jtssrx

No stupid ass they purposely undercounted the deaths in nursing homes. These deaths were counted as covid deaths but hidden in the reports. just go kill yourself you fucking cunt.

Anti vaxx lmao 🤣 your ad hominem attacks are laughable retard you don’t know anything about vaccines. Did you know the flu vaccine hasn’t done anything to reduce the annual number of deaths of the flu. The number of annual deaths of the flu actually increased since the CDC started pushing for mass vaccination for the flu in the 1980’s. there is also strong evidence that Aids from polio vaccine trials. Aids and the Polio Vaccine Edward Hooper finds new evidence Edward Hooper Four years ago I wrote The River, a book in which I argued for a new theory of how the Aids pandemic began. The book proved very controversial, and provoked what I would consider a defensive response from many in the scientific community, who damned the theory on insubstantial grounds. I am returning to this subject now because there is new evidence, both historical and scientific, to demonstrate that the theory was buried prematurely. After 27 million deaths and the infection of more than 66 million people with HIV, there are now strong indications that human hands – in particular, those of the doctor and the scientist – started the Aids pandemic. This is not the theory of origin favoured by most in the medical establishment: the familiar ‘cut hunter’ or natural transfer theory proposes that a single hunter or bushmeat seller became infected with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) while skinning or butchering a chimp, and that the pandemic started from that one infection. The theory of origin that I supported in The Riveris the OPV (oral polio vaccine) theory, and it requires a little background. In the 1950s, OPVs were prepared in primate cells, as most still are today. As a result, each OPV contained not only weakened poliovirus, but also whichever monkey viruses happened to be present in the cell substrate. One such virus was SV-40 (the 40thsimian virus to be discovered), which was found in 1960 to cause tumours in hamsters. By then, tens of millions of people around the world had been given SV-40-contaminated polio vaccines, and over the next two years the producers switched from using Asian monkeys, which are susceptible to infection with SV-40, to African monkeys, which are not. Forty years on, it is recognised that exposure to SV-40 leads to a slightly heightened risk of contracting certain cancers such as mesothelioma. But the OPV theory relates to a different polio vaccine. It proposes that an experimental polio vaccine called CHAT, developed at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia, initiated the Aids pandemic by introducing simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) from the common chimpanzee into some of the million Africans who were given the vaccine between 1957 and 1960. Chimpanzee SIV is now widely recognised as the direct ancestor of the strain of HIV (HIV-1 Group M) that has caused approximately 99 per cent of infections to date. In Africa, CHATvaccine was administered only in Belgian-ruled territories: the Belgian Congo (now the Democratic Republic of Congo) and the former UN trusteeship of Ruanda-Urundi (now Rwanda and Burundi). These are also the countries that represent the epicentre of Group M-related Aids. The Laboratoire Médical de Stanleyville (LMS), which tested CHAT vaccine for safety and co-ordinated the early African vaccinations, was situated just a few miles from a chimpanzee colony, Lindi camp, which operated between 1956 and 1960. During those years, more than five hundred chimps and pygmy chimps (bonobos) were sacrificed there, mostly in the course of the polio research. It has sometimes been claimed that people do not become HIV-infected by the oral route. This is demonstrably wrong: gay men have become infected after having only oral sex, and there are several recorded instances in which babies of HIV-negative mothers have been infected through being breast-fed by HIV-positive wet nurses. All mucosal cells, including those of the mouth and throat, represent potential portals of entry for HIVs and SIVs, and the likelihood of infection increases when there are oral lesions, such as those caused by teething or mouth ulcers. The dendritic cells around the tonsils are also significant target cells for HIV, and much of the CHAT administered in Africa, in contrast to OPVs given elsewhere, was delivered by a squirt with a syringe to the back of the throat. By September 2000, in the run-up to a Royal Society conference on the origin of HIV and Aids, half a dozen samples of CHAT vaccine selected from the freezers at the Wistar Institute had been independently tested in three separate labs. No trace of HIV, SIV or chimpanzee DNAwas found. Rather surprisingly, given that none of the samples selected had been prepared specifically for the African trials, the results were widely taken by medical journals, and by the press at large, as concrete proof against the OPVtheory. In April 2001, brief reports by the labs that had tested the CHAT samples were published in Nature and Science, and both journals made a big splash of the findings in editorials and commentaries. Robin Weiss’s piece in Nature was headed ‘Polio vaccines exonerated’, as if the safety of all such vaccines were in question, and ended with the claim that ‘some beautiful facts have destroyed an ugly theory.’ Weiss wrongly stated that the samples had ‘included the OPV batch (designated CHAT 13) used in Leopoldville’, confusing the terms ‘pool’ and ‘batch’. To explain the importance of his error requires a brief digression into how polio vaccines are made. Passaging (growing) a virus such as poliovirus in different substrates or tissue cultures (sheets of animal cells grown in vitro, in the laboratory) alters the pathogenicity of the virus. What polio vaccine-makers are looking for is a weakened, or attenuated version that will produce protective antibodies in humans, but not the disease itself. A ‘pool’ of polio vaccine describes material produced at a specific level of attenuation – ‘Pool 9’, for instance, might indicate a poliovirus that has been attenuated by being passaged 28 times through chick embryo tissue culture, and eight times through monkey kidney tissue culture. (In most American and European virology labs in the 1950s, this meant kidney cells from macaques, a species of monkey found in India and the Philippines; it was the accepted final substrate for most polio vaccines.) By contrast, a specific ‘batch’ of Pool 9 would describe a quantity of vaccine that had been prepared from that pool on a specific date in a specific lab: in other words, in a single production run. In practice, batches are prepared by taking a small quantity of the vaccine pool (or a batch made from that pool), and amplifying it by a final passage in monkey kidney tissue culture. The different numbered pools of CHAT vaccine had all been made at the Wistar Institute, or later at pharmaceutical houses, mainly in the USA and Belgium. The crucial factor, however, is where and how the individual batches were made. Some of these batches, I have now found, were prepared in labs far from the US and Belgium, and in substrates derived from different species of primate. Just a few days before the articles appeared in Nature and Science, some colleagues and I had made a remarkable discovery in Kisangani (formerly Stanleyville). We tracked down and talked to three former lab technicians who had worked at LMS in the late 1950s. Just five minutes into his interview, one of the virology technicians, Jacques Kanyama, revealed that batches of CHAT vaccine had been prepared locally in Stanleyville. This was the detail I had missed in The River. Until now, all the Belgian and American witnesses who had worked at LMS, or who had been involved with CHAT, had insisted that the vaccine had not, indeed could not, have been made locally. They didn’t have the equipment, they said; they couldn’t possibly have produced a vaccine at a primitive lab like that. But Kanyama explained that he had started working in Paul Osterrieth’s virology department at LMS on 12 February 1958, and that Osterrieth had already been making polio vaccine before his arrival. He described how Osterrieth would bring the vaccine from his sterile room, after which the assistants would divide it into phials. Each time a new order came in, Osterrieth made fresh polio vaccine. Sometimes the technicians also helped with immunisations, and Kanyama recalled one particular episode when they took the vaccine across the river to Lukusa military camp to vaccinate the soldiers and their families, giving each person a few drops by mouth. This not only established a chain of custody, but also identified the vaccine as CHAT, the only vaccine then given by mouth in the Congo. It was now essential to discover which primate tissue cultures the Stanleyville doctors had used to prepare the vaccine. Philippe Elebe worked from April 1956 as a technician in the microbiology department (where Osterrieth had worked until the virology section opened in 1957). He told us that they had indeed been producing tissue culture, and that he had been in charge of culture media – the balanced salt solutions, sera and antibiotics that are used to keep cultures alive and biologically ‘sterile’ (free from known pathogens). We asked which primate had been used to make the tissue cultures, and Elebe’s reply was prompt: ‘Surtout les chimpanzés.’ After returning from Africa, I did further research. It transpired that there were no rules in the 1950s about which primate cells to use for growing polio vaccines: any species could be used provided it made good cultures. Chimp kidneys made ‘very good’ cultures, with ‘very good’ sensitivity to poliovirus. And it was routine practice for oral polio vaccine to be amplified locally, in labs around the world. Some virologists, including Albert Sabin, whose sugar lump OPV was adopted for use the world over, acknowledged this fact in their publications. Others, including makers of CHAT vaccine, did not. However, the papers written about vaccinations in Poland in 1959-60 by collaborators of the Wistar Institute reveal that the titre (concentration) of the CHAT vaccine had risen tenfold between the time of its arrival at the virology department of the State Institute of Hygiene in Warsaw and the moment, a few weeks later, when the vaccine was diluted and distributed to smaller labs around the country. Because vaccine titre decreases with time and temperature change, the only possible explanation was that the titre had been boosted by further passage in primate cells in Warsaw prior to dilution. The primates used by the Polish scientists were the standard Asian macaques, which are not naturally infected with SIV. This indicates why, of the seven