jtssrx

The North Star can seen as far south as the Tropic of Capricorn

If you can see the stars that you saw on one side of the sun which would be behind you why don't you still see the sun light?

Did any of you watch even ten minutes of the video?

If you are on one side of the sun looking out into space at night how would it be possible to see any of the same stars when you rotated to the other side of the sun 6 months later? You are facing the opposite way from where you were facing 6 months prior and looking out into another area of space. The stars you were looking at should be behind you now

Im trolling. I challenge any of you to disprove any of the proofs Eric Dubey has compiled. I notice not one of you has talked about how it's possible to see the same stars year round on a globe that rotates 360 degrees around the sun. Again I'm not here to fight and call names. I wish it was a spinning ball. I wish the sun was 93 million miles away. From what I've researched it's not. We are the center of the universe and the sun, moon, and stars rotate around us

First and foremost I'm not here to call anyone stupid for what they believe. About two years ago I was watching a video and saw something about flat earth and like all of you I laughed. After laughing I watched the video and it made me scratch my head. I was then on a quest to prove the theory wrong. In two years I've been unable to debunk the proofs put out. Most of you are unaware but it want until NASA went to the moon that we stopped calling heliocentricity a theory or a model. In the early 1900's flat earth was still taught in school. The heliocentric model came from Copernicus about 500 years ago. I could tupe type paragraph after paragraph on the topic but I'll post this video. Most of you don't watch it or will watch some but not all. If you just want to call me names to make yourself feel better that's cool. But that doesn't prove the earth is round. I want ant to point on one of the major issues I have with the globe model. According to the model we rotate around the sun. This causes the seasons. Ask yourself how is it possible to see any of the same stars on one side of the sun and then 6 months later when we've traveled to the other side of the sun? If we travel from one side to the other we should be facing 180 degrees away from where visible space at night is. If you can't visualize this Take a globe and place a ball on one side of it rotate the globe from one side to the other side to understand what I'm talking about

Yes

No you're an idiot. No one else just you

I don't care I have nothing to hide. side note I don't believe the moon is a hologram. I shared some videos from a guy that studies the moon. He's said he's not sure what the moon is. I do do believe the earth is flat. I would explain why but most people aren't open minded enough to except the concept Plus I don't care if you believe it's flat I believe what I do based on the research I've done. anyone who thinks 911 was done by 19 terrorists is an idiot. Again I don't care what anyone believes. Ive never tried to force any of you to believe anything I believe. I'm cool with you believe what ever you wish

Ha ha ha ha ha GPS is ground based. Talking about satellites doesn't disprove what I said. Also so I could careless what you think. You brought up the flat earth thing so I responded. Also Im not ashamed to admit i don't believe we living a a spinning globe that spins 1100 mph at the equator while flying around the sun at 66600 mph and the reason we can't feel it is because of gravity. Youre the one that believes gravity holds the oceans and everything else to the surface of a spinning ball

MSNBC reporter under fire for claiming Obama's Paris climate change agreement is designed to STOP storms like Matthew By Dailymail.com Reporter 10:09 EST 06 Oct 2016, updated 16:49 EST 06 Oct 2016 MSNBC reporter Ron Allen said the Paris climate change agreement is 'designed to stop' storms like Hurricane Matthew While more frequent and stronger storms have been connected to global warming, it's unclear whether human action can stop them The comments sent right-wingers into a frenzy on Twitter 'Another liberal "journalist" completely devoid of reality,' one wrote An MSNBC reporter was bashed online on Wednesday, when he claimed on air that the new Paris climate change agreement would stop storms like Hurricane Matthew. Ron Allen was reporting from the White House, where President Obama spoke to the media about the agreement being ratified by the required number of nations. When President Obama wrapped up his speech, Allen started speaking and tied the agreement to the current hurricane barreling towards Florida. Scroll down for video MSNBC reporter Ron Allen said the Paris climate change deal was 'designed' to stop storms like Hurricane Matthew 'It’s very interesting that this is happening on a day when there’s a hurricane bearing down on the United States and in the Caribbean because these severe storms, beach erosions, intense weather episodes that we’ve had is perhaps the most practical sample of what the president was talking about as the threat that the planet faces,' Allen said. He went on to say that the agreement, which encourages nations to reduce their carbon emissions, 'is designed to stop' storms like Hurricane Matthew. While the frequency and strength of hurricanes has been linked to global warming, scientists have not suggested that weather can be controlled by human action. The comment sent Twitter users into a frenzy, ridiculing Allen for making the assumption that humans could change weather Related Articles 'This storm will kill you': Tailbacks leave thousands in gridlock across the East Coast as two million are told to flee deadly hurricane Matthew as it kills 69 and prepares to hit the US TODAY Devastation: Aerial footage shows Haiti villages leveled by Hurricane Matthew as death toll climbs to 69 across the Caribbean Haiti after the hurricane: At least 69 people killed in the Caribbean as thousands of homes are destroyed by Matthew Hurricane Matthew sparks travel chaos: More than 2,500 flights are cancelled, train service are suspended and streets are gridlocked as East Coast braces for 'direct hit' And many right wingers who oppose the climate change agreement found Allen's assumption that the deal would stop hurricanes ridiculous. 'NBC's Ron Allen says Obama's climate change scam is designed to stop hurricanes? Another liberal "journalist" completely devoid of reality,' Twitter account @SetUSAFree wrote. 'Gotta love groupie journalists who praise a Con-Mander-in-Chief for taking control of the planet's weather system #wakeup,' Twitter user @marbisme wrote. Haiti after the hurricane: At least 69 people killed in the Caribbean as thousands of homes are destroyed by Matthew

