XCR1250

Nothing I've bought has doubled, recently bought over $6,000 in tools, prices were close to what they were 5 years ago.

I've heard that for Decades.

'Deal with the devil.' Secret Biden-McConnell deal on anti-abortion GOP judge enrages Democrats Joe SonkaAndrew Wolfson Louisville Courier Journal LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Democrats are blasting President Joe Biden for agreeing to nominate an anti-abortion Republican to a lifetime federal judgeship in Kentucky, less than a week after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. "The president is making a deal with the devil and once again" and "the people of Kentucky are crushed in the process," Democratic U.S. Senate candidate Charles Booker tweeted after The Courier Journal broke the story Wednesday night. "At a time when we are fighting to protect human rights, this is a complete slap in the face." U.S. Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Louisville, who confirmed Biden is poised to nominate Chad Meredith to U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, called it a "huge mistake." More:Kentucky abortion clinics to reopen after judge grants temporary order "Why you would pick him to fill a federal vacancy when you're a Democratic president is beyond me." Yarmuth said the nomination is bad not only because Meredith is anti-abortion but because of his actions in the general counsel office when he helped former Kentucky Gov. Matt Bevin issue hundreds of controversial pardons at the end of his term that spurred outrage and a federal investigation. Gov. Andy Beshear, said Thursday he also strongly opposes the pick, saying his team was informed last week that Biden intended to nominate Meredith. Beshear said his understanding is that Biden has not yet submitted the nomination, “which I hope means in the very least it's on pause. “If the president makes that nomination, it is indefensible.” A GOP candidate in exchange for no more blocked nominees? Biden was poised to nominate Meredith presumably as the result of an undisclosed deal with U.S. Mitch McConnell, Yarmuth told The Courier Journal. McConnell has blocked the nominations of two lawyers for U.S. attorney positions there were recommended by Yarmuth. The presumption is that with Meredith's nomination, McConnell would agree not to hold up future federal nominations from the Biden White house, Yarmuth said. "We were informed by White House staff that this nomination was coming," Yarmuth said. "I expressed my objections to it in the strongest terms I use." Robert Steurer, a spokesman for McConnell, said he would have no comment until Biden makes his nomination. There are currently no open federal judgeships in Eastern Kentucky. However, Eastern District Judge Danny C. Reeves is eligible for senior status when he turns 65 years old Aug. 1, while Judge Karen Caldwell is already eligible. Neither Reeves nor Caldwell could be reached for comment. Yarmuth said "clearly someone has agreed to resign and we don't know what deal has been made with that person, and I think that's something to media needs to try to figure out." Beshear: Bevin pardons should be disqualifying Beshear said Meredith should be disqualified from a nomination for his work on Bevin's controversial pardons and commutations, saying Meredith “aided and advised on the most egregious abuse of power by a governor in my lifetime.” The Courier Journal reported in 2020 that Meredith was one of the staff attorneys involved in string of controversial acts of clemency Bevin doled out at the end of his term in 2019. Bevin administration documents showed Meredith was one of Bevin's general counsel staff to give recommendations to the governor on whether certain applicants deserve clemency. More:What to know about Kentucky abortion services after the trigger law ban was suspended One spreadsheet of clemency applicants from those records showed "Chad working" written next to the name of Patrick Baker — one of the most controversial pardon recipients, who was convicted of killing a man in a robbery and whose family hosted a fundraiser for Bevin at his home. “If you are a lawyer that advised on that and went along with it, you should be disqualified from serving in a role where you would hand out sentences," Beshear said. "I mean, these are individuals who are pardoned who are walking free today, despite committing terrible violent crimes.” Meredith’s personal lawyer, Brandon Marshall, has told The Courier Journal Meredith had "no meaningful involvement with any of the most controversial pardons about which the media has made much.” Directing his attention back to Biden, Beshear added: “I don't know how the president could say he's for public safety if he makes this nomination.” 'A deal with the devil' Booker, who is challenging Sen. Rand Paul for his seat, reacted with even harsher criticism to news of Meredith's pending nomination on Twitter, writing, "This is some bulls---." "The president is making a deal with the devil, and once again, the people of Kentucky are crushed in the process," Booker tweeted. "At a time when we are fighting to protect human rights, this is a complete slap in the face." A White House spokesman declined to speak on the nomination, saying "we do not comment on vacancies." Sign up:On Kentucky Politics newsletter delivered to your inbox weekly Yarmuth said the Meredith nomination is obviously "some kind of effort to appease Mitch McConnell, which is something this state and country should be very upset about." "Mitch McConnell was not elected by anyone outside of Kentucky, yet he is imposing his individual will on the federal judiciary and the president of the United States just because he has the power to do it, not because it makes sense good sense for our country." Nicole Erwin, the spokeswoman for Planned Parenthood Alliance Advocates-Kentucky, issued a statement that did not directly address the Biden nomination but expressed concern. "We need judges in place that prioritize the health and wellbeing of people in Kentucky and reflect the diversity and progressive values of the nation now more than ever — that means nominating qualified and unbiased judges to the bench,” Erwin said. Nominee a Federalist Society member Meredith is a Federalist Society member who served as deputy counsel to Bevin and more recently solicitor general for Attorney General Daniel Cameron. Cameron is now a candidate for the Republican nomination for governor in 2023. He defended a 2017 Kentucky abortion law requiring doctors who perform abortions to first perform an ultrasound and describe the image to the patient, losing first at a trial in federal court before the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later upheld the statute. As the top appellate lawyer for Cameron, Meredith also successfully defended a state law in the Kentucky Supreme Court that stripped Gov. Beshear of his emergency power to implement COVID-19 restrictions. More:Judge grants temporary order to restore abortion access in Kentucky Meredith was being vetted for a federal judgeship in 2020 by President Donald Trump’s administration but was later dropped from consideration for that position. He is a longtime member of the Federalist Society, from which Trump drew nominees for the Supreme Court and other judgeships. Meredith previously practiced as a litigator with Frost Brown Todd in Louisville and Ransdell & Roach of Lexington. Since leaving the attorney general's office in January, he has worked at Cincinnati law firm Squire Patton Boggs. Reporter Caleb Stultz contributed to this story. Reach reporter Joe Sonka at jsonka@courierjournal.com and follow him on Twitter at @joesonka. Support strong local journalism by subscribing today at the top of this page.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/30/us/sonny-barger-dead-hells-angels.html

