The Rocket

You are that stupid.

Honest - my 9 year old has better reading comprehension than you do.

Ok - I’ve taken my share of stats classes. Your numbers must include deaths from natural causes (getting old etc). Which is either stupid or disingenuous on your part. I’m hoping it’s a mistake. Im fine if you yanks are ok with your gun culture and don’t desire to try and change it. Just say that and stop the fake outrage at thoughtless gun crime.

Hey Einstein - point to where I said the economy was bad.

Jesus. Focus. Someone that loses their full time job and can’t find full time employment and has to accept part time employment is the very definition of “under employed”. It is also a sign of a weak economy. I never commented on the economy. But everything you are stating about employment is wrong.

Of course it is numbnuts.

People being “under employed” is not a sign of a strong economy. It’s the opposite. After the 2008 financial crisis “under employment” was a big issue in the US. It is not my status. It is a function of my industry. Competing firms are always looking to poach guys from other firms.

Well - your example is wrong. Your example would be considered “under-employment” and not an example of a strong economy.

Min wage in Ontario is now a $32,000 a year job.

I suspect you moved the decimal place one to many to the left. Mix of funds and ETFs?

Interesting. I’ve seen some guys shim skis on the Pro Ride sleds but I’ve not seen abnormal wear. Sadly I don’t have any experience with AXYS based sleds.

The Liberals have started a program of guaranteed income so we are getting closer.

Agreement for what?

Certainly there is that risk. A rookie is more likely to take an account that has the hope to turn into something.

More gold from you. “The markets are never wrong”. The markets are by their nature inefficient and often wrong. If it wasn’t bubbles and busts wouldn’t happen. Inefficient markets create opportunities Anyway you look at the Bomber it’s a company with negative cash flow. Without a $1 billion government bailout and then giving away 50% of its most value asset for FREE it couldn’t afford to produce it’s new plane. If that fits the criteria of your investing philosophy then fill your boots. But thinking it’s a buy because it went up isn’t Warren Buffetesque.

I’m good Stevie. But more time spent in arenas then the entertainment district. Sitting in one as I type. I saw the Puzzler calling out to me numerous times before I rejoined here. I kinda felt sad for him. Awe yes - the Bomber. The company that was so strong that it needed a bailout from the government of a billion $ because it couldn’t afford to actually produce the C series. Then has to GIVE AWAY 50% of the C series to Airbus to make the project viable.

Remember - you don’t pass the test.

Oh Dom you’re killing me. Now - I’d love to stick around and jerk your chain all night but I’ve got an early morning wake up call. So, enjoy stewing in your own juices. I think Pete’s got a long list of issues - but is still a good guy.

Some C&As have crazy aggressive keels.

Of course.

Well, I’d consider a loser someone who goes out of their way to talk about other members. But fill your boots.

All shit breaks if rdden hard enough. But 3 sets of carbides and a set of skis in 2000 miles?

Sure. But what’s funny is you’d apparently be so forgettable. I guess I shouldnt be surprised though. I was told an interesting story where you reached out to a fellow FSer to talk about me.

What? You running on the ground? stock skis have over 4000 miles on them and look like new. 3500 miles on a set of Shaper carbides.