million children given CHAT in Poland, and the million elsewhere in Europe, none became HIV-infected as a result. For trials in Africa (then at least two days from the US by plane), the standard practice was to fly a small bottle of the vaccine, packed in an ice-box, to the destination lab, where it was amplified in whichever primate cells were locally available. This meant that less vaccine had to be transported, and that vaccine quantity and titre could be boosted on arrival. The higher the titre, the more it could be diluted and the more people could be vaccinated. By the second half of the 1950s, virologists in South Africa were using African green monkey cells to amplify the Sabin vaccines, while their colleagues in French West Africa and French Equatorial Africa were apparently using cells from baboons (and perhaps other species, too) to amplify the Pasteur Institute vaccines of Pierre Lepine. In Stanleyville, they had the Lindi chimpanzees. This new information does not prove that CHATvaccine started Aids, but it does significantly strengthen the OPV hypothesis. Over the last three years, various ‘disproofs’ have been put forward, but none stands up to scrutiny. One claim involved an attempt to calculate whether a potential contaminating virus such as chimp SIV could have survived the vaccine-making process, and concluded that the chances were trillions to one against. This is wrong. The tissue cultures used in Stanleyville, at least until mid-1958, were clearly of a primitive type that would have provided ideal substrates not just for attenuated polioviruses, but also for SIVs. At least some of these cultures also employed chimpanzee sera to nourish the cells, which means there was substantial potential for recombination (the exchange of fragments of DNA) between different SIV strains in vitro. It has also been claimed, for instance by a group of researchers led by Beatrice Hahn, Bette Korber and Paul Sharp, that Aids could not have started in the 1950s, because their calculations reveal that the first HIV infection (the so-called ‘Eve virus’) must have existed in the 1940s or 1930s. However, in Science last July, Jon Cohen, the magazine’s leading Aids correspondent, wrote about a ‘beautiful study’ of rampant recombination in the spleen of an HIV-infected patient, observing that the research raised ‘serious questions about phylogeny trees that attempt to date the origin of HIV, all of which discard suspected recombinants to make the data interpretable’. Cohen was only stating what other scientists had been murmuring for some time: that the phylogenetic model used by Hahn, Sharp and Korber to date the epidemic appears inherently flawed, in that it allows for evolution through mutation, but not through recombination, which is now revealed as a major factor in the development of immunodeficiency viruses. Another geneticist, Mikkel Schierup, has pointed out that all it would have required to generate the diversity of HIV-1 variants seen in the world today would be two different chimp SIVs which somehow recombined in humans. Such an event could have happened in vivo (for instance in human vaccinees) or in vitro (for instance in polio vaccines cultured in chimp cells and later fed to humans). The Hahn group has also insisted that the closest ancestor of HIV-1 is the SIV found in chimpanzees from west central Africa, and that the chimp SIVs from the Democratic Republic of Congo and central Africa are more distantly related. I believe this is a dangerous claim, and not only because recent mitochondrial DNAanalysis suggests that the chimps from these two regions should be redesignated as a single subspecies. Even now, there are only four available SIV sequences from the west central African chimps, and just two from the central African chimps. The latter are slightly less closely related to HIV-1, but crucially they differ massively from each other, which emphasises the urgent need for extensive SIV testing right across the chimpanzee range. The five hundred common chimps and eighty bonobos that were housed at Lindi were collected from a vast area – 100,000 square miles of the Congolese rain forest – and we know that at least one chimp (which survived at Lindi for more than two years) came from the Mbandaka area, so may well have been one of Hahn’s west central African chimps. Because cages and play-cages were shared, just one such SIV-infected chimp might have caused widespread SIV infection throughout the colony. So even if Hahn is right, it doesn’t disprove the OPV theory. Perhaps the most important area of this debate, however, relates to the early epidemiology of Aids. We know that CHAT vaccine was administered in at least 27 different places, all in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Burundi. I have found that 68 per cent of all the earliest Aids cases in Africa (and therefore, with minor exceptions, the world), and 76 per cent of all the earliest HIV infections in the continent, come from the very same towns and villages where CHAT was administered between 1957 and 1960. Recently, a software programme has been devised to analyse five competing theories for the emergence of Aids in Africa – and found that only the OPV scenario achieved a good fit. The most interesting argument against OPV has been put forward by two American scientists, Preston Marx and Ernest Drucker. They take the cut hunter/natural transfer scenario (which, theoretically, might have