odot1

Orrrr…  fricken sharks with lasers....

53 minutes ago, Bigfish said:

Not sure if you can answer this one?

We attended a family BBQ on the weekend.  The party was held on a relative's 100 acre property, well away from the neighbours (the neighbour was invited and attended).

At some point during the evening we noticed a drone circling the party. When it noticed that several people were pointing at it, it rose in elevation but stayed overhead. There was some talk about shooting it down, but I was able to convince them that discharging a firearm would probably result in more of a problem.

Question, what is the law concerning drones? Are they allowed to spy on you? Can they be shot down? How can you stop them from flying over head?

Thanks for this venue to ask questions.

DO NOT SHOOT AT THE DRONE!!!!!!  (as tempting/fun as it would be)

You would create so many new problems for yourself.  Get as much detail as possible about it, where it came from, direction of flight etc.  Report all to local police, also Transport Canada has online reporting tools.  The base for it can't be  that far away unless it's some sort of Gov't drone, which I doubt it was.  If you're going to "shoot" at it...  try a high pressure water stream.  The potato gun idea is interesting.  But have to watch velocities so you don't enter into criminal code territory.

Sean

http://www.tc.gc.ca/en/services/aviation/drone-safety/flying-drone-safely-legally.html#permission

Rules for recreational drones

To fly a recreational drone (or model aircraft), you must follow the safety rules in the Interim Order Respecting the Use of Model Aircraft.

Review these rules before flying a drone for fun, if the drone weighs over 250 g and under 35 kg. If your drone is 250 g or less, read our tips for flying safe.

Following the safety rules helps keep people, aircraft and property safe. If you fly where you are not allowed or you break the rules below, you could be fined up to $3,000.

Fly your drone:

• below 90 m above the ground
• at least 30 m away from vehicles, vessels and the public (if your drone weighs over 250 g and up to 1 kg)
• at least 76 m away from vehicles, vessels and the public (if your drone weighs over 1 kg and up to 35 kg)
• at least 5.6 km away from aerodromes (any airport, seaplane base or area where aircraft take off and land)
• at least 1.9 km away from heliports or aerodromes used by helicopters only
• outside of controlled or restricted airspace
• at least 9 km away from a natural hazard or disaster area
• away from areas where its use could interfere with police or first responders
• during the day and not in clouds
• within your sight at all times
• within 500 m of yourself
• only if clearly marked with your name, address and telephone number

You are exempt from these rules if you are at a field or event approved by the Model Aeronautics Association of Canada.

http://www.tc.gc.ca/en/services/aviation/drone-safety/proposed-rules-drones-canada.html

Rupe and I at last years event.  Thanks to the generosity of FS'ers We surpassed our $500, $600, $700 goals.  Now pushing for $800.  Thanks all!!!!!

Thanks Tim!!  Appreciated very much...  new goal..  again!!   

9 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Here is my Red and Coyote on the deck today.

They are part of the family.  Nothing we would not do for them.

 

 

 

Great pic!!  Thanks for sharing!!!!!!!  

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Just sent hope you got it.

I did!!     Very generous, thank you so much!

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Will send something later.  Happy trails Rupert, you're in good hands.

Thanks!!!!!

Thanks @Poncho dogs, eh?!?!

Thanks @Frostynuts!!!!    Loved the message BTW!!  Me too!!

17 minutes ago, irv said:

Donation sent, Sean.

Thanks for all you do! 

Thanks @irv !!  You're always there helping each year!!!!   

A late start this year... but....

!Every year Rupert and I raise funds to give back to the organization that saved his life and enriched mine.  I know money is tight and I don't want anyone to feel any pressure to donate.  We are accepting positive thoughts and comments as well!!!  As many know, Rupert was hit by a car Christmas eve 2009.  I found him while on duty Christmas morning.  He was in the median of the 401 and had been there so long his body heat melted the ice and snow leaving him in a puddle of water.  Despite several broken bones in his left rear leg and a blown out right rear knee he did not whimper, bark or bite when I picked him up.  I could hear his bones grinding... but he was tough!!  and stubborn...soooo very stubborn.  A plea for his owner went out... he was only about a year old and obviously some ones pet.  Turned out he was owned by a violent drug dealer who used to beat on him (drug dealer burned to death in deal gone bad 6mnths later). The plea brought in enough donations to fix Rupert's injuries and with the donation of an amazing rehab vet, Dr Cherie White he learned to walk again!!  He can now chase down rabbits and squirrels!!!  Please add your own stories to this thread as well!!!  I've attached the donation site... They finally accept  PayPal this year!!  You guys have helped me raise the most money each year since I've started.   I can't thank you enough for that!!!!! !  I've attached the donation site...  This year they finally accept PayPal!!!   You guys have helped me raise the most money each year since I've started.   I can't thank you enough for that!!!!!

