Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Boonbocker1

Members
  • Posts

    188
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Boonbocker1

  1. Feels a bit unnerving that the engine calibration was that far off just a couple wks ago and they are still talking chassis changes to reduce weight.   I dont know how the engine calibration stuff works but it has to be EPA compliant before production I'd imagine and if its still changing this much that would make me nervous.   Same with chassis changes, seems a bit late in the game to be making changes for the MY25 sleds in my mind.   The re review came off to me as Cat is scrambling to get these working...and we all know how 1st yr anything can be.

  2. 2 minutes ago, jonlafon1 said:

    interesting rumor. Not saying your right or wrong.. But WTF would JD want back into snow biz for? And if Textron wanted out why not sell to Yamaha if they offered? (rumor was they did offer some time ago)? 

     

    Its as odd as Textron wanting Cat all those yrs back.  

  3. They are in the process of buying Cat from Textron.   Recently Deeres social media pages have been advertising that they used to make snowmobiles, they also came out with a line of retro JD snowmobile appeal.  They are creating buzz and excitement around the nostalgia of the brand before announcing they are getting back into the sport by acquiring Cat

    • Haha 1
    • Confused 1
  4. 27 minutes ago, krom said:

    Deja vous all over again..

    Though it came up already in this thread, but its come up hundreds of times so it may not have been this thread..

    Textron in their infinite wisdom marks weighs with the last 3 digits of the pn, and the mass of the weight not including the bushing.
    Everyplace else they label and mention it, the mass of the bushing is included.  So 66g weights are marked 65, 64g weights marked 63 etc.

    Jim thinks this is an innovative and genius move by Cat and texteon and only they are smart enough to ever dream up doing something this earth shattering 

    • Like 1
  5. 23 minutes ago, mnstang said:

    Catalyst is the best thing from cat since 1993.  They're doing ok.  People will be ordering 858's in a couple days.  Same haters today hated cat before Textron.  Now there's Textron and they have a new Boogeyman to hate and can romanticized about the fabled "old guard" that brought you the twin spar and the 2012-2016 procross.

    Firing people ain't bad, I wish my company would fire some people.  Sorry for the hate interruption, continue on.  How bout that horrible catalyst eh

    So the old cat was bad?  And those loyal before textron shouldn't have been?  Trying to understand your logic here.  

    What is it that makes or made cat what it is or was?     The people, culture, management,  the building, the town? Genuinely curious your thoughts here.

     

    It's definitely a different company now than what it used to be.  So are both versions good?  If so. What makes that so?

  6. 47 minutes ago, krom said:

    Another big round of firing engineers in trf happened. 

    Shocked @ZR6000RR didn't post the info and list of names, with all his contacts and inside knowledge 

    Hope they retained some of the good old boys from the pre textron days.   Probably not tho.   Really isn't much left of the old cat as far as people and culture

    • Sad 1
  7. 12 hours ago, ZR6000RR said:

    Show me proof they have. If you have none. Shut the FUCK UP! Have a great weekend.

     

    It's a belt drive system similiar to poos.  Contrary to your belief and the marketing hype around it, it's nothing special.  Parts will and do fail.  Cat isn't using some secret belt material or sprocket tooth geometry here and surely their suppliers are only capable of the same machine tolerances for the bearing bores in which controls the center to center distances and alignment of said sprockets.    Don't be an ignorant fool here and continue to believe that these are indestructible and somehow whisper quiet.   Any gates poly chain used in any application or industry is capable of failing.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
×
×
  • Create New...
Unread Content