The Dems Now Support Romney?

[Zambroski]

This was a weird piece this morning............WHAT?  Now Romney is a "nostalgic" choice?  And "horrified by Trump in the White House"?  I thought Trump had no chance?  Ahhh....the over confidence of our Dem leadership shows it's uncertainty over this abortion of an election (and their candidate).

 

Excerpt (link below):

WASHINGTON (AP) — When President Barack Obama ran for re-election, Democrats made no secret of their disdain for Mitt Romney. That was all before Donald Trump.

Horrified by the prospect of Trump in the White House, Obama and his party have changed their tune about Romney. As they denounce Trump as "unhinged" and unfit, they're getting nostalgic about the 2012 Republican nominee they now describe as principled, competent and honorable.

It's a sharp reversal from four years ago. Back then, Democrats spent hundreds of millions of dollars portraying the former Massachusetts governor as a callous, unpatriotic, pet-abusing caricature of the uber-rich.

 

http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2016-08-24/horrified-by-trump-democrats-getting-nostalgic-about-romney

[Mileage Psycho]

Romney looks like the second coming when standing next to Trump  

[Dave]

9 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Romney looks like the second coming when standing next to Trump  

So hes re born in your eyes....

[Zambroski]

13 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Romney looks like the second coming when standing next to Trump  

And Obama too!  

Hillary....well, she just looks like the second "cumming".  

[Dave]

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

And Obama too!  

Hillary....well, she just looks like the second "cumming".  

She didnt do that....well maybe once she did.

[Cold War]

Here's  the difference.

The media/ left (same animal) could/can control Romney. They handled him easily. Even during the debate when he had Obama on the ropes, he let the media run interference for Obama, and he cowered down. Romney was apologizing six ways to Sunday for being a successful  business man. Do you think Trump would hang his head in shame over his wealth, or let some overweight slob posing as a impartial moderator back him down?

 

 

 

[Mileage Psycho]

40 minutes ago, The Troll said:

So hes re born in your eyes....

Has been since I saw this photo......

 

[Cold War]

Yes, perfect example.

Even when it comes to his religion  and beliefs. Let the left ridicule & mock you ..........While you apologize.

 

[Zambroski]

9 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Here's  the difference.

The media/ left (same animal) could/can control Romney. They handled him easily. Even during the debate when he had Obama on the ropes, he let the media run interference for Obama, and he cowered down. Romney was apologizing six ways to Sunday for being a successful  business man. Do you think Trump would hang his head in shame over his wealth, or let some overweight slob posing as a impartial moderator back him down?

 

 

 

Good post..and points!

6 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

Has been since I saw this photo......

 

Are those the "magic underwear"?  

Americans were not going to elect a Morman...and that is pretty much that.  But, a Muslim acting like a Christian...BINGO!  All stupid reasons anyway.  Religion is nothing more than a psychological "crutch" disorder if you ask me anyway.

[racer254]

2 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Yes, perfect example.

Even when it comes to his religion  and beliefs. Let the left ridicule & mock you ..........While you apologize.

 

Yep,

Trump isn't rolling over as easily as most of the current crop of Repubs usually do.

[Zambroski]

8 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Yep,

Trump isn't rolling over as easily as most of the current crop of Repubs usually do.

True.  But he is starting to soften his points a bit.  And I hope his supporters understand why.  The working white man is not the majority voter any longer.  R's gotta make a grab for the women voters, and "minorities" that want to work and contribute in their own self betterment.  That last one is a challenge with our negroes.  We really need to get popular with the Hispanic population quickly.

[Cold War]

15 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Good post..and points!

Are those the "magic underwear"?  

Americans were not going to elect a Morman...and that is pretty much that.  But, a Muslim acting like a Christian...BINGO!  All stupid reasons anyway.  Religion is nothing more than a psychological "crutch" disorder if you ask me anyway.

