revkevsdi

Suddenly Trump supporters care about the truth. lol.

She stepped down and stood for re-election and won. That only proved to the liberals that they can lie all they want and still get voted in. Years later Dalton Mcsquinty used that information far too often.

It's been a while fuckhead. I thought you were dead. Oh well. You should probably check on your place in Florida.

Yeah, but there are some really nice people there too. Hopefully the racists think it's all a conspiracy so the black man can loot their houses. Then they'll stay put for the storm.

Funny how there is more proof of Russian involvement in the Elections and Trump connections than any of the crazy right wing theories on Obama the secret, Kenyan born, Muslim sleeper who has gay hot tub parties. But many of the people on here making fun of the Russian story supported those stories long after they were proven to be lies.

The only hope is that every time they call for the worst storm, the biggest snowfall etc it rarely happens. So hopefully they call this wrong too.

Yeah corporal heel spurs is a man alright.

Wrong thread

Bohica wanted to know. I thought in this thread we can dispense with the questions over cause or reality. If we have more frequent hurricanes and floods. If we have more droughts that cause forest fires. How much do you think that will cost?

There is not and equal number of charts on both sides. There are far more studies proving man made climate change is real than not real. Fuck even Exxon is revealing that they knew all along and suppressed the information.

Ok so consider two scenarios. A scientist whose resaearch is peer reviewed and shows that climate change is a hoax. Vs a scientist whose peer reviewed research show that climate change is real who would you rather be? Id rather be that guy that could prove it's a hoax. Every major oil firm would pay huge money for that research. They'd pay for more research, speaking tours etc. Look how much they paid for the hack scientists to make up shit to deny climate change.

It's an interesting timeline. Gore does his little movie warning about climate change. He warns that there will be huge costs from extreme weather. Droughts, storms, cold in Europe etc. The majority on here think it's bullshit. Katrina comes along and that was a fluke. People said. Their models are wrong, they said New York would be under water by now. Then New York has a major flood. But that was a perfect storm. Now Houston is under water and you still don't get it. Record forest fires in BC, flooding in Ottawa and Montreal areas, Lake Ontario much higher than normal. What part of extreme weather patterns don't you get?

Why does it matter? It's not like they are going to ask for federal money to rebuild. They voted against New York getting federal funds. I'm sure they will pay for it themselves. Highest flood ever blah blah blah, But it's not changing weather. I wonder if a few more things like this happen in the areas the produce fossil fuels if it will change some opinions. I'm sure no one in Texas gives a flying fuck about Bangladesh, Holland or any pissy little Island nations. But fill the Astrodome with water and someone may take notice.

I'm cool with that. You be careful that you don't float that pontoon boat off the edge of the Earth.

I agree. But I think it's funny how many Republicans only think consequences belong to left leaning people.

You are siding with a flat earther. Let that sink in you stupid fuck.

LOL tell us about your support for free speech you dumb sack of shit.

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change-global-warming-tipping-point-degree-temperature-study-a7869641.html Does this article help?

Well, since you are too stupid to click the link. The basic question was this. Who would be richer and more famous? A scientist whose research agrees with all the other scientists on climate change. Or the scientist that can prove that we aren't the problem. ______________ is the problem carry on having fun. That guy would be rich and famous beyond your wildest dreams. That's common sense that you righties are always claiming is in short supply.

So you want to take a super computer back 40'years and see if it's right? Or are you saying scientists today are wrong because people with incomplete data and a tiny fraction of technical resources 40 years ago made some computing errors?

You didn't answer the question or check the link. That's ok. It would probably upset you. Btw are you deniers the same people that believed the tobacco companies when they claimed that cigarettes weren't harmful? maybe I'm giving too much credit. Do you still believe the cigarette companies?

Where does the money come from? It seems obvious that oil Companies and the Koch brothers have a lot of money to throw around. Do you have a link to show where the scientists whose research supports climate change get their money? https://skepticalscience.com/absurd-claim-climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money.html You probably don't want to think logically about this but click the link and waste 1 minute and 41 seconds of your life. Tell me this guy is wrong.

No it is to stop us from reaching a tipping point. Politicians are involved because they make policy which would help us battle against the most pressing issue of our time.

You know that they are in the middle of proving that Exxon knew. Come on man, look things up, think a little. It's not like the climate change scientists own a special elixir or snake oil they can sell to get rich by faking the data. Climate change is real, it's man made and we are fucked if Trump gets his way and keeps burning coal.

Seriously? You're one of the dumb fucks who says there is nothing to see with Russia because a week goes by without news. Yet years of investigating the Clintons and they are not in jail. 6 months after Trump was elected while leading chants of lock her up and no charges. Do you not think that maybe it's all bullshit that you happily sat at the table and gobbled up?