GPS? Are you saying GPS proves the heliocentric model? If if so your an idiot. We've had GPS type technology since the 1940's. GPS is ground based http://youtu.be/RNHnU48E-MI

The CIA bumped poppy production up when we invaded Afghanistan. Our government is killing its own citizens for profit.

What kind of dyno does he use? Also dynotech is the bench mark for all sleds because he synods everything. So the old cat turbo motor in stock form dynoed at 180 I believe. So this motor if it's not really 205 it dynoed at 25 hp more. Also I wouldn't but it past Yamaha to have detuned the sidewinder. I'll be curious to see how a production sidewinder shows at dynotech you're the definition of an idiot. I challenge you to prove the heliocentric model. You probably dont even know what I mean

According to Vince and the other idiots government is great. It created everything

I'm not talking about the interstates . I'm talking about infrastructure in the city like rail roads and roads that service the plants. Yes cars are still built there but not at the rate they were. Oh oh and nothing you've said changes the economy bring garbage. You really are a dumb fuck. So blinded by your love for Obama

I'm blocking you now to. I don't need to see you or snowriders drivel anymore.

The sled made 205 bone fucking stock. Anyone who disputes this is a fucking idiot.

REVEALED: Stunning Order Bill Clinton Gave At Airport When Lynch’s Plane Came In Advertisement - story continues below Many of us still get a bit peeved when we recall the “chance meeting” that took place in late June between former President Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the hot tarmac of the Phoenix airport. While many have presumed that the topic of discussion between the two on Lynch’s plane centered on the FBI’s investigation into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server for official government business, that presumption has been staunchly and repeatedly denied by the participants and their cohorts in the liberal media. But according to an excerpt of a new book by investigative author Ed Klein published in The New York Post, their conversation was indeed centered on the FBI’s investigation, and the meeting was most certainly not by chance. Advertisement - story continues below “Don’t take off!” Clinton reportedly shouted to his pilot after receiving word that Lynch’s plane was due to land at the same airport he was about to take off from. One of Clinton’s trusted legal advisers relayed to Klein how Clinton had called him up, explained the situation, then said, “I want to bushwhack Loretta. I’m going to board her plane. What do you think?” The adviser replied, “There’s no downside for you, but she’s going to take a pounding if she’s crazy enough to let you on her plane.” Advertisement - story continues below “He knew it would be a huge embarrassment to Loretta when people found out that she had talked to the husband of a woman — the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party — who was under criminal investigation by the FBI,” Klein was told by the adviser. “But he didn’t give a damn. He wanted to intimidate Loretta and discredit (FBI Director) Comey’s investigation of Hillary’s emails.” The adviser was not on the plane for that meeting, but recalled discussing the conversation with Clinton afterwards, noting that Lynch had reportedly been nervous but fully understood the “message that Hillary had a power base that included ‘the full weight of the Clinton machine, the Democratic Party, and the White House.'” “Bill said he could tell that Loretta knew from the get-go that she’d made a huge mistake,” recalled the adviser. “She was literally trembling, shaking with nervousness. Her husband tried to comfort her; he kept patting her hand and rubbing her back.” After about 30 minutes, Clinton left, satisfied with the promise from Lynch that his wife would not face an indictment or prosecution for her “extreme carelessness” in mishandling classified materials on her private server. Advertisement - story continues below The rest is history, as they say, for just a week later FBI Director James Comey described and criticized Hillary Clinton’s crimes but refused to recommend charges against her. Of course the information in Klein’s book has yet to be verified and corroborated, but judging by many of the known facts surrounding that meeting on the tarmac, what he has described seems entirely plausible. Sadly, as things stand right now, Hillary Clinton will not be prosecuted for her crimes, nor will Bill for what certainly appears to be his interference in a federal investigation. H/T U.K. Daily Mail Please share this on Facebook and Twitter to help spread this purported inside account of what really transpired during that meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch on the Phoenix airport tarmac.

