Zambroski

Actually. They really aren't as easy to get as some may want most to believe. But after a criminal background check and waiting period, what more can be done if there is no suspicious reason to deny. Although, clearly there was a reason here. If the the Fucking FBI had to question you about terrorists ties, well.....WTF?

I have 3 AR's. One is mine. The other two I bought Clinton pre-ban for $550 each. Some nice little things on the older ones that the newer ones don't have like mil-spec bolts and carriers, H-bar barrels, and mil spec receivers and trigger mechanisms. Those two are still in the original case, never fired, just maintained twice a year. Last I checked they were worth about $2800 each. Too funny. Let's see how much the Dems get the prices up...may be time to SELL, SELL, SELL!!!!! i don't even know how much the military 30 round mags are worth...hell, got about a hundred of those. C'mon Dems!!!!!! I may be in for a decent little payday. Retards.

Ok...but what are the percentages and order of the blame or fault. Clearly they cannot all be equal. And since they are not, we need to try and solve the one that has the largest percentage of blame. It's not hard to do though...start taking away each component and ask if it would have still happened. Here's another: a raging alcoholic gets mad, jumps in his corvette, picks up a 5th at the liquor store then plows into a crowd at the mall a 100mph. So do we close the liquor stores? Or go after their suppliers? Shut down GM? Or go after the company that stamped out the gas pedal? Maybe we should sue the property management company of the mall for putting those crowds on the sidewalks. This is so incredibly stupid I forgot where I was going with it and just don't care because I know where to place blame. But being able to think like this tells me I may be eligible for a liberal trainee card.

One clown calling someone else a clown while supporting her clown. Sounds pretty clownish to me. Liberal idiot hypocrisy....the more the funnier.

"Snowrider", being rejected again.....

It's one of the finest designed small arms weapons ever made. I've fired many and carried many and had a choice to carry what I wanted. Always went back to an AR "shorty". Even an idiot boy raping Muslim knows it's a solid piece..and he's a a clown anyway because he chose a Glock and an AR to do a job that two good shotguns could have done better. But he's at least smart enough to read Americans like the retards we are...we won't blame the shooter, we'll blame that nasty AR...and continue to help his Muslim brothers accomplish their mission.

Gun maker stocks went through the roof this morning! I'm purchasing stock in ammo suppliers tomorrow. Democratic political leaders will be meeting with Islamic leaders and "glad handing" to show there are no hard feelings. Those liberals...they got this all figured out, they just don't know it!

Seriously? No. There wouldn't be any wounded and there'd be triple the deaths. Hell, in that time, he could have made his own ammo as he went. Not sure what he did for 3 hours? Maybe stopped for a "blow" and a handful of hairy ass.

What? It was black right? That's military issue!! Idiots!

Well, I think there are better and more preferred devices for home defense. But look at the quote carefully. What he "believes" doesn't matter and it sounded nice. Go back to my history lesson post: When the Constitution was drawn up and the 2nd's "Right to Keep and Bear Arms" was being "penned", it was not so citizens could hunt and put food on their tables. It was to make it possible to take up arms and defend ourselves against the tyranny of an organized government entity trying to take away rights of the citizens. Most politicians are mostly very aware of this fact....and agree. Republicans for sure. The Dems are the ones how somehow have turned this into a "why do you need THAT for home defense or hunting?" And the right side retards have FALLEN for it by trying to answer that question when there really isn't a reasonable answer that can explain it. AGAIN: When the Constitution was drawn up and the 2nd's "Right to Keep and Bear Arms" was being "penned", it was not so citizens could hunt and put food on their tables. It was to make it possible to take up arms and defend ourselves against the tyranny of an organized government entity trying to take away rights of the citizens. This, or some simile, should become the standard answer. And the debate against it can not be argued successfully.

I'm not going to break down your liberal crap taken out of context so you dweebs can call it "facts". And I'm not sure if you notice...never mind, you don't notice. But your ass gets handed to you on almost every thread...over and over and over and over. We are all laughing at you here...you are.the epitome and poster boy of liberal idiocy. And WOW! Would I ever love to meet you in person! We could really get some things "discussed". Never know, it's a small world...let's not jinx it.

Horseshit liberal babel. I'd ask you to do better but you cannot. The best thing you can do to help your cause is just to be silent. If that means it takes a bullet in your head, well, take one for your own team. You may need help though, hitting that little brain would prove to be quite a shot of luck without proper skills.