ROUND 2 — Fauci reports COVID rebound, says his is “much worse” than initial illness Fauci took a second round of Paxlovid, which is at odds with the FDA and CDC stance. BETH MOLE - 6/29/2022, 4:43 PM Director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci at Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 17, 2022 in Washington, DC. Enlarge / Director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Anthony Fauci at Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill May 17, 2022 in Washington, DC. Getty | Alex Wong The country's top infectious disease expert, Anthony Fauci, has been struck by a phenomenon that appears to be becoming more common in the latest stage of the pandemic—rebounding bouts of COVID-19 after a course of the antiviral drug Paxlovid. COVID rebounds: Immune responses may be reignited by cleanup of viral scraps In an interview Tuesday at Foreign Policy's Global Health Forum, Fauci recounted the progression of his infection to his current rebound, which he said has been much worse than his first round with the disease. Fauci—the director of the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and chief medical advisor to the president—is 81 years old and has been fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and boosted twice. He first tested positive on a rapid antigen test on June 15 and experienced "very minimal symptoms." But his symptoms worsened and he began a five-day course of Paxlovid. "And I felt really quite well," Fauci said, adding that he just had mild nasal congestion and fatigue. When he had finished the five-day course, he had reverted to negative on antigen tests for three consecutive days. But, "then on the fourth day—just to be absolutely certain—I tested myself again, and I reverted back to positive … and then over the next day or so I started to feel really poorly, much worse than in the first go-around." Fauci subsequently went back on Paxlovid for another five-day course. "Right now, I'm on my fourth day of a five-day course of my second course of Paxlovid," he said Tuesday. "And, fortunately, I feel reasonably good, I mean, I'm not completely without symptoms, but I certainly don't feel acutely ill." Conflicting treatment advice Fauci's second course of treatment conflicts with the stance of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. In a May 24 health advisory, the CDC wrote, "There is currently no evidence that additional treatment for COVID-19 is needed for COVID-19 rebound. Based on data available at this time, patient monitoring continues to be the most appropriate management for patients with recurrence of symptoms after completion of a treatment course of Paxlovid." Likewise, the FDA also stated in May that "there is no evidence of benefit at this time for a longer course of treatment … or repeating a treatment course of Paxlovid in patients with recurrent COVID-19 symptoms following completion of a treatment course." However, Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer, which makes Paxlovid, said that a second Paxlovid course could be used to treat rebound cases. Beyond questions of how best to treat rebounds, it's also unclear how common they are or why they happen. The CDC notes that resurgent symptoms of COVID-19 are not unique to people taking Paxlovid. "A brief return of symptoms may be part of the natural history of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) infection in some persons, independent of treatment with Paxlovid and regardless of vaccination status," the agency wrote in its health alert. That squares with Pfizer's initial clinical data on Paxlovid, which found that about 1 percent to 2 percent of both the treatment and placebo groups had rebounds in trials. But, with more people now taking Paxlovid, anecdotal reports of post-Paxlovid rebounds appear prevalent on social media. Experts are also still figuring out why rebounds happen. Last week, researchers at Fauci's NIAID reported encouraging preliminary data from a small study suggesting that rebounds are partly due to immune responses getting reignited as the body clears dead human cells and viral debris in the aftermath of a quickly smothered infection. The study found no evidence of more concerning potential explanations for rebounds, such as the possibility that SARS-CoV-2 is mutating to thwart Paxlovid or that people's immune systems fail to protect against the virus. Moreover, limited data published by the CDC suggests that those who have a rebound do not tend to end up suffering more severe COVID-19, requiring hospitalization or emergency care.