occurred at any point during the last few million years, since chimps and humans became separate species), and provide it with a plausible timeframe. They do this by proposing an amplification factor: the arrival in Africa of disposable needles, which were nonetheless reused. Needle deliveries to Africa experienced an exponential rise in the 1950s. This is a theory not of iatrogenic origin, but of iatrogenic spread. It is the only version of the ‘cut hunter’ theory that seems at all credible; otherwise, supporters of the theory have to rely on urbanisation as the factor that allowed a primate virus that had recently passed to humans suddenly to explode. In fact, this explosion would have to have happened not just once, but four times almost simultaneously, since in addition to the pandemic strain, three other HIVs have emerged and become established in Africa in the last fifty to seventy years, infecting between a few hundred thousand and a few dozen persons in each case. These minor outbreaks fit rather well with the OPV theory, for it is known that experimental French-made polio vaccines were tested in the 1950s in both French Equatorial Africa and French West Africa – the epicentres of the three minor HIV outbreaks. Among the primates the French were using for their research were chimps and sooty mangabeys, the SIVs of which are the closest relatives to the HIV strains associated with the outbreaks. The Marx/Drucker theory has been embraced by the scientific establishment, even though the medical profession plays a key role in it. This may be because the theory is non-specific, so that no individual physicians or institutions can be held responsible. And there is an unspoken subtext: that the physicians in question were probably not Western ones. However, the reuse of unsterilised needles did not happen only in the Belgian Congo, so this theory doesn’t explain the strong correlation between early HIV/Aids and the 27 known CHAT vaccination sites. In recent weeks there has been a new spin on the needles debate, provided by David Gisselquist. He heads a group of American academics who conducted a survey of various epidemiological studies of HIV, which they combined with the proposal that levels of sexual activity in Africa can be roughly equated with those in America and Europe. They came up with a remarkable claim, which elicited much press coverage, that in marked contrast to previous analyses, 60 per cent of all HIV spread in Africa was caused by unsterilised needles and unscreened transfusions, and only some 30 per cent by sex. (The usual ball-park figures are 10 per cent for parenteral – or blood-borne – transmission and 80 per cent for sexual.) ‘For the last 15 years,’ Gisselquist commented to Reuters, ‘the Aids establishment somehow got on to the notion that we need to scare people about sex to prevent HIV transmission.’ The Gisselquist group provides a long list of surveys they have examined, and impressive pages of mathematical formulae, but their research smacks of a lack of experience of the African epidemic on the ground. They highlight early HIV surveys conducted between 1984 and 1988, but the experience of most people who worked on Aids in Africa during that period is very different. In Uganda, which was probably the first country in the world to experience a visible community-wide Aids epidemic, almost every survey from 1985 onwards reveals intermediate levels of HIV-1 infection for 0-to-4-year-olds (presumably largely caused by perinatal spread), which plummet to virtually zero for 5-to-14-year-olds, then rise steeply for the ages of 15 to 45 for women, and 20 to 55 for men, before tailing off to zero for older individuals. Yet all age groups and both sexes would have experienced comparable exposure to unsterile injections and unsafe transfusions. The ‘Christmas tree’ pattern, which was recognised right across the continent in the 1980s, is strongly suggestive of a pathogen that is spread largely by the sexual route, with only minor roles played by perinatal and parenteral spread. Of course, the more publicity that is given to claims that dirty needles are responsible for most of the HIV spread in Africa, the easier it becomes to promote the idea that dirty needles might also have initiated the epidemic. And there is clearly some linkage between the two theories, since one of Gisselquist’s co-authors is Ernest Drucker. My own belief (based on many years’ study of African epidemiological surveys) is that parenteral spread may have increased in importance since the start of the epidemic, and that nowadays it might cause between 10 and 20 per cent of new infections. Most of those who have studied the African epidemic at close range believe that Gisselquist’s estimates are speculative, and that some of his public utterances are simply irresponsible, given how many people are eager to hear, dying to hear, that unprotected sex is not so dangerous after all. The arguments, denials and protestations will continue for some time, but I believe that over the next few years it will gradually come to be realised that the Aids pandemic was sparked by large-scale field trials of an experimental polio vaccine – trials that employed African ‘volunteers’ as guinea pigs. An extended version of this article, entitled ‘Dephlogistication, Imperial Display, Apes, Angels and the Return of Mr Emile Zola’, is available online at www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/AIDS/.