I usually don't follow gun law advocates or any of that shit relating. I don't care much because little will ever be done that amounts to anything. America possesses firearms in MASS quantities because of their ingrained distrust for their government. And here's a quick history lesson. When the Constitution was drawn up and the 2nd's "Right to Keep and Bear Arms" was being "penned", it was not so citizens could hunt and put food on their tables. It was to make it possible to take up arms and defend ourselves against the tyranny of an organized government entity trying to take away rights of the citizens. YEP! That's why! That's also why any gun is sold and is legal to own. Weather or not it is used for hunting is irrelevant. Not that I agree. Lots of fat ass wanna be Special Forces guys running through the woods with assault weapons...personally, I could shoot them on site and be good with it...but I digress.... There has been all kinds of little laws past by liberals in their states that you don't hear about because the public will not comply and it is embarrassing for the lawmakers. There was a state in NE (I think). That made registering firearms a law. People had 90 days (I believe) to comply and give their name, gun model, serial #'s, etc.... or risk forfeiture of their guns. Guess how many did it? Yep....apparently their were almost no gun owners in the entire state. Now, what does this mean? Pretty simple..... You want them...come and take them! And good luck with all that.

I'd have to go back and look but aren't most of these shootings done by registered Democrats? I'm pretty sure I read an amazing article about that somewhere. Hmmmm And Snowrider...what a bunch of hypocritical liberal bullshit you are spewing...INCREDULOUS!!!! You and people like you are why gun laws aren't getting passed. You are nothing but a left wing nut job. And a fucking pussy. Go away. Find somewhere else to sling that shit. Maybe a gay bar in Orlando....two days ago. You can be the one standing up defending Islam while all of it was taking place.

What? Sounds like a perfectly harmless religion to me. Although I didn't see any "J/K (Just Kidding)" remarks after each passage. So.... Wait, surely these can be interpreted in a more civil form. Right?

Jesus Fucking Christ! (Pun intended) First off, the author that you "cut and pasted" again because you aren't intelligent enough to think for yourself or comprehend anything you try to read is a pretty liberal constituent known for his Anti-republican, anti-establishment rants in rags. So, there's that discredit. And here's the next: did you read all this before you thought you'd stick it here for your hopeful "win"? I think not, or at least hope not. But I don't care. What does this have to do with the argument other than your pathetic defense of this crime? Nothing. Would this have happened without this mans belief in Islam? Nope. And be careful who the fuck you are calling a "pussy". Because I'm your God damn huckleberry all day long you fucking idiot.

When left-tards were introduced to "boom sticks".

I think we can all agree there are some "good ones". But the religion as a whole is mostly deciphered as most of us would call violent. Christianity would have been too but the "good book" has been revised so many times, it's hardly what it originally was...which was as frightening as the Qur'an. The reason "Christian crimes" aren't labeled the same as Islamic is we are all used to that form of insanity...Islam is a "new to us" violent religion we are not accustomed to and there are a lot more Islamic "whack-jobs" than Christian ones. Scary for sure! But here is the big difference between the "new" Bible and the religious teachings of the Qua'ran; violence as a means to spread Christianity is denounced. The Qur'an has remained the same since it was written and pretty much advocates violence and deception by any means necessary to please "Allah". And it's the "deception" part that throws the left-tards off balance. Again, remember, I think all religions are the bane of human existence. Some are REALLY damaging though when there is no room at all for "interpretation". The Qur'an is VERY SPECIFIC as to what Allah expects. Followers of true Islam DO NOT get a choice of a level of crazy like Christians do.

Ah, they forgot to change their ammo out. They were probably still loaded with negro tracers.

Nobody wanted to be accused of a hate crime on a Muslim.

Some people don't have access to news or the internet apparently. Only this forum board. It's easier to just call people liars because it's a conspiracy against their beliefs. Again...just plain amazing brain activity here. It's not just a matter of wires being crossed...it's a matter of completely missing an electrical charge.

Here's a question: how many wonder how many Muslims are celebrating this attack vs. how many are mourning?

How has this become an attack on Christians? The point you libs are trying to make is not very correlating in this event. But we're all used to the spin and deflect from you guys. And, FWIW I think all religious people are clinically insane. But I think the same of lefty-liberals. Now, without calling names or labeling anybody, I wonder what idealism he was following when he decided to carry this out. Well, I don't really wonder.

I like you again. But don't tell anybody.