Donations here > https://www.canadahelps.org/en/charities/the-kingston-humane-society/p2p/bigpaws2018/page/sean-and-rupert-giving-back/

From a local media interview:

The story of Rupert

“Rupert was struck by a car early Christmas morning 2009 on a bleak stretch of the 401 highway just west of Kingston. The stalwart Lab was found in a ditch where he'd dragged himself after suffering severe injuries to both hind legs, including a shattered femur and badly torn ligaments. OPP officer, Sean McCaffrey was directed to the dog by a passerby.

"After being flagged down, I followed the small trail of blood to the dog who, having lain there long enough to melt the snow and ice beneath him, was shivering in a pool of frigid water," said McCaffrey. "Rupert did not whine or growl when I approached him. He shivered and wagged his tail and gobbled some food and allowed me to cover him with my coat and hold him to warm him."

 Rupert was transported to the Kingston Regional Pet Hospital. The next morning, Boxing Day, brought a sad turn to the dog's story. It seemed that Rupert's injuries might be too severe to be successfully operable. The afternoon of the 26th saw an improved prognosis for Rupert, with recovery possible although amputation of one leg likely. Rupert's comfort was a priority throughout the evaluation period and he was kept pain-free and at ease.

Rupert's case was then brought to the attention of Dr. Parker and the Ottawa orthopedic surgeon agreed to assess Rupert at Alta Vista. Not only did Dr. Parker think he could help the dog, he believed that both legs could be saved.

So the young dog made the trip from Kingston to Ottawa late on the 29th and spent the morning of the 30th being assessed. Following the exam, Dr. Parker began surgery to pin and plate the broken femur and repair the torn ligaments in the other leg.

"I spoke with Dr. Parker, a veterinarian orthopedic surgeon at Alta Vista Animal Hospital in Ottawa. He has fully assessed Rupert and he feels the prognosis for Rupert is quite good," said Janice Saunders, president of the Kingston Humane Society, in a release dated December 30th. "The current plan is to repair Rupert's fractured left hip. Damage to the cruciate ligament in the right hind leg was also detected and Dr. Parker is repairing this injury during [the] surgery as well." 

The following morning Rupert underwent a final surgery to adjust the plate and pins and then spent the next five days resting and recovering from the successful but arduous surgery.

When Rupert was first brought to the emergency clinic in Kingston he was a stray with no identifiable owner. The Kingston Humane Society sent out a plea to locate Rupert's owner, unsure of the dog's future and seeking a reunion. The community responded immediately offering concern and financial support for the dog.”

.

1 hour ago, Fluffy said:

Question, does distracted driving apply to boating?   In particular, using a cell phone?

First... to clear things up. There is no actual "distracted driving" charge.  Its the fancy catch all name for using phones, eating, reading etc...  anything that removes your focus from the rd. 

Now...for the actual question. No, no such charge.  There is a careless boating offence as well as failing to keep a proper watch.  

18 minutes ago, Renegade X said:

I'm not sure.

Ok, thanks again!  I wish my wife would "crowd the driver" once in a while haha

Lmfao!!! 

44 minutes ago, Renegade X said:

Hey man, another question...lol.  Can my 9 year old daughter go on the back of my Harley? She can touch the foot pegs.  I seem to remember a guy in Barrie or somethin getting charged with child endangerment.   I would actually like to put her in front of me for the 1st ride to be honest, like when I was a kid.

There is no specific age limit as long as she is secure with proper helmet.  The tank could be considered "crowding the driver" by a more...umm...strict copper.   

21 hours ago, XC.Morrison said:

I don’t hate the principle of it and I would assume that goes for most non Trumpers despite what you think you’re hearing.  

