Snoslinger

so when she tries it, and it's blocked by the repukes, what will you say then? i'll remember this.

for his big loss in november - "the entire system is rigged" it couldn't be his stupidity, diviseness, insults, inexperience, racism, bullying, comments towards women etc etc etc etc etc etc etc i guarantee alot of trumpsters will believe him too, starting with the dipshits in here.

because instead of keeping his mouth shut from the start, or saying he hasn't made the sacrifices the kahn family has made, he tries to equate his business dealings to "sacrifices". that's why george asked the question. this is huge problem for someone who isn't too far away from the potus. he gets mad, doesn't think about shit, and runs his trap, creating a fire storm. do you really want someone like this in the WH?

come on ya dipshit, post some links showing hillary doing some of the stuff mentioned in that post.

so the vfw, gold start families, and many, many others are taking all this shit out of context, and a few jackasses in freedom sledder know it

why do you dipshits keep bringing up "what has hillary or the clintons or anyone else sacrificed"? the kahns aren't criticizing everyone who hasn't made the ultimate sacrifice. they're criticizing him because of his negativity towards muslims, one of which was a US war hero. why in the hell can't your guy just stfu about shit like this and move on? like hillary did when trump marched up a mother of a dead bengazi member, which was, by far, alot more rude, crude and assholish than clinton having the kahns in her convention? then the dipshit tries to compare building buildings as a comparable sacrifice to gold star families? when are you going to wake the fuck up with this clown? if obama had done a fraction of this you'd all be apeshit.

her level of it, based on what we know thus far, no. because i know they all do it, but the repukes are interested in her only.

show me facts that prove hillary has done "all of it" racer. hell i'd even take a couple.

when they get convicted of something, that does happen occasionally, but not all.

back to the question - what would it even take? hillary slamming war heroes, gold star families, handicaps and anyone else who says something she doesn't like to hear, cozying up with a foreign nation to affect the election in her favor, personally offshoring US jobs while ridiculing and blaming others, hiring illegal immigrants and foreign workers to save a buck, stiffing workers, being a hot head and hated by foreign nationals, slamming NATO, not having a clue about foreign lands or policies..... if she had done even a fraction of these, i'd have jumped ship and condemned her a long time ago.

possibly. good luck finding a political system where everybody is 100% completely honest, all communications go thru secure servers, etc etc etc.

because the dipshit at the other end is a much bigger danger to the country. you cannot see that? if you had put a somewhat sane candidate in, you'd have this election quite easily.

would you like a rope, so i can pull you out of the same hole that racer, creepr, sludgey etc dwell in?

fact is alot of things happen in gov, in a moment's notice, and sometimes one has to go around the system to get something done when needed. but you douchebags just keep believing everything w/in gov is "packaged and delivered", 100% by the book, regardless of what is at stake. corporate americs is no different yet you expect our gov to get boggled down with all the red tape? i'd like to know more about these header removals, if they're true and if so, why it was done. regarding the libya thing - bfd. the american people need not every little detail about what our gov is doing and where. but the same douchebags that think otherwise, are the same douchebags who think hillary had all the power to do this stuff all on her own.

disliking hillary is one thing, and understandable. but to the extent you've gone, while promoting and defending trump at the same time?

what lefties have a problem with cover? it's obvious the point went over alot of heads, as usual. pssst - it's uptight conservatives that have the problem\

he was showing some promise awhile back, but apparently is now in the trump camp. wondering if his disdain for snowrider and maybe a few others is clouding his judgement.

sorry smales, not many of the lbs in here take you seriously any more. i took a look at your little rww hit piece, did some quick research, was going to respond and point out the "flaws" in it, but then decided not to as the rebuttal would have been a complete waste of time. if you truly are interested, take a look at who was responsible for approving the uranium thing. the deal had to go through a long list of approvals, including many republicans. but leave to you and some other buttheads to believe that all the repukes involved would have helped hillary, or avoided an opportunity to nail her at the time when are you dipshits going to learn you're being manipulated, just before an election? bengazi didn't work, mail-gate didn't work, foster gate didn't work...and the list goes on and on and on. crawl out of that stupid hole you fell in and come back to your senses.

didn't support didn't defend speculation smart man btw, trump is a culmination of all those traits and is running for potus. you listed people with one thar are not. lame, even using your standards.

creepr or racer genes likely.

what fucking lib has "done it" that i supported, you brain dead dipshit? what is with you clowns picking losers like romney and trump, two people that have taken major shits on the middle class and jobs, to run the country?

at least woolie was more entertaining and had a good sense of humor. this guy is a snooze.

the savior for the non-college folks is trump. between him personally offshoring jobs, hiring illegals, gaming the systems, lowering taxes on the wealthy, stating US wages are too high, etc etc etc it's just a matter of time until the middle class is "great again". you're that simple.

any president would have done and said the same things immediately following that attack, and would have had the same admiration. bfd. when i say "immediately" i'm talking about days afterwards, not the events leading up to the iraq war.