SnowRider

Yeah but they sit in the pew and love babies.....

What's fucked up are the new anti-choice laws from zealots like you. Abortion should be cheap, legal, and rare - and it is if women and men have birth control access and comprehensive sex education. Unfortunately the Bible thumping fucks oppose these things and want everyone to pray hormones and sex away. Fuck them.

Happy Holidays

I thought you were done responding to Slinger and I..... Poor Jimmy again.

Dummies support Dump/Russia/Putin 👍 Everyday that goes by it becomes increasingly clear the majority of voters were correct and Hillary was the best choice

How many years has that narrative been told? Start local and work your up the chain - until then - keep your nose to the grindstone and STFU

@motonoggin You know what's simple? Living in your world of idealism. You know what's difficult? Reality

Look at Dump's policies relative to the OP and ask yourself...more or less responsible and precise.... Hurry.....Dump enjoys you stroking him off

He's the most hypocritical dumb fuck on the site

But these same knuckledraggers want to pull their HC, carpet bomb brown people, ban refugees, eliminate nutrition and prenatal programs, etc - really care about fetuses/infants

Dude is a stooge - called his bluff

The reality is @f7ben and @motonoggin pouted on the sideline and have not offered any viable solutions. Do we stop? If so will there be an increase in civilian deaths and atrocities at the hands of those we are targeting? Careful measures were taken under Obama to minimize the casualties of civilians and those very measures that were increasingly effective are being rolled back by Dump. Unless you can offer viable solutions that reduce/eliminate casualties - not simply by walking away as there will be an increase from the hands of those we are targeting - then your complacency has led to an increase of civilian casualties which you seem consumed by while you pretend both sides are the same. You can bask on fantasy island and feel as though you have no culpability but the reality is,far different from your idealism. Moto=?7 Momo = Momo = Creeeper = Doe Dumber = Woolie = Snake etc - you are one in the same 👍

You've never voted for a D so remind the class about your nonpartisanship 👍

Reactions from the idealists has gone as expected. What you proclam to be important issues are now being handled in a more reckless manner. The reslity is it's a tough set of circumstances that was previously handled more responsibly and in line with your concerns. The current results illustrate causalities of civilians has increased while some of you proclaim there is no difference.

@bussman. Trolls the thread and tucks tail and runs Fake Outrage caught on FSCE

Nope and you're too stupid to comprehend the topic

The move also puts the spotlight back on Congress, where lawmakers in both parties have urged the administration to continue the payments to stabilize the Obamacare markets in the short term. While senior congressional Republicans oppose the payments themselves -- they sued the Obama administration to stop them and have tried for years to repeal the underlying law altogether -- there's recognition of what ending them suddenly could do to the millions of Americans insured through the Obamacare exchanges. Democrats have repeatedly pressed the administration for a longer term commitment that the payments would be made, but Trump has directed his advisers to keep them on a month-to-month basis, in part for negotiating leverage, according to sources with knowledge of the discussions. Nearly 6 million enrollees, or 57%, qualify for the cost-sharing payments this year, according to the most recent data from the Department of Health and Human Services. The subsidies are expected to cost the federal government about $7 billion in 2017. The uncertainty over the subsidies' fate was a key reason that many insurers are substantially hiking their rates for 2018 -- some by more than 20%. Several major carriers dropped out of the individual market, unwilling to wait and see what Trump and congressional Republicans would do. http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/12/politics/obamacare-subsidies/index.html @bussman Your stage to share your outrage......

@f7ben. @motonoggin I agree

The tugboat captain is easily triggered

What happens when your complacency elects Dump: Unfortunately, the increased trend of civilian casualties is unlikely to diminish. In fact, signs abound that the White House is developing a new set of policies and procedures that will authorize more sweeping discretion to the military. In September, The New York Times reported that White House officials were proposing two major rules changes. First, they would expand the scope of “kill missions” and allow for the targeting of lower-level terrorists in addition to high value targets. Second – and more notably—they would suspend high-level vetting of potential drone attacks and raids.

Ditto

The point - Reality. You're not real sharp: These changes represent a sharp about-face. The Obama administration carefully crafted a deliberate set of rules guiding the use of force. In 2013, Obama released the Presidential Policy Guidance for Approving Direct Action Against Terrorist Targets (PPG), which created specific rules for determining when the use of force against terrorists was legally justified. Then, in 2016, Obama issued an executive order on civilian harm that established heightened standards to minimize civilian casualties from military actions, and required the public release of information pertaining to strikes against terrorist targets. While the latest actions from the Trump administration stop short of reversing Obama-era restraints, they are unsettling steps in the opposite direction. For example, it appears for now that the White House will preserve the “near certainty” standard, which requires commanders to have near certainty that a potential strike will not impact civilians. But this could change over time. One senior official quoted in The New York Times article bluntly asserts that the latest changes are intended to make much of the “bureaucracy” created by the Obama administration rules “disappear.” As the White House dissolves the existing bureaucracy and relinquishes civilian oversight, Trump is embarking on a slippery slope that will potentially lead to major diminutions of civilian protection.

Reality as shown by the OP vs your idealistic hackery. Now more bombs are dropped and more families killed.....and you chose not to participate while basking on fantasy island.