Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 11, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2017 1 minute ago, f7ben said: no , it hasnt been investigated....its been swept under the rug Just like the repudiation of your Assange bullshit related to Rich Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 3 minutes ago, SnowRider said: Just like the repudiation of your Assange bullshit related to Rich You are just that dumb.....you have no clue how powerful wikileaks is or how it works. You are a fucking moron. Assange is a hero and those with brains know why he posted the reward for info on Rich ...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 (edited) ice and sr you'd have better luck corresponding with this, than ben. Edited July 11, 2017 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 1 minute ago, f7ben said: You are just that dumb.....you have no clue how powerful wikileaks is or how it works. You are a fucking moron. Assange is a hero and those with brains know why he posted the reward for info on Rich ...... Strange how wikileaks never seems to publish anything negative about the Republicans or Russia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f7ben Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said: Strange how wikileaks never seems to publish anything negative about the Republicans or Russia The panama papers were extremely damaging to many russian oligarchs in Putins sphere.....do a little research you inbred little girl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member SnowRider Posted July 11, 2017 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted July 11, 2017 17 hours ago, SnowRider said: I watched the Assange interview. Assange was asked why the bombshells he dishonestly promised didn't materialize. Assange's phony excuse was his sources were afraid. Then Assange mentioned Rich as an example of why his leakers are scared. Assange didn't say that Rich was his source. Its dishonest to claim he did. Wikileaks sent out a press release afterwards that denied Assange was in any way trying to imply that Rich was his source. https://www.discussionist.com/10151339823 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: ice and sr you'd have better luck corresponding with this, than ben. The link fucks up .7 Momo's conspiracy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 ask ben to show you his proof from assange that seth was murdered by the DNC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 ben's "smoking gun"... On 6/28/2017 at 10:03 AM, f7ben said: Well , I'd say considering the entire establishment is selling out trying to bury it its going well. Assange said its Rich and he's never lied. Everyone else saying its not Rich with all their might has lied every single fucking time they spoke. You go ahead and continue to be a blind retarded sheep On 6/28/2017 at 10:09 AM, Snoslinger said: link to assange saying it was rich, please.... On 6/28/2017 at 10:12 AM, f7ben said: "We have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States, and that our sources face serious risks. That's why they come to us so we can protect their anonymity," Assange said. He made clear that Rich's case had come to "no conclusion" but that Rich's death was an example of the dangers that could befall whistleblowers – "our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that." WikiLeaks later offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich's killer, as described by reporter Patrick Madden of NPR member station WAMUin Washington. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICEMAN! Posted July 11, 2017 Share Posted July 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, f7ben said: The panama papers were extremely damaging to many russian oligarchs in Putins sphere.....do a little research you inbred little girl Extremely damaging how? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.