In our Wi-Fi world, the internet still depends on undersea cables Nicole Starosielski Assistant Professor of Media, Culture and Communication, New York University Cables crisscross the oceans carrying your internet info.Telegeography Submarine Cable Map Recently a New York Times article on Russian submarine activity near undersea communications cables dredged up Cold War politics and generated widespread recognition of the submerged systems we all depend upon. Not many people realize that undersea cables transport nearly 100% of transoceanic data traffic. These lines are laid on the very bottom of the ocean floor. They’re about as thick as a garden hose and carry the world’s internet, phone calls and even TV transmissions between continents at the speed of light. A single cable can carry tens of terabits of information per second. While researching my book The Undersea Network, I realized that the cables we all rely on to send everything from email to banking information across the seas remain largely unregulated and undefended. Although they are laid by only a few companies (including the American company SubCom and the French company Alcatel-Lucent) and often funneled along narrow paths, the ocean’s vastness has often provided them protection. 2015 map of 278 in-service and 21 planned undersea cables. Telegeography Far from wireless The fact that we route internet traffic through the ocean – amidst deep sea creatures and hydrothermal vents – runs counter to most people’s imaginings of the internet. Didn’t we develop satellites and Wi-Fi to transmit signals through the air? Haven’t we moved to the cloud? Undersea cable systems sound like a thing of the past. The reality is that the cloud is actually under the ocean. Even though they might seem behind the times, fiber-optic cables are actually state-of-the-art global communications technologies. Since they use light to encode information and remain unfettered by weather, cables carry data faster and cheaper than satellites. They crisscross the continents too – a message from New York to California also travels by fiber-optic cable. These systems are not going to be replaced by aerial communications anytime soon. A tangled cable caught by fishermen in New Zealand. A vulnerable system? The biggest problem with cable systems is not technological – it’s human. Because they run underground, underwater and between telephone poles, cable systems populate the same spaces we do. As a result, we accidentally break them all the time. Local construction projects dig up terrestrial lines. Boaters drop anchors on cables. And submarines can pinpoint systems under the sea. Most of the recent media coverage has been dominated by the question of vulnerability. Are global communications networks really at risk of disruption? What would happen if these cables were cut? Do we need to worry about the threat of sabotage from Russian subs or terrorist agents? The answer to this is not black and white. Any individual cable is always at risk, but likely far more so from boaters and fishermen than any saboteur. Over history, the single largest cause of disruption has been people unintentionally dropping anchors and nets. The International Cable Protection Committee has been working for years to prevent such breaks. An undersea cable lands in Fiji. Nicole Starosielski, CC BY-ND As a result, cables today are covered in steel armor and buried beneath the seafloor at their shore-ends, where the human threat is most concentrated. This provides some level of protection. In the deep sea, the ocean’s inaccessibility largely safeguards cables – they need only to be covered with a thin polyethelene sheath. It’s not that it’s much more difficult to sever cables in the deep ocean, it’s just that the primary forms of interference are less likely to happen. The sea is so big and the cables are so narrow, the probability isn’t that high that you’d run across one. Sabotage has actually been rare in the history of undersea cables. There are certainly occurrences (though none recently), but these are disproportionately publicized. The World War I German raid of the Fanning Island cable station in the Pacific Ocean gets a lot of attention. And there was speculation about sabotage in the cable disruptions outside Alexandria, Egypt in 2008, which cut 70% of the country’s internet, affecting millions. Yet we hear little about the regular faults that occur, on average, about 200 times each year. Redundancy provides some protection The fact is it’s incredibly difficult to monitor these lines. Cable companies have been trying to do so for more than a century, since the first telegraph lines were laid in the 1800s. But the ocean is too vast and the lines simply too long. It would be impossible to stop every vessel that came anywhere near critical communications cables. We’d need to create extremely long, “no-go” zones across the ocean, which itself would profoundly disrupt the economy. Fewer than 300 cable systems transport almost all transoceanic traffic around the world. And these often run through narrow pressure points where small disruptions can have massive impacts. Since each cable can carry an extraordinary amount of information, it’s not uncommon for an entire country to rely on only a handful of systems. In many places, it would take only a few cable cuts to take out large swathes of the internet. If the right cables were disrupted at the right time, it could disrupt global internet traffic for weeks or even months. The thing that protects global information traffic is the fact that there’s some redundancy built into the system. Since there is more cable capacity than there is traffic, when there is a break, information is automatically rerouted along other cables. Because there are many systems linking to the United States, and a lot of internet infrastructure is located here, a single cable outage is unlikely to cause any noticeable effect for Americans. Surfacing.in is an interactive platform developed by Erik Loyer and the author that lets users navigate the transpacific cable network. CC BY-ND Any single cable line has been and will continue to be susceptible to disruption. And the only way around this is to build a more diverse system. But as things are, even though individual companies each look out for their own network, there is no economic incentive or supervisory body to ensure the global system as a whole is resilient. If there’s a vulnerability to worry about, this is it.

Here in Michigan GM ford and Chrysler basically built the entire infrastructure. City's like flint and lansing how have lost GM have struggled to maintain roads because GM is there to build anything anymore. Youre premise that government does it is stupid. Facilitating the construction with other people's money isn't doing anything at all

Billy Howard took a thundercat to dynotech. First to runs are bone stock with two different types of fuel the second two are with a speed works muffler and two different types of fuel

So you agree with Obama "you didn't build that" goverment can't build anything with the the help of the tax payer. The biggest payer of taxes are business. The idea the government creates the infrastructure for business to exist is hilarious and it also flys in the face of the constitution. Please go read the 17 enumerated powers and show me where it says build roads for business

When you lie about people you get sued. I notice no one has sued the author of Clinton Cash

Ya the cop is an asshole.but painting all cops as bad because there a some bad ones is just wrong