Highmark

4 of the 9 would likely support it.

There is some truth to this post, fresh food is more expensive for a reason....it goes bad and has to be thrown out..... but weight isn't just what you eat its how much and how much exercise you do. You don't have to make a dime to keep your calories intake under 2000 and exercise.

Hunter and Ashley have had more cocaine up their noses than Tony Montana and they are the ones to talk about their fathers ethics.

15:30 Mark. Oops.

Notice how hospitalizations are way down? My county is showing 6 yet the two largest hospitals near me have zero.

.006% of the worlds population. Spanish influenza killed upwards of 5%+ of the worlds population. Malaria kills twice as many people worldwide every year. 1 person in California under the age of 17 has died from Covid and we are shutting schools down.

Condolences to you and yours.

Don't worry if convicted Trump will just pardon them in next term.

Creepy.

A dude in a dress and a wrongly colored American flag. Then the whole love everyone theme when they clearly hate anyone who doesn't agree with them. Hey I like how the song was performed but find the other aspects funny.

You crack me up....you really do.

https://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/news/2020/08/18/will-affluent-residents-leaving-california-still-h.html California’s proposed wealth tax includes an unusual twist — the tax would apply to former residents for 10 years. The pace of departures among California’s wealthy may have reached the point that lawmakers anticipate a rush to the exits if they adopt a first-in-the-nation wealth tax that’s projected to raise $7.5 billion annually from about 30,000 residents. The proposed wealth tax would charge a rate of 0.4% on net worth above $30 million. As proposed, AB 2088 would tax former Californians 90% of their in-state levy in the first year after they leave the state, 80% in the second year until phasing out completely over a decade, the bill’s author, Assemblymember Rob Bonta, D-Oakland, told Fox Business Network anchor Neil Cavuto on Aug. 14. Cavuto captured the likely mood of many wealthy Californians when he told Bonta, “Wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Are you saying that after they move, they’ve left, you are still taxing them? They’re no longer California residents, you can’t legally do that.” Bonta sees things differently. “For 10 years, the wealth was accumulated during their time in California … and that is what we’re proposing in our bill. We believe that we can do that,” Bonta said. A summary of the wealth tax bill points out that the number of California millionaires and billionaires has climbed even after the state adopted the nation’s highest individual income tax rate of 13.3%. (California lawmakers are now considering raising that top rate to 16.8%.) “Sounds like they’d be prisoners of California,” Cavuto said of the plan to tax former California residents. “It hasn’t been just an exodus, it’s been a jailbreak.”

Anything not associated with identity politics. You will cry if Trump wins won't you?

This was for Kumala's introduction.

In 2018 their stock price was over $35.00....now under $10.00. They got bigger fish to fry than sticking their nose in the political correctness game.

Some of their tires sure do wear fast. Couldn't get 30K on the Dmax on them. Toyo's easily go over 50K. Open country R/T's.

Amazon is working on a deal to put distribution centers in old JC Penny and Sears stores in malls all over America. Word is they went to the company that owns most of them and said they would rent them for half what the previous tenants were paying. Don't see how they can turn them down. Amazon will be at $5000 share in 3 years. https://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2020/08/11/why-amazon-wants-to-be-in-malls.html#:~:text=Amazon is reportedly negotiating with,Forrester analyst said this week. Amazon is reportedly negotiating with the nation's largest mall owner to place fulfillment centers in spaces once occupied by thriving anchor-tenant retailers. There's good reason why Amazon would want to be in those spaces, Brendan Witcher, a Forrester analyst said this week.Aug 11, 2020

I read it. You are correct however and "ban" was a too strong of description. I'll admit I was wrong.

I don't agree with Trump's about face on this either. While I think there is some reasonable justification for wanting the lower rates because of the strength of the dollar and pretty much everywhere around the world having lower rates I think we were in too strong of a economic position to justify doing it. I can tell you from real world experience with my customers from Australia that the dollar being so strong was impacting business. https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/101215/how-fed-fund-rate-hikes-affect-us-dollar.asp

The political environment or movement against fossil fuels is completely different than when Obama was elected or re-elected. Obama did try banning fracking on Federal lands but was stopped by the courts. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/23/us/politics/hydraulic-fracturing-interior-department-regulations.html https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/366704-trump-to-repeal-obama-fracking-rule Trump to repeal Obama fracking rule BY TIMOTHY CAMA - 12/28/17 02:38 PM EST