hwytohell Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7002325/omg-Huma-Adebin-reacted-hacking-attempt-Hillarys-email-server.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 I stand by the assessment of the IG Hillary should have been charged with criminal neglecgence. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 These are the top people of the Democrat party.......What does that tell you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted May 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted May 8, 2019 The question should have be why she had a private server and why Obama left her have it? Think about that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, Highmark said: The question should have be why she had a private server and why Obama left her have it? Think about that? He didn't "let her have it". He didn't know. I mean, except for his emails to her, on her private server, discussing her private server. So he knew but trusted her to exercise due diligence concerning government matters. I mean, except for his emails to her, on her private server, discussing government matters. So, he knew she was doing government business on there but trusted her to not discuss matters of national security. I mean, except for his emails..................... Meh....it all really makes good sense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, Zambroski said: He didn't "let her have it". He didn't know. I mean, except for his emails to her, on her private server, discussing her private server. So he knew but trusted her to exercise due diligence concerning government matters. I mean, except for his emails to her, on her private server, discussing government matters. So, he knew she was doing government business on there but trusted her to not discuss matters of national security. I mean, except for his emails..................... Meh....it all really makes good sense. They lost those emails that would even remotely show that he knew about some private server. The problem is that fact that most of the public seems to ignore the fact that it usually takes at least a TO and FROM address for emails. Nothing is lost, it's just harder to find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 Just now, racer254 said: They lost those emails that would even remotely show that he knew about some private server. The problem is that fact that most of the public seems to ignore the fact that it usually takes at least a TO and FROM address for emails. Nothing is lost, it's just harder to find. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlos Danger Posted May 8, 2019 Share Posted May 8, 2019 1 hour ago, racer254 said: They lost those emails that would even remotely show that he knew about some private server. The problem is that fact that most of the public seems to ignore the fact that it usually takes at least a TO and FROM address for emails. Nothing is lost, it's just harder to find. The third email down in the link seems to prove that 1 the white house or state department knew about the server and had in the past sent sensitive material. And 2 it also proves that the white house or state department knew some sort of breech had occurred. Let's see the paperwork on the investigation of this breech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.