SnowRider

Say it ain't so... . JT is a meathead who believes any right wing conspiracy that's in the interwebs....like this one and Michelle Obama is a man and the girls were delivered by a stork......and thats just the last week. His conspiracy list is long and costumes to be unproven.....But he keeps on believing.... . He makes Doe Dumber look smart.

IDGAF....all I know is you're a fucking joke at what ever your internet title is

You need to observe and learn before you desperately spout off in an attempt to fit in . FYI - this thread will continue to be discussed until someone in here proves to me trickled on economics works and/or the R's change their economic philosophy. If you don't like it - STFU and don't read the thread. Is that clear dipshit?

And being a Mod is considered..... Gotta be a complete fuck up to be a Mod on a snowmobile forum and then complain when someone posts about the very same site. Takes a special kind of stupid eh HSR

Doe Dumber Kansas tax revenue has come up short once again. The Department of Revenue announced Tuesday that total state revenues for February were $56.7 million under projections lowered just four months ago to adjust for worrisome economic trends. Individual income tax receipts were $27 million short of projections. Sales tax revenue was $12.3 million short. Revenue Secretary Nick Jordan said a downturn in the oil and gas industry was dragging down the economies of several Midwestern states including Kansas. Democratic legislative leaders said the income tax cuts Gov. Sam Brownback pushed through the Republican-controlled Legislature in 2012 remain at the root of the state’s revenue and budget problems. As he has in response to previous shortfalls, Brownback insisted his tax cuts were not to blame. “This is an economic problem, not a tax policy problem,” he said in a statement issued minutes after the revenue numbers were announced. “These numbers reflect a declining national and regional economy.” Brownback said he will oppose any effort to adjust the tax cuts despite calls from some influential Republicans to restore taxes on the pass-through incomes of more than 300,000 business owners. The governor said he would instead focus on “managing spending.” To that end, he ordered an immediate 3 percent cut in the budgets of the state’s Board of Regents universities, requiring them to reduce their approved budgets by $17 million with only four months remaining in the fiscal year. In an opinion piece published recently by several Kansas newspapers and broadcast Tuesday on Kansas Public Radio, former Kansas Budget Director Duane Goossen said even though Brownback sold the tax cuts as a way to stimulate the state economy, his real goal may have been “squeezing down” state government. “If you truly bought into the argument that giant tax cuts would lead to prosperity without hurting schools and highways, you’ve been had,” Goossen wrote. “Meanwhile, those wanting Kansas to spend less regardless of the consequences have met success.” Goossen, a former Republican legislator, served as budget director for 12 years under governors of both political parties, starting with Republican Gov. Bill Graves. The lower-than-expected revenue numbers will present an immediate challenge to lawmakers returning Wednesday to the Statehouse after a brief mid-session break. Prior to the break lawmakers approved a series of spending reductions and one-time fund transfers to erase a projected $200 million shortfall in the fiscal year 2017 budget, which takes effect July 1. But those measures won’t be enough to cover the February revenue shortfalls or any that may occur in subsequent months this fiscal year. The preliminary budget plan also doesn’t include any of the additional money that likely will be needed to satisfy the recent decision by the Kansas Supreme Court declaring the state’s existing school funding formula unconstitutional. Jim McLean is executive editor of KHI News Service in Topeka, a partner in the Heartland Health Monitor http://www.hayspost.com/2016/03/02/brownback-tax-cuts-not-to-blame-for-kansas-revenue-shortfall/

Hey dipshit - you're new here and don't have a clue as to what we discuss . It's best you troll the site and look like a fool than post and erase all doubt HCS is for pussies like you

I'm curios why cutting taxes as Laffer and Friends (The R's) claim has not resulted in higher tax revenue as they claim Instead there is major forum Butthurt and deflection .

So tell the class how trickled on is working in Kansas....

JT meathead . Makes Doe Dumb look smart

Then you should post a response instead of your usual worthless drivel

You're a special kind of stupid. . Kansas is an excellent example of an economic utopia you support. You avoid the discusion because the facts do not support your opinion. You better sign up for the butt plugger site because it won't be long and you'll be another in a long line of fools who got by SnowRider . So far I've been chill' and take'n it easy on here but that can change if I feel like it . You're child's play

I post facts you dumbfuck . Their Supreme Court ruled - not me - and they have until June 30 to fund their schools - which they shortchanged because their state revenue is much lower than expected. . Now - if you have some info to contradict the clear cut facts - post em' or STFU. . And I mean that in a good Christian way

Feel free to dispute the content and results with some facts of your own . Or did you sign Govers pledge and fell beholden to it?

For the newbies - this was a popular thread that illustrates the fallacy that trickled on economics does not work. Kansas and Gov Brownstain are providing an economic utopia for those who believe trickled on economics works...it does not. I like to remind the class about the fallacy they support Now their schools are in trouble because the trickle is not providing the proper tax revenue to support basic services....including schools: Q: What did legislators do in March? A: They increased capital outlay aid by $23.5 million for the 2016-17 school year.To pay for that, they applied the same formula for distributing capital outlay aid to the other, larger pot of aid. The change made the second pot cheaper by nearly $83 million a year. But they also guaranteed that no district would lose any dollars. The state saw no net increase in its overall spending. Attorneys for the four school districts suing the state said lawmakers simply reshuffled existing funds. Q: Why would lawmakers do that? A: They also had to balance the state budget and faced a projected gap of more than $290 million. The state has struggled to stay in the black since Republican legislators slashed personal income taxes at GOP Gov. Sam Brownback's urging in 2012 and 2013 in an effort to stimulate the economy. He hasn't backed off his signature cuts, and enough lawmakers haven't bucked him, so it always was unlikely they would find tens of millions of new dollars for schools. Legislators also faced strong political pressure not to cut aid to wealthier districts to boost funding to poorer ones. http://www.arkcity.net/news/schools-to-close-soon/article_5bc02042-26be-11e6-ab1c-abb993461a25.html?mode=jqm

The HCS clowns are lite weights since they are use to rules and moderators And Momo is just his typical waste of bandwidth....

Hate and angry are two different things Momo

Doe Dumber is the dumbest poster on the site. He's an R hack but thinks he's impartial

Yeah but the lil fella in FBI Brown says otherwise

Momo doesn't count .

Doe Dumber never disappoints . sucking the R cock relentlessly

For the forum FBI What's your excuse gonna be when she's not indicted?