Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

How a 4-Hour Battle Between Russian Mercenaries and U.S. Commandos Unfolded in Syria


Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

You're the dumbfuck that think 30 Rangers took on 10 times as many Russians and are cheering USA USA. 

Flag waiving dumbfuck. 

 

Never said that or thought that.

Does all that jealous hatred of those better and smarter than you ever lead to purposeful activities?  Take a class or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

You're the dumbfuck that think 30 Rangers took on 10 times as many Russians and are cheering USA USA. 

Flag waiving dumbfuck. 

 

It’s about bringing a knife to a gunfight. A good example is what happened to the 4 green berets and several local soldiers in Niger when they were attacked by 20 militants. The 4 were sent on an assassination mission which had a very bad ending. They were miserably out gunned and had zero air support. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, spin_dry said:

It’s about bringing a knife to a gunfight. A good example is what happened to the 4 green berets and several local soldiers in Niger when they were attacked by 20 militants. The 4 were sent on an assassination mission which had a very bad ending. They were miserably out gunned and had zero air support. 

So the Rangers were better because they beat 10 times their number????

is that how this works?

It’s starting to look the way it did when Hollywood spent 30 years trying to win the Vietnam war with Chuck, Arnie and Stallone  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/23/2019 at 4:45 PM, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

We shouldn’t be there, it’s fucking retarded,  etc... But it makes me peen wiggle thinking about the fact 30 dudes ass fucked 300-500 Spetsnaz and Syrian special forces guys with tanks without even breaking a sweat. 

I listened to the Russian radio transmissions from it somewhere. It sounded like a nightmare. What did they think would happen when they measured dicks with Delta and Rangers? 

 

34 minutes ago, Zambroski said:

Never said that or thought that.

Does all that jealous hatred of those better and smarter than you ever lead to purposeful activities?  Take a class or something.

It’s hard to tell one flag waiving fucktard from the next. 

But only because I don’t give a shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

So the Rangers were better because they beat 10 times their number????

is that how this works?

It’s starting to look the way it did when Hollywood spent 30 years trying to win the Vietnam war with Chuck, Arnie and Stallone  

 

Each branch of the military claims that they’re the best or most effective. Truth is that they all depend on one another to fulfill a mission. In the end, it’s alway the guys on the ground that not only take the big beating, but are most responsible to either win or lose a battle. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

You're the dumbfuck that think 30 Rangers took on 10 times as many Russians and are cheering USA USA. 

Flag waiving dumbfuck. 

 

You just don’t get it. Rangers, SF, Seals, Delta, etc aren’t only good because they shoot better. They command assets that no other military or force does. All the air power in the world and all the fancy toys are only useful when deployed properly. No one deploys assets like the above guys. Sorry you don’t understand modern war, but it’s more than how you shoot and move.

Then again all those guys above shoot and move infinitely better than any other adversary we have. Your own SF being included as elite like the above. Why? Because unlike Russia, China, whomever, we’ve been doing it since 2001. Our NCO’s and officers in those ranks have every asset, every piece of training (designed and refined by 20 years of combat), and actual real world experience that Spetsnaz or some banana republic SOF dude will ever have in 100 lifetimes.

That’s why 30 dudes can lay waste to 300. This isn’t a fluke. American SOF forces, British, Canada, Polish, and all the others who’ve been dropping people since 2001 are on a different level. 

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

So the Rangers were better because they beat 10 times their number????

is that how this works?

It’s starting to look the way it did when Hollywood spent 30 years trying to win the Vietnam war with Chuck, Arnie and Stallone  

 

Rangers are better because of their design and outfitting. A force on force battle isn’t Delta’s thing... That’s Ranger bread and butter. When you’re done being embarrassed, let me know. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spin_dry said:

Each branch of the military claims that they’re the best or most effective. Truth is that they all depend on one another to fulfill a mission. In the end, it’s alway the guys on the ground that not only take the big beating, but are most responsible to either win or lose a battle. 

And no one is better than the guys that fly our planes. 20 years of dropping bombs make you really fucking good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

You just don’t get it. Rangers, SF, Seals, Delta, etc aren’t only good because they shoot better. They command assets that no other military or force does. All the air power in the world and all the fancy toys are only useful when deployed properly. No one deploys assets like the above guys. Sorry you don’t understand modern war, but it’s more than how you shoot and move.

