Kendall declined to comment. Neither Reines nor a lawyer for Mills responded to requests for comment. Clinton’s campaign has largely declined to comment on the WikiLeaks emails, which U.S. officials say were stolen through hacks of Democratic groups and leaders orchestrated by the Russian government. Clinton aides have declined to authenticate the emails, noting that the Russians have been known to doctor documents, but they have not disputed any specific revelation from Podesta’s email trove. Instead, Clinton spokesman Glen Caplin on Tuesday responded to questions about the internal campaign struggles revealed in the emails by attacking Republican nominee Donald Trump for his recent comments disputing U.S. government findings that the Kremlin was behind the hacks and for “cheering on WikiLeaks’ Russian-directed propaganda.” Though the WikiLeaks disclosures have not contained the sort of campaign-shaking bombshell that some Trump backers had hoped for, the Podesta emails have provided an almost unprecedented historical archive of the inner workings of a major-party presidential campaign. Some of the emails include private and contemporaneous assessments of the candidate’s strengths and weaknesses by advisers widely seen as likely to hold top posts in Clinton’s White House should she win. They show that in August 2015, nearly seven months after the New York Times revealed Clinton’s use of a private account and after the Associated Press identified her private server, Clinton’s aides were still struggling to persuade the candidate that she should show remorse for her email practices. By that time, the FBI had opened an investigation into whether classified material had been mishandled through Clinton’s use of the server. Some of the most frank commentary can be seen in exchanges between two friends and frequent correspondents: Podesta, a longtime Clinton hand who founded the powerhouse liberal think tank Center for American Progress, and Tanden, a former top aide to Clinton’s 2008 presidential run who now heads the center. Both are strong supporters of Clinton and her presidential bid. In another email released by WikiLeaks, Tanden referred to herself as a “loyal soldier” who would “do whatever Hillary needs always.” Their email exchanges often appear to be written out of concern for Clinton’s best interests. “I know this email thing isn’t on the level. I’m fully aware of that,” Tanden wrote in an August 2015 note to Podesta. “But her inability to just do a national interview and communicate genuine feelings of remorse and regret is now, I fear, becoming a character problem (more so than honesty).” On Sept. 4, Clinton gave an interview to NBC News’s Andrea Mitchell, saying she was “sorry that this has been confusing to people” but otherwise dodging questions about whether she apologized for her actions. “Everyone wants her to apologize. And she should. Apologies are like her Achilles heel,” Tanden wrote later that day. Three days later, Clinton had still not apologized, even as the issue dominated campaign news coverage. “This apology thing has become like a pa­thol­ogy,” Tanden wrote. “I can only imagine what’s happening in the campaign. Is there some way I can be helpful here?” “You should email her,” Podesta replied. “She can say she’s sorry without apologizing to the American people. Tell her to say it and move on, why get hung on this.” Finally, the next day, Clinton told ABC News that her use of the server had been a “mistake.” “I’m sorry about that. I take responsibility,” she said. The WikiLeaks disclosures reveal how, from the earliest days of the campaign, some advisers and staffers feared that Mills, who had served in the White House counsel’s office during the Republican investigations of the 1990s and then served as Clinton’s chief of staff at the State Department, enabled Clinton’s tendencies to bunker down. In her March 2015 exchange with Podesta about the email controversy, Tanden lay the blame squarely at Mills’s feet. “This is a cheryl special,” Tanden wrote. “Know you love her, but this stuff is like her Achilles heal. Or kryptonite. she just can’t say no to this s---.” Local Politics Alerts Breaking news about local government in D.C., Md., Va. Sign up Mills has no formal relationship with the campaign but, the emails show, consults frequently about all major decisions. If Clinton wins, she could assume a major role in the White House. The emails show, at one point, a similar skepticism of Mills from campaign manager Robbie Mook, the young operative Clinton appointed to build an operation that would avoid the personality clashes and internal dramas that plagued her 2008 bid. In February 2015, Mook complained to Podesta that Mills was going around him to vet campaign contractors. “It is secretly going around a transparent system we all agreed upon,” he wrote. “The secret s--- has got to step. It’s a giant time suck.” The emails also show a fondness among Clinton’s staff for her strengths and genuine enthusiasm when she did well in interviews or other public appearances. After Clinton appeared on “Face the Nation” in September 2015, an ally wrote Podesta to praise her appearance. “Thought she was really good. Really good,” he wrote, before adding: “She sometimes laughs a little too hard at jokes that aren’t that funny. Other than that.” Podesta responded with humor: “Laughing too hard,” he wrote, “is her authentic weirdness.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/her-instincts-can-be-terrible-wikileaks-reveals-fears-and-frustrations-inside-clinton-world/2016/10/25/a6ceefdc-9ae0-11e6-a0ed-ab0774c1eaa5_story.html

You are obviously a charter member of black lives matter if you really think that she is even remotely qualified to be president.

