Snoslinger

i'm looking at some of the actual transcripts from the report, and not on DU. SBYL. but it's nothing new really.

it's like alot of you are modern day OJ fans, thinking OJ was really innocent.

it's a damn shame the report does not completely exonerate trump on all things russia. not even close to it

so what's the much less damaging truth, snakey? and why are you not working again, in this booming economy? or maybe you're working from home on your second job - trying to set up some russian adoptions...

well search for it ya simpleton. hell you probably already did.

i understand the entire thing not being released to the public. comgress, or at least some members of congress, need to see the entire thing. you agree or not? why you not be for that, and want to solely rely on a trump croney? oh wait....

nope, i have seen this nowhere.

no, they confirm yours.

the doj is letting it be known congress will be seeing less redacted stuff in the report, including information about stone's upcoming trial. magically, important information will be leaked to the press, resulting in a mistrial for stone, and he'll get off. why else would congress be alloweed to see that information, and not other stuff?

yet you and many others, and trump himself, said you'd be fine with the full report you clowns get caught in lies every day, just like your master.

yet you know who zoso is, for not being in here much?

trump, nor you most likely, are not talking the same things. it was a wall, a big tall wall with beautiful doors, a wall mexico was going to pay for. he couldn't get that, and has now settled with more common sense fence, one that's been in use. only now, you're all chanting "build a fence, and we will pay for it. we never said a wall". fucking simpleton.

but by all means, ejaculate all over yourselves, again

um, the entire, unredacted report to go to congress. whoever is expecting some major damage to come out today, after seeing wtf has happened since trump put his crony barr in charge, is a little nuts.

you're all so scared to answer a simple question. or is really not so simple? look at each statement and tell me the difference.

stfu you coward pussy. i'm an EE (from a more difficult, US university ) and if i had said the same things as AC you and others would be crying about it for years.

ttt, especially for dopo

hey dumb fuck, he said "no collusion" before. there was not enough evidence to meet the legal definition of collusion. no one is disputing that. why do you need to keep being told the same thing over and over and over?

another dipshit who's now reverted to "barrier" instead of "wall". nobody ever said "no barrier" ya dumb fuck.

You should try answering the question. Or can’t you see the differences?

Yep.

Another one of many cases where I can only imagine the outrage from the right if Obama acted in these manners. And for once, it’d be valid. But now, dead silence. They’re so fucking fucked up.

I like how creepr the pussy and snakey think we are best buds now, because you see the assanine things trump does, and point out the idiocy of it, and the hypocrisy of them with it

So I did a little research on church vandalism in France, and came across this. Look at the date. It’s very possible the notre dame incident was indeed a terrorist attack. I hope that isn’t the case but the possibility of it is not that far fetched. https://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/world/2016/september/race-against-the-clock-7-radical-islamists-caught-in-notre-dame-bomb-plot