NaturallyAspirated

Ahhh Richard Spencer.... Go Google him. Neal

Perhaps we disagree on how the term racism or racist is used. Do you agree that the standard definition of the term: prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior. is incorrect? Neal

More erroneous bullshit that further makes claims you present dubious. You are being intellectually dishonest. Neal

Neal

No, it's a biased judgement from you based on skin color. So says you. You are not correct however, as you provide example of racist thinking your judgment is dubious, and should not be believed. Neal

You are making an unsubstantiated claim based solely on skin color. Racism. Not prejudice, not perhaps truth, racism. Neal

Phillips hue bulbs, some GE Zwave switches, Nest thermostat, Amazon Alexa, all the kids connected devices run through Disney Circle on our router, have some Zwave outlets to shut off TV and Xbox in the kids rooms. Coming soon will be the outside stove so I can monitor corn/pellet level, supply/return temp, btu, ect. I also have lots of automation connected through my IFTT account, it automates lights when I leave or return home, connects devices to WiFi if they have been turned off when I get home, texts me alarms set on Alexa, ect. Neal

Cuck is an alt right creation, not left. Neal

Wow, he nailed Paul to the wall. Neal

It isn't a truthful statement. To say they can't is racism. Neal

I've already posted the answer. Learn to read for fucks sake. Neal

Are you implying that you can't read worth a fuck? Neal

Sorry for the low blow Joelle... Neal

Jasmean! Neal

This forum needs a wives and girlfriends thread to spice up the joint! Neal

After laughing at JT I did some FE research, and they do offer an inciting theory for the extinction of the dinos... Neal

No, only under a monarchy. Neal

Only in Canada, because it's metric. Neal

Ok, we agree on sentence one, and also on sentence two. However, sentence two can also be rewritten such that fluctuations are present regardless of the height of the lug, yet the lug height can also introduce fluctuations. I do understand the simple, and also the more complex premise going on in the discussion. Under normal real world conditions we would say that the sleds move the same (and I agree with and am happy stating that this is the case we all should go by), in theory they could move slightly different lengths, which is nearly impossible to measure, nor do we care because the results between the two balance out over time if we were to keep constantly measuring. The lug flick is one of the fluctuations that happens during the cycle as you mentioned. It isn't anything more complicated than that. Changing lug height can change those fluctuations (which are changes in the FDR). It's that simple. Neal

That's fine, however there is a problem then when things don't complete a full revolution or cycle then. A theoretical description can (and in this case clearly is) different from the general real world description. Neal

It isn't, and repeating the phrase over and over again isn't going to change it, nor is it a good debate tactic. Lets try this, do you agree that the ratio can change over time, vary within a full cycle, but that variance equals exactly the general calculated rate for exactly one cycle? Neal

Again, then it becomes and absurd question. Can you change an unchangeable. Neal

Incorrect, they sweep in the same direction, you are 100% incorrect in that assessment. Sure, over any time that can be the case, it can also be that when measured at non-peak of the wave times the ratio is not equal. This is the part that you seem to be failing to understand. Neal

I gave you a formula long ago, you choose to ignore it. Not at all, it still stands. Neal

And the all other things being equal was also conceded early in the original discussion. It was agreed that shaft twist, chain stretch, ect. was not part of the "all other things being equal". Otherwise we would end up in a situation where the argument was in essence can an unchangeable FDR be changed, obviously and absurd query. Neal