Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

How Trump's Steel Tariffs Failed


Recommended Posts

How Trump's Steel Tariffs Failed
 

The U.S. and European Union on Monday announced a truce on steel and aluminum tariffs, heading off a June 1 escalation as the two sides negotiate over “global excess capacity” and a potential tariff repeal. That’s a small step forward, but President Biden would do far more good for the U.S. economy if he rolled them back unilaterally. 

The evidence is overwhelming that Donald Trump’s tariffs have benefited the few to the detriment of the many. Consider the roughly 300 American manufacturers that wrote to Mr. Biden this month, protesting scarce metal materials and unsustainable prices. The bulk of the signatories were unsung industrial companies with names like Ohio Screw Products or Clips and Clamps Industries. “On some products,” they said, “American businesses pay 40 percent more for similar steel compared to their European counterparts.” Lead times have risen from six weeks to 20 weeks, “with some products not promised for delivery until 2022.” Mr. Biden’s big infrastructure plans could worsen the strain. 

(snip) 

Meantime, the tariffs hurt industries that buy and use steel, plus their workers and millions of consumers. A 2019 Federal Reserve paper estimated that higher steel prices led to a loss of 75,000 manufacturing jobs. As one example, Europe’s retaliatory tariffs on Harley-Davidson led it to shift some production overseas. 

Another tariff analysis said that each new steel job cost consumers $900,000. Tariffs begat tariffs, as Mr. Trump tried to prop up steel makers further by levying (unlawfully, a court later said) additional taxes on metal imports like nails. Companies that couldn’t reorganize their supply chains, maybe because they needed specialized parts not available in the U.S., had to go begging—and politicking—for tariff exclusions from Washington. 

Mr. Trump justified his tariffs by invoking national security based on an obscure 1962 law, which wasn’t a believable story at the time and still isn’t. His own man at the Pentagon said the military requires only 3% of U.S. steel and aluminum production. Mr. Trump’s protectionism failed by its own terms, and Mr. Biden won’t get a better chance to jettison it. 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-trumps-steel-tariffs-failed-11621288859
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Constant bombardment of articles like this is why we have the shit policies we currently do.  MC and others like him fail to understand why these articles are sent to people like him.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lmfao so the escalating cost and scarcity of raw goods is trumps tariffs now.  Lmfao .

Every one knew if Trump lost Biden would cave and look like a wet rag on every front that benefits other counterys and fucks the American worker . And mostly the union worker to boot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...