This cunt along with the Governors from Illinois California New York New Jersey and Pennsylvania should all be indicted for the murder of tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands of vulnerable senior citizens that lived in these nursing homes

Go get another booster stupid ass.

Vaccines

And it killed him

Apparently you can’t read

By no means do I think trump is clean. But you can't tell me after 6 years of digging that if he committed a crime they wouldn't have found it by now

The indictment alleges Mosby lied on federal loan applications, including one where she asserted she experienced "adverse financial consequences" in her position as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, while prosecutors say her gross salary of nearly $250,000 was never reduced in 2020. In fact, the indictment says Mosby's gross salary increased by nearly $10,000 between 2019 and 2020. As a result of her relief application, Mosby received $36,000, which she used "toward a down payment for a vacation home in Kissimmee Florida" that she purchased in September 2020. Julio Cortez/AP, FILE Maryland State Attorney Marilyn Mosby speaks during a news conference announcing th...Read More The indictment accuses Mosby of making false statements on applications for a mortgages of nearly $500,000 for the Kissimmee, Florida, home and a nearly $430,000 mortgage for a condominium in Long Boat Key, Florida. If convicted of the charges, the U.S. Attorney's Office in Maryland said Mosby faces a maximum sentence of five years in prison for each of the two counts of perjury and a maximum of 30 years for each of the two counts of making false mortgage applications, though actual sentences for such crimes are typically less than the maximum penalties. MORE: For the few black women prosecutors, hate and ‘misogynoir’ are part of life Mosby has not entered a plea to any of the charges and has not had her initial appearance scheduled as of Thursday evening. A spokesperson for Mosby did not immediately respond to a request for comment Thursday evening.

Triggered Oh just an FYI Saget got his boost about a month ago now.

it still boggles my mind that people can't objectively look at the deaths/death rate and not understand that this entire thing is a HOAX. The CDC admits now that 75 plus % that they labeled as dying of covid died with covid and had four or more comorbidities. it's very clear who wants to continue to lock people down. It's 100% left-leaning people. These are the same people that say the right wants to take away your rights as they force you to take a vaccine, wear a mask, and lock yourself in your home

In a somewhat shocking video segment, CNN host Erin Burnett actually told the truth last night about Biden’s rhetoric in Atlanta this week and debunked his lies about Georgi’s new election law. Watch: First, Burnett points out that even Democrats like Dick Durbin say Biden went too far in painting the case for election reform as a case of ‘right vs racism’. She says that, on its face, Biden’s characterization of voter suppression is a problem because “more people voted than ever before in the last election.” But even more so, she went on to point out that Biden’s criticism of Georgia’s new law is hard to stomach, specifically when New York’s election laws are more restrictive than Georgia’s new law with respect to vote by mail and early voting. After playing video of Biden saying that states like Georgia are making it harder for people to vote by mail because they force people to request absentee ballots, Burnett says: Burnet then tackles Biden’s lies about Georgia’s new early voting policy, saying that Georgia allows for 17 days of early voting but the reliably Democratic state of New York only has 9 days. That’s where the video stops. She may go on to spew garbage after this, I don’t know. But for these two minutes Burnett presents the same facts that we and others presented last year, debunking Biden’s wild lies about Georgia’s new voting law. For finally telling the truth we applaud her and hope she’s turning over a new leaf and will keep it up. I know, that’s wishful thinking.