Yeah, the media wanted nothing to do with crazy ass, anti American, Obama mentor, Jeremiah  Wright, and of course Romney was happy to oblige

A lot of people use religion as a crutch, but for others it is a way to meet like minded people, spend an hour a week in tranquility.

Not my thing, but if you like it and get something out of it, I can think of worse things people can spend their time.  

[Zambroski]

18 minutes ago, Cold War said:

Yeah, the media wanted nothing to do with crazy ass, anti American, Obama mentor, Jeremiah  Wright, and of course Romney was happy to oblige

A lot of people use religion as a crutch, but for others it is a way to meet like minded people, spend an hour a week in tranquility.

Not my thing, but if you like it and get something out of it, I can think of worse things people can spend their time.  

A real good friend of mine is religious.  Him and his wife both go to church every Sunday and teach Sunday school periodically.  Best Christian I've ever known too.  Not hypocritical toward others.  In no way is he self righteous.  We used to get together as couples and have a blast.  Our debates and jabs at each other about Atheism vs. Christianity were epic and funny as hell.  I miss that fucker too (we moved).

Edited August 24, 2016 by Zambroski

[Cold War]

2 hours ago, Zambroski said:

True.  But he is starting to soften his points a bit.  And I hope his supporters understand why.  The working white man is not the majority voter any longer.  R's gotta make a grab for the women voters, and "minorities" that want to work and contribute in their own self betterment.  That last one is a challenge with our negroes.  We really need to get popular with the Hispanic population quickly.

I think his recent plea to Blacks is  as good as it gets.  "what do you possibly have to lose"?

The sad reality is a lot of those people don't want opportunities, they want hand outs.

Voting in Democrats is their job. 

 

1 hour ago, Zambroski said:

A real good friend of mine is religious.  Him and his wife both go to church every Sunday and teach Sunday school periodically.  Best Christian I've ever known too.  Not hypocritical toward others.  In no way is he self righteous.  We used to get together as couples and have a blast.  Our debates and jabs at each other about Atheism vs. Christianity were epic and funny as hell.  I miss that fucker too (we moved).

Yup, I know both kinds.

My folks and my wife grandparents are the real deal.

They practice what they preach & give until it hurts.

[Zambroski]

7 minutes ago, Cold War said:

I think his recent plea to Blacks is  as good as it gets.  "what do you possibly have to lose"?

The sad reality is a lot of those people don't want opportunities, they want hand outs.

Voting in Democrats is their job. 

 

 

EPIC TRUTH.

[Capt.Storm]

2 hours ago, Zambroski said:

EPIC TRUTH.

well yeah..if i was reliant on the gov i would do they same thing...and its not just blacks and latinos..plenty of white trash also...though the white trash prolly don't bother to vote much.

[racer254]

The dems will support anyone that will keep the current washington establishment going.  That is all that currently matters to them.

[Zambroski]

4 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said:

well yeah..if i was reliant on the gov i would do they same thing...and its not just blacks and latinos..plenty of white trash also...though the white trash prolly don't bother to vote much.

Hang on....let's play a "whose on first" game.  And I'm not sure where it's going really....I just want to exercise my fingers.  

Democrats and welfare recipients go hand in hand.  So do union and Democrats.  But that is a self defeating prophecy.  Union people work, welfare folk do not...so, stands to reason, the union people are support the welfare recipients.  Democrats support labor union for their votes.  But labor unions with the support of the Democrats help drive major jobs out of the country..causing union unemployment and thus, no support for the welfare people.  Hmmmm....how can Dems stop this bleed?  Well, listen for the keywords: Infrastructure building/rebuilding (and of course EDUCATION..the "elite intellectuals" in the teachers UNIONS).  Bridges, roads, government buildings and government interests paid for with big government contracts.   Companies cannot outsource what needs to happen on American soil. Those are what will put trade unions in the voter seats.  And in turn, support the welfare vote.  Now for the sake of time...let's leave the mining sector out of this...that's comedy at a level I can't do right now.  The "Beaners"...well, they are a hard working bunch for the most part and just wanna stay here one way or another (legally or illegally).  Most of their income (taxes or not) tend to go back to help family and friends in their home country.  So, they are in for whoever is promising them the least amount of hassle while doing their "thang".  And that is not usually the taxpayers...or welfare recipients.  Ironically, they are on their own within the democratic community but their votes are staggeringly huge.  Immigrants take jobs that aren't being taken by the welfare recipients.  So, the black move down a notch on the labor pole.  Not that they were ever up one, it's just now there is another player between them and employment.  And then there is the "white trash".  And there are TONS of them too.  Most of them on a "welfare dole" are working lower class..a huge number on food stamps...and they vote too...but it is a kind of split due to a maybe unearned sense of pride, religious or race views, so they are a wash in the whole process.  Nothing funnier than a whitey getting the old food stamps out at the grocery store while complaining about the lazy niggers on welfare.