You don't sound happy. You sound like a bitter angry 13 year old girl.

But all those women had their crotches grabbed!

Jesus you are either naive or just plain stupid. Embarrasses me that you are from my state.

George Soros. Photo by Harald Dettenborn, Wikipedia Commons. BY MINA OCTOBER 25, 2016 As Election Day in the United States draws closer, fears of voter fraud continue to plague the process. Adding to these concerns is the fact a number of states will use voting machines that some assert could be under the influence of billionaire George Soros. According to Polizette, UK-based company Smartmatic recently posted a chart claiming that it would provide for the November 8 election up to 50,000 voting machines in as many as 16 US states. But, according to a spokesperson for the National Association of Secretaries of State, Smartmatic is not certified to provide equipment for American elections. Adding to the confusion is the chairman of Smartmatic, Mark Malloch-Brown, who is a member of the board of the Open Society Foundations, owned by billionaire George Soros. Malloch-Brown has a long history with Soros, founding the International Crisis Group with the billionaire’s backing and participating in the Soros Advisory Committee on Bosnia. Soros has long held ties to Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. Emails from campaign chair John Podesta, released by WikiLeaks, appear to show Clinton attempting to appease Soros. “I would only do this for political reasons (ie to make Soros happy),” reads an email from Robert Mook, Clinton’s campaign strategist, to Podesta and vice chairwoman Huma Abedin. The exchange was in reference to Clinton’s attendance at an America Votes fundraiser. America Votes is a social-welfare organization that works to advance progressive causes and increase Democratic Party voter turnout. While it does not disclose its donors, it is rumored to be supported by business-magnate Soros, known for his active backing of progressive and liberal causes. Another exchange between Podesta and Michael Vachon, adviser to the chair of Soros Fund Management, shows an unusual interest in the European migration crisis and political unrest in Ukraine. “In general I think George is more interested in talking about policy than the campaign per se, though I can’t imagine you won’t spend some time on politics. In a separate email I will send you George’s latest thinking on the migration crisis, which he is spending a lot of time on,” Vachon writes. “His other big preoccupation these days is Ukraine. Both the migration crisis and Ukraine are part of his view of Europe as falling apart and the UK as ultimately not doing enough to prevent the political disintegration of its most important ally.” As Polizette points out, Smartmatic has also appeared in classified US diplomatic cables from 2006, released by WikiLeaks. “The Smartmatic machines used in Venezuela are widely suspected of, though never proven conclusively to be, susceptible to fraud,” reads the memo. “The Venezuelan opposition is convinced that the Smartmatic machines robbed them of victory in the August 2004 referendum. Since then, there have been at least eight statistical analyses performed on the referendum results.” “One study obtained the data log from the CANTV network and supposedly proved that the Smartmatic machines were bi-directional and in fact showed irregularities in how they reported their results to the CNE central server during the referendum,” the memo stated. http://www.eurasiareview.com/25102016-concerns-that-soros-linked-company-providing-voting-machines-to-key-us-states/

???

Trump kept a helmet...

It's pretty sad that over half of this country is completely inept and so apathetic. For the first time in my life I can honestly some sort of civil war may be brewing. On a side note and probably completely unrelated, ncic was down yesterday. No Ncic... no gun sales. Fucking ingenious of the government to stop gun sales by blaming a computer glitch...

There will be crickets on this...

What is it going to take for people to condemn these actions. Has the american public degraded to such a point that absolute corruption is acceptable?

I agree with that. But are you saying Obamas comment is in no way inciting racial tension? Are you also saying that the black lives matter group and movement are in no way trying to incite racial tension?

I think it sucks that it happened. She definitely fucked up bad by all appearances. But on a side note, how are the protesters acting in Tulsa vs Charlotte?