Then again all those guys above shoot and move infinitely better than any other adversary we have. Your own SF being included as elite like the above. Why? Because unlike Russia, China, whomever, we’ve been doing it since 2001. Our NCO’s and officers in those ranks have every asset, every piece of training (designed and refined by 20 years of combat), and actual real world experience that Spetsnaz or some banana republic SOF dude will ever have in 100 lifetimes.

That’s why 30 dudes can lay waste to 300. This isn’t a fluke. American SOF forces, British, Canada, Polish, and all the others who’ve been dropping people since 2001 are on a different level. 

Rangers are better because of their design and outfitting. A force on force battle isn’t Delta’s thing... That’s Ranger bread and butter. When you’re done being embarrassed, let me know. 

He calls it “winning”.  I mean... :lol:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

And no one is better than the guys that fly our planes. 20 years of dropping bombs make you really fucking good. 

What about those creepy SOG guys with the CIA? What’s their deal? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

You just don’t get it. Rangers, SF, Seals, Delta, etc aren’t only good because they shoot better. They command assets that no other military or force does. All the air power in the world and all the fancy toys are only useful when deployed properly. No one deploys assets like the above guys. Sorry you don’t understand modern war, but it’s more than how you shoot and move.

Then again all those guys above shoot and move infinitely better than any other adversary we have. Your own SF being included as elite like the above. Why? Because unlike Russia, China, whomever, we’ve been doing it since 2001. Our NCO’s and officers in those ranks have every asset, every piece of training (designed and refined by 20 years of combat), and actual real world experience that Spetsnaz or some banana republic SOF dude will ever have in 100 lifetimes.

That’s why 30 dudes can lay waste to 300. This isn’t a fluke. American SOF forces, British, Canada, Polish, and all the others who’ve been dropping people since 2001 are on a different level. 

Rangers are better because of their design and outfitting. A force on force battle isn’t Delta’s thing... That’s Ranger bread and butter. When you’re done being embarrassed, let me know. 

Your original statement was 30 rangers and you are still trying to play that off as true. 

They would have been slaughtered without air support.  Doesn’t matter how many times you chant USA. 

You remind me of that fat fuck US General during gulf war one. He called out the Britts for losing more planes.  The British general trotted out the accuracy of the British bombing vs USA. 

I think he said something along the line of “That’s because we fly low enough to hit the target the first time instead of having to fly 3 or 4 sorties for the same target. “

Fat boy had to shut up after that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

And no one is better than the guys that fly our planes. 20 years of dropping bombs make you really fucking good. 

Got to give you credit on this one 

a couple of trillion spent on wars is fantastic R&D.   Thanks Bush. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

Your original statement was 30 rangers and you are still trying to play that off as true. 

They would have been slaughtered without air support.  Doesn’t matter how many times you chant USA. 

You remind me of that fat fuck US General during gulf war one. He called out the Britts for losing more planes.  The British general trotted out the accuracy of the British bombing vs USA. 

I think he said something along the line of “That’s because we fly low enough to hit the target the first time instead of having to fly 3 or 4 sorties for the same target. “

Fat boy had to shut up after that. 

Whoosh. I understand what it means when Rangers get in a fire fight... But keep pretending like I meant they didn’t have air assets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, revkevsdi said:

Got to give you credit on this one 

a couple of trillion spent on wars is fantastic R&D.   Thanks Bush. 

Yah...I mean Obama was totally powerless to stop dropping 3 bombs an hour for his 8 straight years......and Hillary had always voted against war

Dumbass fucking faggot

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, spin_dry said:

Sneaky fucks  

Those are the guys working with the contractors with almost unlimited funds and all the support they need to get done what needs to get done without bullshit PR and candy-assed dip shits getting in the way.  

Lock and load and go In hot!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

Worship would be sucking them off. Explaining the truth to rev is a little different. 

 

Just now, Zambroski said:

Those are the guys working with the contractors with almost unlimited funds and all the support they need to get done what needs to get done without bullshit PR and candy-assed dip shits getting in the way.  

Lock and load and go In hot!  

 

Just now, f7ben said:

Wasnt speaking about you

Yuh....see above

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Zambroski said:

Those are the guys working with the contractors with almost unlimited funds and all the support they need to get done what needs to get done without bullshit PR and candy-assed dip shits getting in the way.  

Lock and load and go In hot!  

Now you’re just being silly  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...