Now if anybody understood any of that shit...here's what you are thinking, how is that any different than it's always been.  Well, it's not.  The difference is the numbers and percentages.  Rising immigrant population. Rising amount of welfare recipients.  Rising amounts of manu jobs lost (union).  And then add in the Dems latest big curve...Muslims (Middle-Eastern Americans ) forced acceptance into the population along with the continued millions expecting to start arriving here....

Now, all this is just the means to get to the end.....a HUGE and POWERFUL self full-filling and self entitled government.  Because if everyone needs them....you can't vote against them...right.  Don't need them?  Don't want to need them?  Open your mouth about it and see what happens.  Ask the Tea Party how that worked out for them within the IRS.  Ask the rest of us what we are called if we don't vote Dem?  Ask businesses what happens when they hire who and how they want to?  Ask small business what happens when they want to start growing their payrolls.  Rules, restrictions, red tape, policies, procedures................all put in place over the last 8 years to control the economic process...errrrr....rather "protect the citizens".  Yes....let's go with that.

Ahhh...that's better.  Now I'm gonna go stretch.  

[Zambroski]

36 minutes ago, racer254 said:

The dems will support anyone that will keep the current washington establishment going.  That is all that currently matters to them.

Damn...I could have just posted this instead.  

[Capt.Storm]

7 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Hang on....let's play a "whose on first" game.  And I'm not sure where it's going really....I just want to exercise my fingers.  

Democrats and welfare recipients go hand in hand.  So do union and Democrats.  But that is a self defeating prophecy.  Union people work, welfare folk do not...so, stands to reason, the union people are support the welfare recipients.  Democrats support labor union for their votes.  But labor unions with the support of the Democrats help drive major jobs out of the country..causing union unemployment and thus, no support for the welfare people.  Hmmmm....how can Dems stop this bleed?  Well, listen for the keywords: Infrastructure building/rebuilding (and of course EDUCATION..the "elite intellectuals" in the teachers UNIONS).  Bridges, roads, government buildings and government interests paid for with big government contracts.   Companies cannot outsource what needs to happen on American soil. Those are what will put trade unions in the voter seats.  And in turn, support the welfare vote.  Now for the sake of time...let's leave the mining sector out of this...that's comedy at a level I can't do right now.  The "Beaners"...well, they are a hard working bunch for the most part and just wanna stay here one way or another (legally or illegally).  Most of their income (taxes or not) tend to go back to help family and friends in their home country.  So, they are in for whoever is promising them the least amount of hassle while doing their "thang".  And that is not usually the taxpayers...or welfare recipients.  Ironically, they are on their own within the democratic community but their votes are staggeringly huge.  Immigrants take jobs that aren't being taken by the welfare recipients.  So, the black move down a notch on the labor pole.  Not that they were ever up one, it's just now there is another player between them and employment.  And then there is the "white trash".  And there are TONS of them too.  Most of them on a "welfare dole" are working lower class..a huge number on food stamps...and they vote too...but it is a kind of split due to a maybe unearned sense of pride, religious or race views, so they are a wash in the whole process.  Nothing funnier than a whitey getting the old food stamps out at the grocery store while complaining about the lazy niggers on welfare.

