XC.Morrison

Bullshit, asshole. That tweet was from March of 2019 and nothing to do with rona. In January of 2020 she was putting together a comprehensive strategy. Rep Clown Show.

When and what did I ever proclaim? Go fly a kite, hoser.

You’re thinking of Procter and Gamble.

The Phizer doses are really small though, only 30 micrograms. Moderna is 100 micrograms. So three does of Phizer would still be smaller than one of Moderna. Go big or go home

Looks like you can get the same rare thing from actual Covid so if you don’t get vaccinated you can still be a moron: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2009191 Side note: let’s ban peanuts because they kill way more than any of these friggin vaccines you dildo headed fuckwits.

Audio works fine for me. https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMewCGK65/

No he didn’t. Fauci has been critical of high CT since at least July 2020. His comments on testing begin around 4:24

Well, no.

I didn’t know that….boy do I have egg on my face.

Whitmer did as much or more than most other Governors to help lower gas prices in 2020. She had demand way down in Michigan.

It wasn’t changed. The author is trying to suggest that the CDC was previously trying to perform genomic sequencing on samples with CT’s greater than 28. He then talks about how testing has been done yielding CT’s greater, 40ish. Yes, there have been tests that yielded low viral loads, but Tyler Durden never provided links to where the CDC was requesting higher CT’s be sent in for genomic sequencing. The CDC gives their explanation for requesting low CT (high viral load samples) to be sent in is because “high CT samples aren’t feasible for sequencing. “. They’re doing more sequencing now because the Biden admin increased funding for it in order to track the mutations. In searching for confirmation, I stumbled across the following information which predates the pandemic and is in regards to viral testing in hogs, but their findings make sense when looking at the current CDC request: “It was shown that samples with a CT less than 30 had a very high ORF5 sequencing success rate (99.85%). Samples with CT from 30-32 still had over 90% sequencing success rate (92.80%). For samples with Ct 32-34, the ORF5 sequencing success rates were 81.79%. However, when the Ct values of the samples increased over 34, the ORF5 sequencing success rate decreased dramatically (58.92% for samples with Ct 34-36 and 40% for samples with Ct 36-37).” https://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/health/prrsv-sequencing-success-dependent-upon-cycle-threshold-values

Dude you’re retarded for Trump. This guy is not a member of BLM nor Antifa. He’s got equally as many connections to Proud Boys. BLM had warned others about this guy since last summer saying not to trust him. He’s a provocateur looking to become famous and make a name for himself by filming chaos. His only allegiance is to himself.

It wasn’t changed. The author is trying to suggest that the CDC was previously trying to perform genomic sequencing on samples with CT’s greater than 28. He then talks about how testing has been done yielding CT’s greater, 40ish. Yes, there have been tests that yielded low viral loads, but Tyler Durden never provided links to where the CDC was requesting higher CT’s be sent in for genomic sequencing. The CDC gives their explanation for requesting low CT (high viral load samples) to be sent in is because “high CT samples aren’t feasible for sequencing. “ In searching for confirmation, I stumbled across the following information which predates the pandemic and is in regards to viral testing in hogs, but their findings make sense when looking at the current CDC request: “It was shown that samples with a CT less than 30 had a very high ORF5 sequencing success rate (99.85%). Samples with CT from 30-32 still had over 90% sequencing success rate (92.80%). For samples with Ct 32-34, the ORF5 sequencing success rates were 81.79%. However, when the Ct values of the samples increased over 34, the ORF5 sequencing success rate decreased dramatically (58.92% for samples with Ct 34-36 and 40% for samples with Ct 36-37).” https://www.nationalhogfarmer.com/health/prrsv-sequencing-success-dependent-upon-cycle-threshold-values

What’s funny is I was just researching information on jeans cause I need a new pair and after seeing this post I was like, this has to be Zam posting as Snoopy https://www.styleforum.net/threads/first-pair-of-nice-jeans.649231/post-9860637

It’s bad because certain folks want to make the vaccines look ineffective to justify their anti vaccine position. Nobody here of course but in the broader community I know a few like this.

It’s just a cold.

I gots linqs, yo https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2021/05/14/politics/democrats-vaccination-rates-house-mask-rules/index.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.businessinsider.com/just-45-of-house-republicans-say-theyve-gotten-a-covid-19-vaccine-2021-5%3Famp

You should step outside your echo chamber more often. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/may/18/facebook-posts/no-fauci-and-fda-head-didnt-say-40-50-cdc-fda-staf/

Prove it wrong, I’ll wait.