Elkhorn

Who do you think is yelling?

What are you babbling about?

There's a lot of good questions and a lot of good answers and a lot of new info that probably everybody doesn't hear, I'm just tired of these stupid Democrats acting like little babies and being so partisan on camera

I can bet that Obama and the DOJ and probly most on the left are pissed that Comey laid out all the things they found she did wrong before he said they wouldn't pursue an indictment , he didn't have to do that, I think he did it on purpose. Especially when he said that no one knows what I'm about to say

Yes it is but they are saying they don't believe they can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, that's why they're not pursuing charges. I understand his explanation with the intent , I don't like it I'd rather see him bring charges but I understand more today from listening to him talk why they are not. But everything he keeps answering and expanding on from Tuesday, further hurts Hillary, and points even more to how incompetent and careless she was. He has reiterated she's done something wrong , today's hearings are providing more ad soundbites.

Some of this actually hurts Hillary even more LOL He basically said they could not prove intent because she was too stupid to understand some of the top-secret crap they were communicating back-and-forth

listening the hearing so far, they're not attacking comey , just asking questions and they're asking good questions and I think his explanation of how they reached the conclusion is a little better than Tuesday. his explanation on why they did not pursue gross negligence was good and I understand it a whole lot better, and as for the reason they weren't going to prosecute is because they cannot prove it beyond reasonable doubt, in other words they know that she did something wrong they just cannot prove it beyond a reasonable doubt . None of what he is saying today in front of Congress helps Hillary, it's still points to how incompetent and careless she was

Lol, you're proof you can't read or comprehend English.

The statute clearly lays out no intent is needed for gross negligence. Theres plehty of intent, she did all this on purpose, not by accident. She was not cleared of any wrong doing , she's just not being prosecuted for her wrong doing. when Trump wins, she'll be indicted

So you're ok with her getting away with it all? i hope the lay keep hammering get on it,

Sorry to hear, I couldn't begin to imagine going through that

Idk, he laid out sufficient evidence to at the very least put it in front of a grand jury.

Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information. For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails). None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail. Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

Intent doesn't matter with gross negligence.... Extremely careless ...

Hillary said TPP was the gold standard......

Wrong

Like I said the FBI didn't clear her of any wrongdoing, in fact they pointed out everything she did wrong, they are just declining to prosecute or recommend prosecution. Now it's up the Trump and the Republican Party to make this a campaign issue and prosecutor in the public eye, jury decides in November. The case for her incompetence and lack of judgment is all right there in black and white with the FBI's statement today, he didn't have to come out and lay out all the things that she did wrong and what they found , he could have come out and in 2 minutes said we have not found enough to recommend prosecution to the department of justice and it would've been done and over with

She wasn't cleared of any wrong doing if Trump wins this fall, a hundred bucks says his department of justice files charges against all the points lead out today by director Comey

Let's not forget there still a criminal investigation into the Clinton foundation

99% of his entire statement hurts her. I'd be running ads with Comey soundbites from now until November You never said that she didn't do anything wrong he just said they wouldn't recommend charges

"She was extremely careless and a person in her position should've known better"

There's still another investigation ongoing...I said along time ago the Clinton foundation pay for play would get her. That said, take out the line of coney not recommending charges, everything he said was pretty damning , great ad material as well

What a joke, he flat out said she sent and received top secret info on a private server he said those emails had no place on a server set up like hers 7 email chains top secret, SAP, he even said it was criminal

Given his tone and what he's saying ... It's not sounding too good...

They STILL call it a review voluntary "Secretary Clinton gave a voluntary interview this morning about her email arrangements while she was Secretary,” spokesman Nick Merrill said. “She is pleased to have had the opportunity to assist the Department of Justice in bringing this review to a conclusion. Out of respect for the investigative process, she will not comment further on her interview.”