https://scitechdaily.com/sea-corals-found-to-be-a-source-of-an-elusive-anti-cancer-compound/

Lots of 40's at night here lately, very odd.

Close this content, you can also use the Escape key at anytime Video shows officer hit unarmed Kennedale man 16 times with flashlight in face: lawsuit Domingo Ramirez Jr. Wed, June 29, 2022, 5:00 AM A Kennedale man has filed a federal lawsuit against two North Texas police officers on claims of excessive use of force, stemming from a 2020 incident when he alleges he was struck 16 times in the face with an officer’s metal flashlight. The man fled from several officers but later stopped and also was hit in the head with an officer’s gun multiple times, according to the suit. Police dashboard and body cameras recorded video of one of the defendants striking Clinton Grimsley with the flashlight and later saying, according to the suit, that “we roughed him up pretty good. It will be a significant use of force. I ended up getting a bunch of blood in my mouth — it’s like a bitter taste.” Grimsley’s attorneys filed the lawsuit in April in Fort Worth. The lawsuit identified the defendants as Kennedale Officer Christoper Kjelsen and Mansfield Officer Brian Raines. “This case is a clear example of when an officer exceeds the level of force required in a given situation by using excessive deadly force in violation of the Constitution,” said James Roberts of Addison, one of Grimsley’s attorneys, in an email. “Mr. Grimsley was unarmed and restrained by multiple officers on the ground when Officer Brian Raines of the Mansfield Police Department struck him sixteen times in the face with a metal flashlight, causing predictable and significant injuries.” Kennedale Police Chief Darrell Hull declined to comment on the lawsuit. Mansfield police said they would not comment on a pending lawsuit. In a court document filed June 13 in answer to the suit, Kjelsen admitted that Grimsley was hit in the head during a struggle, but the officer said that Grimsley refused to comply, fought officers and tried to get control of Kjelsen’s Taser and handgun. Kjelsen’s response says that Grimsley hit and injured more than one officer and the force used by police was reasonable. On the same day, Raines also filed a response in federal court, saying he denied violating Grimsley’s rights and denied that any force used was unjustified. Raines admitted that he hit Grimsley in the head, “at times with his hand alone and at times with his flashlight in his hand” but denied hitting him 16 times and denied laughing about the use of force, according to the document. Both officers also assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity from federal claims. Grimsley’s lawsuit gave this account of the incident: On the night of April 11, 2020, Kennedale officers Brian Andrews and Charles Burns were dispatched to Grimsley’s Kennedale home, responding to calls that Grimsley was starting fires in his front yard and beating on his porch with an object. Burns and Andrews encountered Grimsley as he walked from the side of his home, and they ordered him to drop a toy sword he was carrying and put his hands up. Grimsley complied, and he then was ordered to sit down on the front porch. Burns asked him if needed to talk to a doctor and Grimsley said, “That’s why I was praying.” Burns ordered Grimsley to stand up so he could check for any weapons. Officers removed a pocketknife from his pocket and began to handcuff him, but Grimsley fled from them when he feared that they were going to hurt him, the suit says. Grimsley ran away with one arm handcuffed. Officer Kjelsen drove up, pointed his gun at Grimsley and instructed him to get on the ground. Grimsley got down and stretched his arms away from his body. Kjelsen wrote in a police report that he ran up to Grimsley and tripped and fell on Grimsley’s back. The lawsuit said that the officer’s body camera showed that Kjelsen ran up to Grimsley and kicked him in the head. The camera showed that Grimsley was not threatening any officer or person at the time, according to the suit. Kjelsen then got on top of Grimsley and pistol-whipped Grimsley in the back of the head, striking him several times, the suit says. Several minutes later, Raines, the Mansfield officer, arrived on the scene and almost immediately began hitting Grimsley in the face with a flashlight, according to the suit. Raines’ body camera recorded him hitting Grimsley 16 times with his metal flashlight, the suit says. Clinton Grimsley was lying face down when a Mansfield, Texas police officer beat him with a flashlight, according to a lawsuit. Raines made several statements after Grimsley was placed in a patrol vehicle, according to the video, saying, “Nah, I was hitting him pretty good, and got a (expletive) ton of blood in my mouth.” Raines added, “I punched him and struck him with the flashlight to the face,” the lawsuit says. “That’s where the injuries are going to be from.” Roberts, the attorney, said that “Officer Raines laughed and talked flippantly about getting his flashlight dirty when he bloodied it beating Mr. Grimsley to a pulp. This is the type of behavior that must be extinguished from police departments before communities will fully trust that law enforcement is truly here to protect and serve.” Grimsley’s injuries were so severe, according to the suit, that a paramedic at the scene expressed concern to the officers, saying, “I don’t know if he’s opened something up but now, he’s bleeding real bad. He’s bleeding in the head real bad right now. He’s soaking up that mask real bad. Will the jail take him like that?” Clinton Grimsley was profusely bleeding after suffering injuries he sustained from police officers from Kennedale and Mansfield, according to a lawsuit. Grimsley suffered several lacerations to his face and head, a fractured left orbital floor and permanent scarring, the lawsuit says. As of last week, Kjelsen was still an officer with Kennedale police. Raines is a sergeant with Mansfield police. Grimsley was charged with assault on a peace officer, evading arrest and resisting arrest, according to Tarrant County criminal court records. The assaulting a peace officer charge was dismissed, but he was sentenced to 150 days in jail on the other two charges, according to court records. Grimsley was sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2002 on a murder charge for killing his father in August 2001. He beat his father to death with the butt of a shotgun.

