awful knawful Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 57 minutes ago, EvilBird said: So because you didnt experience any adverse reactions that explains it all. Got it. Yes. That's a real life trial. I'm 100% fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 56 minutes ago, awful knawful said: Yes. That's a real life trial. I'm 100% fine. Which matches the chart from New Zealand. Imagine that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 Lloyd is still off searching twitter for anything that he feels is on topic as a retort. Must really suck to not be able to think for himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 17 hours ago, $poorsledder$ said: Largest Covid Vaccine Study Yet Finds Links to Health Conditions (msn.com) In summary. From a CDC funded study. About 100 million subject 0-42 day window. About 1.5 million serious adverse reactions. "I just wanna travel" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 22 hours ago, Deephaven said: You REALLY, REALLY,REALLY suck at math. This is how they fool idiots like you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 17 hours ago, awful knawful said: 100% works. I'm still alive and never contracted COVID. 👍 Seriously retarded product of inbreeding. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 16 hours ago, Deephaven said: Except they aren't. Dore is an idiot. When you're a fool, you're beyond help. Seriously retarded idiot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 17 hours ago, EvilBird said: So because you didnt experience any adverse reactions that explains it all. Got it. They don't understand stats, if you have a 1 in 100 chance of a serious adverse reaction, it means likely nothing will happen to you, but it will most likely harm a lot of the population. Some serious retards here. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 41 minutes ago, ArcticCrusher said: They don't understand stats The irony! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 3 minutes ago, akvanden said: The irony! 20 million lives saved. Irony all right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said: They don't understand stats Show us you do. You posted a bunch of links that do not at all back up the discussion we were having. Or keep running around twitter searching for someone to think for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 20 Author Share Posted February 20 56 minutes ago, Deephaven said: Show us you do. You posted a bunch of links that do not at all back up the discussion we were having. Or keep running around twitter searching for someone to think for you. You and your stupid flock are beyond help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 The only one stupid here is the one who can't make an argument without a link. Try it once. How does that chart show what you claim? It doesn't. Its so fucking laughable. Obviously you realized that and are trying to divert everyone. Fucking moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 (edited) 7 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: 100 million lives saved. Post some more stats showing the slow decline of fertility rates in a random country half way around the world over the past 15 years. Highlight 2023 to distract us. Edited February 21 by akvanden Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted February 20 Share Posted February 20 4 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said: Seriously retarded product of inbreeding. While you were working, I was out sledding all day. Sucks to be you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 22 Share Posted February 22 I gave you a few days to find a link. Still can't. Dumb fuck. Let's look at your post. You shouldn't listen to your flock. Ben actually summarized it ok, yours is fucked. You claim that the excess deaths are in the vaxxed which is completely wrong. Sure they have more, but that is solely based on way more being vaxxed. On 2/17/2024 at 1:21 PM, ArcticCrusher said: Poor Deepfaggot. Even Ben from USMortality. Excess deaths in the vaxxed, not unvaxxed. The ultimate sheep is you. You are obviously too dumb to understand VERY simple math. Let's break it down. 95.8% of New Zealanders have had a shot. If you look at the chart above the normal max line is 3,000. That would mean ~2875 of the deaths should be in the vaxxed and ~125 in the unvaxxed. The chart shows that there are way more than 125. ie, more unvaxxed are dying in "excess" than vaxxed. Funny since the high risk is the vaxxed group. Only conclusion you can draw from that data is that somehow the vax is beneficial in reducing excess chance of death. Of course you saw the big pink and let your flock fool you. Fucking dumb sheep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gold Member Stephen Hawking Posted February 22 Gold Member Share Posted February 22 6 hours ago, Deephaven said: I gave you a few days to find a link. Still can't. Dumb fuck. Let's look at your post. You shouldn't listen to your flock. Ben actually summarized it ok, yours is fucked. You claim that the excess deaths are in the vaxxed which is completely wrong. Sure they have more, but that is solely based on way more being vaxxed. You are obviously too dumb to understand VERY simple math. Let's break it down. 95.8% of New Zealanders have had a shot. If you look at the chart above the normal max line is 3,000. That would mean ~2875 of the deaths should be in the vaxxed and ~125 in the unvaxxed. The chart shows that there are way more than 125. ie, more unvaxxed are dying in "excess" than vaxxed. Funny since the high risk is the vaxxed group. Only conclusion you can draw from that data is that somehow the vax is beneficial in reducing excess chance of death. Of course you saw the big pink and let your flock fool you. Fucking dumb sheep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 9 hours ago, Deephaven said: I gave you a few days to find a link. Still can't. Dumb fuck. Let's look at your post. You shouldn't listen to your flock. Ben actually summarized it ok, yours is fucked. You claim that the excess deaths are in the vaxxed which is completely wrong. Sure they have more, but that is solely based on way more being vaxxed. You are obviously too dumb to understand VERY simple math. Let's break it down. 95.8% of New Zealanders have had a shot. If you look at the chart above the normal max line is 3,000. That would mean ~2875 of the deaths should be in the vaxxed and ~125 in the unvaxxed. The chart shows that there are way more than 125. ie, more unvaxxed are dying in "excess" than vaxxed. Funny since the high risk is the vaxxed group. Only conclusion you can draw from that data is that somehow the vax is beneficial in reducing excess chance of death. Of course you saw the big pink and let your flock fool you. Fucking dumb sheep. @ArcticCrusher You just got bitch slapped! Ball gargling fag. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Every one of his links is that way. He's always wrong as fuck and can't see it. Definition of a fucking sheep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akvanden Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 12 hours ago, Deephaven said: That would mean ~2875 of the deaths should be in the vaxxed and ~125 in the unvaxxed It’s like the time when he was like “60% of the hospital admits are vaccinated - the majority!” Without realizing that 80% had been vaccinated meaning that 20% of the population was driving 40% of hospitalizations. He thinks in absolute terms, rates of prevalence escape him. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deephaven Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 Simple statistics and math confuse the shit out of him. Of course his idiotic flock is feeding him the same misinformation and he isn't smart enough to actual think and just regurgitates what they tell him. Makes it particularly funny when he then blames others for having no critical thinking capability. Derp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awful knawful Posted February 23 Share Posted February 23 @ArcticCrusher still hasn't shown. What a faggot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 23 Author Share Posted February 23 22 hours ago, Deephaven said: I gave you a few days to find a link. Still can't. Dumb fuck. Let's look at your post. You shouldn't listen to your flock. Ben actually summarized it ok, yours is fucked. You claim that the excess deaths are in the vaxxed which is completely wrong. Sure they have more, but that is solely based on way more being vaxxed. You are obviously too dumb to understand VERY simple math. Let's break it down. 95.8% of New Zealanders have had a shot. If you look at the chart above the normal max line is 3,000. That would mean ~2875 of the deaths should be in the vaxxed and ~125 in the unvaxxed. The chart shows that there are way more than 125. ie, more unvaxxed are dying in "excess" than vaxxed. Funny since the high risk is the vaxxed group. Only conclusion you can draw from that data is that somehow the vax is beneficial in reducing excess chance of death. Of course you saw the big pink and let your flock fool you. Fucking dumb sheep. You're a serious retard if you believe that. More people died than expected, that is not debatable, so what did the vaccine do if it saved lives? You can fool some of the people some of the time but you can fool Deepfaggot and his dumb flock all of the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 23 Author Share Posted February 23 You even lost Cuomo. Stay strong idiots. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ArcticCrusher Posted February 23 Author Share Posted February 23 They even dumbed down the NZ data for you. Again, even a blind squirrel catches a nut every once in a while, but not the flock. Excess deaths spiked after vax rollout. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.