Now if anybody understood any of that shit...here's what you are thinking, how is that any different than it's always been.  Well, it's not.  The difference is the numbers and percentages.  Rising immigrant population. Rising amount of welfare recipients.  Rising amounts of manu jobs lost (union).  And then add in the Dems latest big curve...Muslims (Middle-Eastern Americans ) forced acceptance into the population along with the continued millions expecting to start arriving here....

Now, all this is just the means to get to the end.....a HUGE and POWERFUL self full-filling and self entitled government.  Because if everyone needs them....you can't vote against them...right.  Don't need them?  Don't want to need them?  Open your mouth about it and see what happens.  Ask the Tea Party how that worked out for them within the IRS.  Ask the rest of us what we are called if we don't vote Dem?  Ask businesses what happens when they hire who and how they want to?  Ask small business what happens when they want to start growing their payrolls.  Rules, restrictions, red tape, policies, procedures................all put in place over the last 8 years to control the economic process...errrrr....rather "protect the citizens".  Yes....let's go with that.

Ahhh...that's better.  Now I'm gonna go stretch.  

holy cluster fuck z-man!

you could just have said the dems are pretty much covering all the bases.

Edited August 24, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[racer254]

2 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Damn...I could have just posted this instead.  

Yeah, I used to try to explain it with examples like you typed.   I finally realized that I was speaking to the choir and the people who really need to understand the examples will just come up with more excuses and questions about specifics in the example.   

[Capt.Storm]

and as for whites it's not just the white trash that needs handouts..plenty run back to mommy and daddy after they find out their finger painting degree doesn't mean chit.

If you think much about it why would anyone vote r.

never mind..i know,i know.

Edited August 24, 2016 by Capt.Storm

[Capt.Storm]

the real question is how many can do it all on their own compared to how many need help..yeah..and it's getting worse.

[Zambroski]

2 minutes ago, racer254 said:

Yeah, I used to try to explain it with examples like you typed.   I finally realized that I was speaking to the choir and the people who really need to understand the examples will just come up with more excuses and questions about specifics in the example.   

Yeah, I know, that's what these places are about though.  And even if we weren't all pretty much in the same thought process, it's rare anything happens to convince us otherwise.  Although, I do enjoy a different viewpoint if it makes some type of logical sense and not just a bunch of nose thumbing, meme posting rhetoric from a fucking half-wit.  

Now there are forums for this type of uber serious political shit too...but they are very un-fun and taxing.  Like a science forum...go make a pot of coffee and sit down in one of those for an hour.  JEEEEZ!  It's just more fun to call people names and laugh.  I like it anyway.  As do most of us.

3 minutes ago, Capt.Storm said:

holy cluster fuck z-man!

you could just have said the dems are pretty covering all the bases.

I enjoy a jog around the town to check my mail sometimes.  

 

 

[Capt.Storm]

5 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Yeah, I know, that's what these places are about though.  And even if we weren't all pretty much in the same thought process, it's rare anything happens to convince us otherwise.  Although, I do enjoy a different viewpoint if it makes some type of logical sense and not just a bunch of nose thumbing, meme posting rhetoric from a fucking half-wit.  

Now there are forums for this type of uber serious political shit too...but they are very un-fun and taxing.  Like a science forum...go make a pot of coffee and sit down in one of those for an hour.  JEEEEZ!  It's just more fun to call people names and laugh.  I like it anyway.  As do most of us.

I enjoy a jog around the town to check my mail sometimes.  

 

 

i'm sure you know about all this ..but hey.

 

Rules for Radicals
Making America a Socialist Country

 

Both Obama and Hillary studied the book Rules for Radicals in college; Hillary did her senior thesis on the book and interviewed the author Saul Alinsky, who was a Communist. In the front of the book is a dedication to Lucifer. Below is an outline of the main points of the book on how to turn a country into a Communist State.