A Conversation with a Congressman Larry Schweikart Jan 14 I had a conversation with a friend, a ranking Republican congressman who shall go nameless, about current goings-on in Washington. First, we discussed the situation with the January 6/Patriot Day investigation committed. “This was all a set-up by agent provocateurs, wasn’t it?” I asked. “Absolutely. We don’t think there’s much question the FBI was involved.” Senator Ted Cruz really went after them, I noted. “He could have been more aggressive,” the Congressman said. “He could have pushed them to deny any involvement, rather than offer up nebulous claims they had ‘no knowledge.’” “Agree,” I said, “But at least it was nice to see him attacking. This seems to indicate a shift in the winds, that he thought it was safe now to go after them.” “Yes. There has been a shift.” (It should be noted that on another occasion I asked why more on our side—-including himself—-hadn’t come out with more public support for the Patriot Day political prisoners, and he said “Many of us are working from the inside to try to help.” This led me to consider the possibility that perhaps this inside pressure had mitigated some of the plea agreements and so on, but we did not get into details. Our conversation shifted to the FBI itself. “It’s truly frightening what a political gestapo they have become,” I observed. He said, “I have even been working on a book on this. The organization needs to be dissolved, top to bottom, and replaced with something much smaller and subject to real control.” “I don’t think the current organization can be fixed,” I said. “It isn’t just a few bad apples at the top. It’s throughout. Am I wrong on this?” “No. You’re right. Not a single whistleblower came forward during the Russia Hoax. Not one. Ok, I could see a lower-level agent not resigning, losing a career, but to have not one say that what was going on with the Russia investigation wasn’t corrupt? That was eye-opening.” “It shows that the claim by people like Hannity that “the ‘rank-and-file’ are solid guys, only the top needs to be replaced” is completely misguided,” I said. “And you can’t ‘reform it,’ he answered. “If you try to do that, it will make matters worse, because they the organization will have the endorsement of the reformers. The whole thing is bad, and these guys are way too full of their own power. It’s been this way from the beginning, with Hoover. It needs to be dismantled and replaced. But you have to do it right. You can’t just rip it down. I think there is a place for a federal law enforcement operation—-we do have federal laws, for example. But it must be much smaller and much more accountable and you need to have this ready to go when you take this organization down.” We then shifted to what it would take to actually do this—-and many other necessary acts to fix D.C. “So Congressman Thomas Massie has been the first to come out and say we need to eliminate the FBI and CIA. How many MAGA/true conservatives would it take to accomplish this? Let’s leave aside the Senate for now, cuz that’s a different animal.” “I think you would have to get many of the moderates involved. And that would be hard. Many of them don’t even believe there is anything wrong; many others can’t say so because of where their districts are.,” he replied. ”Well,” I said, “this is sort of what I am asking. What would it take to move the Overton Window so that the ‘moderate’ position is really the MAGA position in the House?” “I think you’d probably need at least 40-45 MAGA people to come in. There are about 40 moderates in there now.” “So,” I said, “in 2022, some are saying Republicans could get 30, or 40, or more seats. Now all of those wouldn’t be MAGA or conservatives, but a lot would, right?” “Yes. I think we’re looking at around 40 to 45 pickups, max. Remember we won about 20 seats in 2020 even when Trump was losing. People forget that. So that makes it harder to get 60 or 65 seats right there. Still, we’re in for a wave.” “Ok. What makes you say that?” I asked. “I mean, I believe it, but I’d like to know what you know.” “I’ll just give you one example. Lee Zeldin is running for governor of New York—-very, very blue. He tells me that he has independents and a lot of Democrats coming out for him saying they are just sick of how the Democrats have run things.” I pointed out that so far 26 Democrats have announced they won’t be running for reelection, and he noted that was a very good sign. He just thought the whole Biden administration was imploding, and that it would only get worse for them. All in all, I was extremely encouraged. Someone at his position would be realistic about the numbers. Most of all, it was good to see that there is real, serious discussion in D.C. about addressing the thuggery at the FBI and DOJ. Good talk, dad.

@EvilBird You're correct I don't care what anyone thinks about me.

What's hilarious to me is it's well known that our government lies. Gulf of tokin, operation northwoods, The JFK assassination the list goes on and on. But you still have a large number of people on this board that defend everything the government says and does Look at the attention jan 6th has gotten compared to the Vegas shooting. the federal government didn't do any investigations on Vegas but they are still pushing the false narritive on 1/6 a year later. They did everything possible to run from investigating Vegas 911 much like Peral Harbor were both planned. The Moon landing is laughable

Robert Barns said the justification for this is hospitals regularly mandate vaccines for workers and this mandate has a well defined medical and religious exception. So those that don’t want it will be able to object. I agree with you these mandates should be struck down across the board regardless of exceptions.

