spin_dry Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2018/jul/16/donald-trump/missing-servers-donald-trump-vladimir-putin/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Skidooski Posted July 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 17, 2018 Too slow again Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spin_dry Posted July 17, 2018 Author Share Posted July 17, 2018 8 minutes ago, Skidooski said: Too slow again I debated on even posting it. chasing trump’s lies is getting old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 3 minutes ago, spin_dry said: I debated on even posting it. chasing trump’s lies is getting old. sorry.....your pathetic spin is stale. Find some other mainstream bullshit to choke on......this one dont hunt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 "We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute," Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 Yah......its an appropriate substitute to take the word of a 3rd party tech group that just happens to be DNC operatives. Fuck me to tears its so sad all there is to do is point and laugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rod Posted July 17, 2018 Share Posted July 17, 2018 It bewilders the fuck out of me that the intelligence agencies weren’t allowed to have the servers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted July 17, 2018 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 17, 2018 (edited) 31 minutes ago, f7ben said: "We got the forensics from the pros that they hired which -- again, best practice is always to get access to the machines themselves, but this, my folks tell me, was an appropriate substitute," The dots are all connected. You just have to be unbiased to see them. In its capacity as attorney for the DNC, Perkins Coie – through another of its partners, Michael Sussman – is also the law firm that retained CrowdStrike, the cyber security outfit, upon learning in April 2016 that the DNC’s servers had been hacked. Interesting: Despite the patent importance of the physical server system to the FBI and Intelligence-Community investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election, the Bureau never examined the DNC servers. Evidently, the DNC declined to cooperate to that degree, and the Obama Justice Department decided not to issue a subpoena to demand that the servers be turned over (just like the Obama Justice Department decided not to issue subpoenas to demand the surrender of critical physical evidence in the Clinton e-mails investigation). Instead, the conclusion that Russia is responsible for the invasion of the DNC servers rests on the forensic analysis conducted by CrowdStrike. Rather than do its own investigation, the FBI relied on a contractor retained by the DNC’s lawyers. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/scandals-collide-dossier-dnc-server-perkins-coie/ Edited July 17, 2018 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.