Edmo Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 20 minutes ago, Highmark said: That was a lie. They narrowed it down to 3. And it’s still questionable as they were not allowed to see the server before it was destroyed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted March 25, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted March 25, 2019 1 minute ago, Edmo said: And it’s still questionable as they were not allowed to see the server before it was destroyed. Absolutely. Also a number of former NSA guys said the documents presented show it was and inside job not a hack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 6 hours ago, Snoslinger said: using the legal sense of the word, that appears to be the case. that does not mean the trump admin did not work with people representing russian interests. it means not enough evidence was found to meet the legal requirements. And no affect on the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted March 25, 2019 Share Posted March 25, 2019 52 minutes ago, Highmark said: Absolutely. Also a number of former NSA guys said the documents presented show it was and inside job not a hack. Yes.....been covered extensively and retards put their fingers in their ears and screamed 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.