MC is the most misinformed guy/gal on this site.

She's not wrong

https://www.aol.com/news/more-1-million-voters-switch-040817454-093023299.html

First, what is an ice age? It’s when the Earth has cold temperatures for a long time – millions to tens of millions of years – that lead to ice sheets and glaciers covering large areas of its surface. We know that the Earth has had at least five major ice ages. The first one happened about 2 billion years ago and lasted about 300 million years. The most recent one started about 2.6 million years ago, and in fact, we are still technically in it. Read news coverage based on evidence, not tweets Get newsletter So why isn’t the Earth covered in ice right now? It’s because we are in a period known as an “interglacial.” In an ice age, temperatures will fluctuate between colder and warmer levels. Ice sheets and glaciers melt during warmer phases, which are called interglacials, and expand during colder phases, which are called glacials. Right now we are in the most recent ice age’s warm interglacial period, which began about 11,000 years ago. Earth’s climate goes through warming and cooling cycles that are influenced by gases in its atmosphere and variations in its orbit around the sun. What was it like during the ice age? When most people talk about the “ice age,” they are usually referring to the last glacial period, which began about 115,000 years ago and ended about 11,000 years ago with the start of the current interglacial period. During that time, the planet was much cooler than it is now. At its peak, when ice sheets covered most of North America, the average global temperature was about 46 degrees Fahrenheit (8 degrees Celsius). That’s 11 degrees F (6 degrees C) cooler than the global annual average today. That difference might not sound like a lot, but it resulted in most of North America and Eurasia being covered in ice sheets. Earth was also much drier, and sea level was much lower, since most of the Earth’s water was trapped in the ice sheets. Steppes, or dry grassy plains, were common. So were savannas, or warmer grassy plains, and deserts. Many animals present during the ice age would be familiar to you, including brown bears, caribou and wolves. But there were also megafauna that went extinct at the end of the ice age, like mammoths, mastodons, saber-toothed cats and giant ground sloths. There are different ideas about why these animals went extinct. One is that humans hunted them into extinction when they came in contact with the megafauna. Excavating a mastodon skeleton at Burning Tree Golf Course in Heath, Ohio, December 1989. The skeleton, found by workers who were digging a pond, was 90% to 95% complete and more than 11,000 years old. James St. John/Flickr, CC BY Wait, there were humans during the ice age?! Yes, people just like us lived through the ice age. Since our species, Homo sapiens, emerged about 300,000 years ago in Africa, we have spread around the world. During the ice age, some populations remained in Africa and did not experience the full effects of the cold. Others moved into other parts of the world, including the cold, glacial environments of Europe. And they weren’t alone. At the beginning of the ice age, there were other species of hominins – a group that includes our immediate ancestors and our closest relatives – throughout Eurasia, like the Neanderthals in Europe and the mysterious Denisovans in Asia. Both of these groups seem to have gone extinct before the end of the ice age. There are lots of ideas about how our species survived the ice age when our hominin cousins did not. Some think that it has to do with how adaptable we are, and how we used our social and communication skills and tools. And it appears that humans didn’t hunker down during the ice age. Instead they moved into new areas. For a long time it was thought that humans did not enter North America until after the ice sheets started to melt. But fossilized footprints found at White Sands National Park in New Mexico show that humans have been in North America since at least 23,000 years ago – close to the peak of the last ice age.

The Devil and the Death Shots The United States is the only country in the world now injecting children under 5 with the COVID-19 vaccine. By Karen Hunt June 26, 2022 Iam energized. I’m angry. I’m more determined than ever to stand against this evil. What got to me was a photo of Joe Biden holding an innocent baby reaching up to touch his masked face. Biden the Idiot. The court buffoon. The puppet hobbling along, falling off his bike, staring into space, saying weird and unintelligible things, guided along by his poor little wife and his anxious handlers, setting the example for the masses so that they, too, will happily be led along. Close your eyes, shut off your mind. Yes, that photo brought it all together and made it difficult for me to contain my rage. If ever I was convinced our government leaders serve the Devil—the actual Devil—that photo brought it home. No mincing of words today. And then the headline associated the photo: “Biden visits clinic, celebrates COVID