The alt left falls for race baiting once again by fake hijab cutting attack

[Sleepr2]

Just now, revkevsdi said:

Look it up on snopes or politifact. 

So just bullshit, no surprise,

funny how war protesters seemed to disappear when Obambi took over,  

[Sleepr2]

3 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Looking forward to the next Democrat President. What will the right wing bitch about? 

No one will match his spending on family security, Golfing or vacations. They sure as fuck aren’t going to match the lies. When they call out fox and Beitbart as fake news and toss them out of the whitehouse it will be hilarious. 

[revkevsdi]

7 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

So all of those liberals were fooled by the dumbest president ever? 

 

Remember the elecorate were the biggest cheerleaders. Any vote against the war was seen as treason. Fox had you convinced Alqeda was in Iraq and half their viewers thought they helped with 9/11.  And the Dumbest president until your semi-literate asshole trump showed up. 

[Rod]

9 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Trump only claimed to be against the war after if was a shit show. 

At the time Hillary voted for it, trump was for it.

 

 

 

Liar liar pants on fire 

[revkevsdi]

Just now, Sleepr2 said:

Nice bullshit chart. I bet you think it’s and accurate portrayal 

[Sleepr2]

4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Remember the elecorate were the biggest cheerleaders. Any vote against the war was seen as treason. Fox had you convinced Alqeda was in Iraq and half their viewers thought they helped with 9/11.  And the Dumbest president until your semi-literate asshole trump showed up. 

So, all those liberals were fooled by the dumbest president ever and voted against the the best interests of the country because of Fox ?

 

[Sleepr2]

5 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Nice bullshit chart. I bet you think it’s and accurate portrayal 

This one is.

[revkevsdi]

2 hours ago, Sleepr2 said:

This one is.

Holy shit you dumbfuck. That chart is for a completely different topic.  The beauty is you double owned your dumbass self. Look at the chart. Look how much sharper it was rising before he took power. 

Think real hard about how stupid you look right now. 

[revkevsdi]

2 hours ago, Sleepr2 said:

So just bullshit, no surprise,

funny how war protesters seemed to disappear when Obambi took over,  

https://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/

 

how about fact check?  

But if that isn’t good enough how about you provide proof of Donny being against the war before it started.  He claims he was after the fact. Where’s the proof?

Edited January 19, 2018 by revkevsdi

[revkevsdi]

2 hours ago, Rod Johnson said:

Liar liar pants on fire 

If Liars pants actually caught fire Trump would be one crispy critter. 

[Sleepr2]

3 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

https://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/

 

how about fact check?  

But if that isn’t good enough how about you provide proof of Donny being against the war before it started.  He claims he was after the fact. Where’s the proof?

I’m not the one making claims , prove you own bullshit,

[Sleepr2]

1 minute ago, revkevsdi said:

If Liars pants actually caught fire Trump would be one crispy critter. 

And many of your heros would be a hit at a bonfire party 

[Angry ginger]

2 hours ago, revkevsdi said:

So what, they were going on the intel that Bush was selling.  

As for Sheehan, having your son die for a lie might turn a lot of Mothers into whack jobs. 

I know he knew what he was getting into.  But the flip side of being willing to lay down your life for your country is that the commander in chief puts some value on that life. 

you mean the intel that for the most part was gathered during the clinton years.  

[revkevsdi]

2 minutes ago, Sleepr2 said:

I’m not the one making claims , prove you own bullshit,

I provided 3 good sources.  You don’t trust them so it’s on you to prove otherwise. 

[revkevsdi]

1 minute ago, Angry ginger said:

you mean the intel that for the most part was gathered during the clinton years.  

That makes it worse.  It shows Clinton didn’t fall for it and Republicans did. 

Imagine how much better the US would have been if fuckers in Florida hadn’t fucked up. 

Your air and water would be cleaner, you would be leading the world in clean technology. He probably would have put tariffs on products from countries who polluted more than the US. What did those two wars cost? 10 trillion plus future costs of all the wounded. 

 

[Sleepr2]

29 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

That makes it worse.  It shows Clinton didn’t fall for it and Republicans did. 

Imagine how much better the US would have been if fuckers in Florida hadn’t fucked up. 

Your air and water would be cleaner, you would be leading the world in clean technology. He probably would have put tariffs on products from countries who polluted more than the US. What did those two wars cost? 10 trillion plus future costs of all the wounded. 

 

 

 

 

“One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
    President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

 

“If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
    President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

“Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
    Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

“He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
    Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”
    Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John
Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

“Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
    Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

“Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
   
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

“There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
    Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others,
Dec, 5, 2001.

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.”
    Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

“We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

“Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
    Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
    Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”
    Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
    Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

“He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do.”
    Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program.
He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
    Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction. “[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real …
    Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.

[revkevsdi]

I like all of the ones from 1998. Because in December of 1998 Clinton bombed the stupid Fucker. That accounts for the 4 year gap. 

Maybe Gore would have taken the less costly route and bombed him again.  

But then again all those Republicans wouldn’t have been able to syphon off billions  with a four day bombing campaign. 

 

[Sleepr2]

5 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

I like all of the ones from 1998. Because in December of 1998 Clinton bombed the stupid Fucker. That accounts for the 4 year gap. 

Maybe Gore would have taken the less costly route and bombed him again.  

But then again all those Republicans wouldn’t have been able to syphon off billions  with a four day bombing campaign.