Three players drop out of Australian Open with chest issues while Djokovic awaits his fate Several fully vaccinated tennis players participating in the Australian Open qualifying rounds have complained about tiredness and breathing problems. Published: January 10, 2022, 7:58 am 136SHARES Share Tweet The stakes are high for the organizers who have been keeping tennis star Novak Djokovic as a prisoneraccording to his parents. The player has won the tournament nine times, including the past three years and is currently tied with Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal for most major victories of all time, namely 20. Djokovic has been confined to a small room in a Melbourne hotel since the Australian authorities denied him entrance to the country, overriding his medical exemption. Australia has been living up to its history as a penitentiary with its farcical zero-Covid policy and skyrocketing number of infections. Djokovic’s visa was cancelled on arrival and 34-year-old Serb is now languishing in a Melbourne immigration detention facility in a bid to prevent his deportation. Three players drop out All the tennis players currently participating in the professional tennis tournament have been fully vaccinated. The world number 22 was however seen leaving the court and abandoning his match while clutching his chest with respiratory difficulties in an ATP match. Nikoloz Basilashvili told his team that “every shot I’m out of breath”. Colin Fleming, a commentator for Stan Sport, described Basilashvili’s symptoms as “very concerning” and added: “If you feel like you can’t take any kind of deep breath at this level and this intensity, that’s an issue.” Tennis website OpenCourt claimed Basilashvili “may have been recovering from Covid”, but this could not be verified. “[He] told the trainer he had Covid ’10 days ago’,” the outlet said on social media. His contender Stefanos Tsitsipas instead blamed the heat, not Covid, for Basilashvili dropping out in an interview with Tennis World USA: “Sometimes it’s a bit too hot. You could fry an egg on the court, but we are ready for difficult matches and also the excitement.” Clearly the heat had not bothered other players and some had even welcomed the weather conditions in Melbourne. Dalila Jakupovic, who was forced to retire from her match after having dropped to the ground, told news outlet The Western Australian: “I was really scared that I would collapse. That’s why I went onto the floor because I couldn’t walk anymore. I don’t have asthma and never had breathing problems. I actually like heat. The physio came again and I thought it would be better. But the points were a bit longer and I just couldn’t breathe anymore and I just fell on the floor.” Nick Kyrgios, the world’ number 93 player suffered breathing difficulties in the morning and pulled out of the match six hours before he was meant to play. Bernard Tomic also had to take medical time out after complaining of breathing difficulties during the early stages of the second set, but he managed to soldier on. “No air is going in. I’m getting tired so easy,” Tomic was heard telling medical staff. “Is anyone else complaining today?” he wanted to know. “No, it’s been okay,” said the medic. The panicked organizers of the Australian Open now blame the poor “air quality” which appears to be targeting only some players. Melbourne’s air quality is ranked as “good” by international standards. ‘Breathing difficulties’ plague the vaccinated There were no “air quality” issues for the soccer player from a Qatari club who collapsed during a game on Saturday as a result of a heart attack, according to his club. Footage from the match between Al Wakra and Al Rayyan clubs shows player Othman Coulibaly falling to the ground and starting to convulse. He previously played for Panathinaikos. The Qatar Stars League, Qatar’s national football league, said in a statement that Coulibaly has suffered a heart attack and is receiving medical care. The match was suspended and will resume at a later date. This is yet another example of a top athlete collapsing on the field. The 25-year-old Marcos Menaldo from Guatemala died a few days ago during training. The fully vaccinated player had complained of breathing problems. Security meanwhile found American comedy star Bob Saget’s lifeless body in a room at the Ritz-Carlton hotel in Orlando, Florida. Saget had recently confirmed that he had been boosted.

Four justices clearly thought it was unconstitutional and Kavanagh a Trump appointment should be siding with the constitution not a federal agency that’s not even aloud to exist bases on the constitution. Roberts is a political hack

Hey gaslighter, not every person has adverse reactions to vaccines. Do You know in the 1970’s there was a H1N1 pandemic. The feds were pushing vaccines and people started dying and having terrible adverse reactions to the vaccines. Unlike today the msm went after the feds and the feds pulled the vaccines. Furthermore these vaccines do not stop you from getting or spreading covid. Even worse many have died after being infected with covid after they were double and triple vaccinated no all but some. So please explain why a vaccine that doesn’t work and in many cases has injured people is Necessary? Explain why mandates for anyone are aloud?

https://youtube.com/shorts/GsMAKyBPGSE?feature=share

They don’t have the power to mandate anything. They count on people complying. Don’t do it fuck these lunatics

https://youtube.com/shorts/Dg_G86e62SM?feature=share

It you got any covid vaccine you don’t have a brain

It’s not 30k they are flat out lying about the numbers. The deaths From the Covid vaccines are more than all other vaccines combined over the last 30 years of the Vaers system

Are you fucking serious?