For instance, listen to Barrack’s response back in 2008:

The problem now isn’t that Trump has an R next to his name.  It’s that he’s undermined his own credibility  for the past three years of his political career.  It’s hard to have trust but verify if people don’t trust you.  Plus we see through the pomp and circumstance.  Can you?  Legit question.

Wasn't asking about the pomp and circumstance.  Just asking why the criticism because he didn't make efforts, yet criticism when he does make efforts.  Seems confusing and that video is irrelevant to my question.  In the, truthfully it matters not to me either way.  Was just a curiosity.  It does seem @Zambroski explanation on the surface makes sense.  The anti Trump group seem to be a a point where nothing he does will make them happy...  There will always be a "well, yeah..but..."

Ok...  honest/serious question.  I thought anti Trump hated the war of words between Trump and NK.  felt he was just inciting.  Now that there is progress anti Trump hate what he's done.  Saying it's too much?  What am I missing here?  Legit question....

Should've fired him after the incident with that kind of evidence.  Should also be made to repay the salary if he loses his job in the upcoming hearing. 

Just now, stealth bomber said:

Can you get charged with impaired by moving the grass in the ditch in front of your house with a self propelled push mower?

You're using muscular power as part of the process.  You're not actually driving it, so I'd suggest no.  

1 minute ago, 1trailmaker said:

what about navigable items like a canoe or row boat   I as sure you can be charged with impaired 

As they fall under the definition of vessel, yes it is technically possible to be charged with impaired.

19 minutes ago, soupkid said:

Can you be charged with impaired on a bicycle?

No.  To be charged with impaired the vehicle must be driven or propelled by anything OTHER THAN muscular power.  However, should you be drunk riding a bike in public (off private property) you be arrested and fined for public intoxication and depending on the circumstances held until sober.

Just me or that article painful to read??  Hardly a professional piece... 

3 minutes ago, gtserider said:

MTO.MNRF-OPP closed down hwy 69 today.I had a question for Sean but I am so traumatized from the interrogation that i forgot what to ask him. I think it was about old trailer plates that might not be in the system anymore.

Uh oh...  this doesn't sound great...  feel free to PM if you need/want..

1 hour ago, revrnd said:

X2 on the helmet securement. When I pulled into the local gas station to fill up the Ranger on Weds', a friend gave me a heads up that 3 ATV riders had been ticketed in the village (2 separate incidents) for not having their helmets done up properly.

Too bad they got the tickets but the pressure comes from way up the line.  And really, if the strap isn't on securely you might as well not even bother wearing the helmet.  

23 hours ago, revrnd said:

Other than an ATV must be designed to carry 2 passengers rather than an aftermarket seat, are there any specific 'standards' that an ATV must meet to be road legal in Ontario? AFAIK, as long as your paperwork is in order & you're wearing a helmet, you are good to go. Am I missing anything?

Would any officer care about this (or whether the sticker was missing?):

(4) If the off-road vehicle is an all-terrain vehicle manufactured after December 31, 2001, it must display in plain view the overloading warning label that was affixed to the vehicle at the time of its manufacture to show the maximum weight capacity. O. Reg. 135/15, s. 3.

 

Where do I begin?!?!?!  There are many..  reflex reflectors on all four corners facing outward, tire pressures, lights on at all times, brakes  etc....  Then you have UTV/side by side.  Standards for windshields, seat belts, width, power etc...

Here's what I want to see:  Helmet (on AND done up properly), "proper" speed, lights on, passenger compliance.  Paperwork if I stop you.  Do I really care about stickers that get chewed up the first few times through a dense trail.. NOPE!  (unless you convince me to care.. 😉 ).  I can only think of one or two officers that may actually look for those.  Neither work the trails anymore.  

22 hours ago, 02sled said:

I think I'd maybe be in trouble.... The first thing I do whenever I get anything new is to remove those butt ugly orange and black on white warning labels that you find everywhere telling you not to be stupid.

Don't knock stupidity!!  It feeds my family!!!

22 hours ago, revrnd said:

LOL

If you stop me next winter don't look @ the tunnel extension on my sled ☺️

Asking for someone that seems overly paranoid about the whole riding on road thing.