shots for kids under 5.” Celebrates. He celebrates that 17 million more children, down to the age of 6 months, are now eligible for the death shot. Six months-old, surely that will be the end of it. But you know what? They still aren’t satisfied. Those CEOs at Pfizer and Moderna, Albert Bourla and Stéphane Bancel, are in a little competition with one another. Who can inject the most babies and make the biggest profit? Moderna is wasting no time: “Moderna to Study Its Covid-19 Vaccine in Babies as Young as 3 Months,” reports the Wall Street Journal. As many as 700 infants would be enrolled to test proper doses for ages 3 months to 6 months. This evil is out of control. Where are the angels, the warriors? How does one fight against an enemy that cannot be attacked by sword or reason? Visiting the Washington, D.C. clinic where the first shots were being administered, Biden proudly proclaimed to parents: “Relief, isn’t it? Being able to do it? We’re the only country in the world doing this right now.” Turning his dead eyes on one young girl, the White House occupant said, “This is a great place for you all. We’re going to beat this thing. You’ll be able to go anywhere you want.” You’ll be able to go anywhere you want. What kid doesn’t like the sound of that? Freedom! Just like any drug pusher on the street, take this little pill and you’ll fly. Except you will always and forever be their slave. Come on just this one shot—or is it two or three or infinity? And then, who knows? Maybe when you’re 10 years old, you’ll want to change your sex, something your school will encourage you to do. By then, you’ll be so pumped full of drugs and used to it, what will be the harm of adding puberty blockers to the mix? Don’t worry, you won’t even need your parents’ permission. Shh! don’t tell them! The state will take care of you. We will oh-so-lovingly pick you apart, piece by piece, and then put you back together again, scarred and addicted to our drugs forever. Or maybe we won’t put you back together again. Maybe we will extract your organs, your cells, your DNA, your young, fresh blood, so that the elite can tinker and play with it, finding ways to live longer while you die. Think about it. All of these drugs and procedures are being approved. By the Biden puppet regime—owned by the pharmaceutical companies. They want every person in the United States to be an addict, starting at birth, or if they can achieve it, before birth. Little by little by little the public has been led to believe they cannot survive without their injections, pills, patches, and microchips. Shame on us for not stopping it sooner. Because there were plenty of opportunities to stand up and refuse if we had just paid attention. They did it with Ritalin, in 2011, lowering the age of prescription to 4 years-old. Ritalin was an important “gateway” drug easing parents into accepting governmental control of their children. Never mind that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration categorizes Ritalin in the same class of highly addictive drugs as cocaine, morphine and opium. Some severe side effects of Ritalin include: cardiovascular reactions, including sudden death, stroke, and heart attack; increased blood pressure; increased heart rate (tachycardia); psychiatric adverse reactions, including worsening of a pre-existing psychiatric condition; development of new psychotic or manic symptoms; sustained and sometimes painful erections in males; poor circulation, including Raynaud’s phenomenon; long-term suppression of growth and weight loss in pediatric patients; potential for abuse and dependence. And yet, if a psychiatrist determines that a child has a mental “disorder” (ADHD) based on a checklist of behaviors such as “loses pencils or toys,” “often does not seem to listen,” “is easily distracted by extraneous stimuli,” “fidgets” or “runs about or climbs excessively in situations when it is not appropriate” he or she may be administered this drug. Parents agreed, willingly sedating their children in order to comply with the state. We complain about injecting our children with an mRNA gene therapy. Yet, vaccines previously given to our children contained poisons like mercury, or ethylmercury (commonly known as thimerosal). A CounterPunch article in 2012 lays bare how the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), surely an organization parents should be able to trust, vehemently opposed the United Nations proposed “binding treaty to ban ethylmercury from all medications and vaccines worldwide. In the December 17, 2012, issue of Pediatrics, former AAP president Louis Cooper wrote: This despite its official position on mercury being made clear as far back as July 2001: “The developing fetus and young children are thought to be disproportionately affected by mercury exposure, because many aspects of development, particularly brain maturation, can be disturbed by the presence of mercury. Minimizing mercury exposure is, therefore, essential to optimal child health.” Isn’t it amazing how “science” changes its position to validate the agendas of powerful drug companies?

