Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Supreme Court justice omitted portions of husband's income on disclosure forms for years


Recommended Posts

  • Platinum Contributing Member

Oops.  Its hilarious how many black women in politics or whatnot who generalize and hate white men seem to be married to one.   Especially rich ones.  :lol:    

https://www.foxnews.com/us/ketanji-brown-jackson-ethics-complaints-referred-to-judicial-conference-finance-committee

FIRST ON FOX – The Committee on Financial Disclosures in the Judicial Conference is reviewing a complaint against Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson citing a failure to include her husband’s income in financial disclosures.

A conservative policy group, the Center for Renewing America, last month filed a complaint with the Judicial Conference – the governing body of federal courts – alleging that Jackson "willfully failed to disclose" required information about her husband’s malpractice consulting income for more than a decade.

On Dec. 21, the group was notified that its complaint had been referred to the Financial Disclosers Committee for official review. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

More fake outrage.

Why is that? If she intentionally withheld his earnings that would be tax fraud and should be dealt with whether it's a SCJ or a regular Joe. Don't you agree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

More fake outrage.

 

17 minutes ago, J. Jackson said:

Why is that? If she intentionally withheld his earnings that would be tax fraud and should be dealt with whether it's a SCJ or a regular Joe. Don't you agree?

:snack: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
4 hours ago, J. Jackson said:

Why is that? If she intentionally withheld his earnings that would be tax fraud and should be dealt with whether it's a SCJ or a regular Joe. Don't you agree?

It's only tax fraud if she withheld it from the IRS. I believe in this case it was from a judicial committee for ethics. So still fraud I'm sure, just not tax fraud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gold Member
10 hours ago, Mainecat said:

More fake outrage.

Why not condemn BOTH of them? Instead you defend the Dem and attack the Rep. So typical of the mindless drone you are.

Edited by Kivalo
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...