Are all Democrats as Stupid?

[XCR1250]

New York mayor Bill de Blasio called to ban gas hookups in new buildings in the city by 2030, during his State of the City address on Thursday.

Previously, in February 2020, De Blasio proposed banning the use of oil and natural gas in all residential and commercial buildings by 2040, as part of a push to update city infrastructure to run on renewable energy. The mayor updated this proposal on Thursday by calling for an end to gas hookups, while working to ensure the ban doesn’t adversely affect low-income homeowners, Politico reported.

“We need to make clear that New York City will renounce fossil fuels fully,” de Blasio said in his address. “Therefore, we need to ban fossil fuel connections in the city by the end of this decade, literally ensuring that our only choice is renewable energy.”

 

De Blasio also called for the city to draw its electricity from renewable sources including Canadian hydropower.

“With this new asset, New York City’s government will run on 100 percent renewable energy in the next four years,” de Blasio said.

The mayor’s proposal to ban gas hookups is one of many such plans circulating throughout the U.S., in bids to wean localities off fossil fuels. The city of Denver, Col., will consider a plan to make new homes dependent on electric power by 2027.

 

De Blasio Proposes Banning Gas Hookups in New NYC Buildings by 2030

 

 

 

Zachary Evans

Fri, January 29, 2021, 11:09 AM

 

[Sleepr2]

Never ask a liberal “ are you that stupid?   They take it as a challenge.

[XCR1250]

Or this:

The Washington Post slammed New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, D., over his "bad" remark Friday dismissing the importance of an accurate count of COVID-related nursing home deaths. 

Cuomo remained defiant during a press conference on Friday after his state Attorney General Letitia James released a report that Cuomo's Department of Health may have underreported coronavirus deaths in nursing homes by as much as 50 percent. 

"Look, whether a person died in a hospital or died in a nursing home, it’s -- the people died," Cuomo said, later asking, "Who cares? 33 [percent], 28 [percent], died in a hospital, died in a nursing home. They died!"

 

That drew fire from the Post, which ran the headline, "Andrew Cuomo’s bad ‘who cares’ answer on coronavirus nursing-home data." 

"From public policy perspective, though, we should care," Post senior political reporter Aaron Blake reacted. "A death is indeed a death, but there are major and very valid questions about whether nursing-home policies led to unnecessary ones. To the extent more deaths occurred in or came from that setting, it allows us to evaluate how significant that problem was and how much corrective action is needed. Cuomo has to know that."

 

Blake insisted Cuomo's "Who cares?" remark was delivered "defensively and ill-advisedly" after the governor was previously hailed by the media for his "candor and humility" at his daily press briefings in the early months of the pandemic.

"That is decidedly not what happened Friday," Blake declared. 

While the controversy doesn't definitely conclude that New York was "particularly derelict" regarding the nursing home deaths, the Post reporter stressed James' report "raises the very real prospect of a cover-up, given how much of a negative narrative this was for so many months about his handling of the virus."

 

"There is indeed a tendency to try to look for people to blame in such situations. But that’s because something very bad has happened, and everyone in a position of power must be open to being second-guessed and to their claims and actions being subject to scrutiny," Blake wrote. "Instead, Cuomo suggested this is much ado about nothing — which, regardless of his actual culpability for the bad data, is hardly the pittance he implied."