Lake I lived on had 5 gun clubs, I shot Trap for years, was lots of fun.

Imagine MC at a Gun Range, yeesh.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/26/business/retail-returns/index.html

Libs are just plain stupid.

Yup, Boomers start in 1946, Biden was born in 1942.

Except he's not a Boomer, he's too old.

I know the Titanium shafts I used were hard to drill and machine.

Nigerian couple charged with plotting to get child to UK to harvest organs Fri, June 24, 2022, 1:36 AM Ike Ekweremadu Nigerian politician LONDON (Reuters) - A Nigerian senator and his wife were remanded in custody in London on Thursday charged with plotting to have a 15-year-old boy brought into the United Kingdom to harvest his organs, the BBC and police said. Ike Ekweremadu, 60, and Beatrice Nwanneka Ekweremadu, 55, were both charged with conspiracy to arrange travel of another person with a view to exploitation, namely organ harvesting, police said. Ekweremadu is an opposition senator in the southern state of Enugu, and also a former deputy senate president. Police said they had been alerted to the alleged plan following reports made of possible offences under modern slavery legislation. The child involved has been taken to safety and work was under way to provide additional support. The couple appeared at Uxbridge Magistrates' Court in London where the court was told the child involved was a 15-year-old boy, the BBC reported. The prosecution told the court that the Attorney General's consent was required for the case to proceed because of jurisdictional issues, the BBC added, and the couple were remanded in custody until the next court appearance on July 7. Neither Ekweremadu nor his wife could be reached for comment. (Reporting by Michael Holden in London and additional reporting by MacDonald Dzirutwe in Lagos; editing by William James and Nick Macfie)

https://news.yahoo.com/had-gender-confirmation-surgery-heres-130217921.html

"The Buck Stops Here" He's the 1st. President I recall as a young child.

They'll say anything to convince people to buy EV junk.

Yup, the Greenie idiots are born every day.