Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

BOHICA

Gold Member
  • Posts

    13,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by BOHICA

  1. 1 hour ago, racinfarmer said:

    I can't wait for some of the FMCSA  is "considering" for the trucking industry.  

    We'll need more trucks on the highway to move the same amount of product.  

    Brilliant.  

    Not sure what regs you may be referring of but if it is keeping them out of the left lane I’m all for it.  Should be a $10,000 park it until it’s paid ticket for left lane use

  2. 4 minutes ago, Voodoo said:

    Absolutely.

    It's been a pet peeve of Alberta's for many years.

    Up here the phrase is access to tide water, and BC and many native activist have fought it tooth and nail, mostly on the false narrative that it will somehow increase climate change. It will not. 

    It makes no financial sense to send crude that far by rail or truck, but a pipeline changes the equation.

    Now, if we can get a pipeline of natural gas to the coast, that would help the climate.

    No one is in a rush to make that happen unfortunately.

     

     

    Our keystone pipeline in the US may just have to reverse flow from the Gulf of Mexico just to feed the upper Great Plains and Mid West refineries as Canada sends it oil global.  Would put a strain on prices as well down south in Texas and the Gulf of Mexico region if the upper middle of the country doesn’t have enough oil to keep its refineries going.  I think the days of cheaper oil and prices in the middle of the country compared to the coast regions will shrink due to Canada’s building of that pipeline.

  3. Just now, Voodoo said:

    It's a global commodity, and heavily taxed and regulated. 

    Government is the problem on much of the  cost, not necessarily the industry.

    Don't get me wrong, the oil producers aren't mother Teresa,  but if government would butt the fuck out it would absolutely be cheaper.

    This was the article I was reading on Canada oil producers.  They have only had one market and one place for their oil to go.  Canadian crude prices went up on the news that they are filling the TMX soon.  Canada will finally be able to become a player in the global market.

     

    its why you are seeing comments above with people are saying they are seeing 40-50 cent increases in a week.  Increase in pipeline capacity in Canada is why prices are currently going up.


     

    https://www.overdriveonline.com/business/article/15663608/us-diesel-to-rise-on-canadas-trans-mountain-pipeline-expansion

    Truckers' days of finding relatively cheap diesel fuel in the Midwest may be numbered, as a $22 billion "catastrophic boondoggle" of a pipeline expansion north of the border threatens to end the U.S. stranglehold on cheap crude oil from the Canadian province of Alberta.

    The inland province produces a lot of heavy crude, the kind that's used to make diesel fuel. Since the 1950s, the Trans Mountain pipeline has shipped that south. Over the last few decades, the U.S. has become increasingly reliant on Canadian crude exports from the pipeline.

     

    "Currently, nearly all the oil produced in Western Canada goes to one market, the United States Midwest," the Trans Mountain website reads. "However, there’s a limit to how much oil this market needs. For much of the last decade, Canada has been selling into the United States at a discount to the world price for similar oil products."

    This discount reaches as much as 23 cents/gal. in the Great Lakes and 41 cents/gal. in the Great Plains region, according to  Tracy Shuchart, global energy and materials strategist at Hedge Fund Telemetry Geopolitics. Any big boost in U.S. diesel prices across the country's midsection could be especially painful. Typically, the Midwest represents one of the cheaper diesel markets, often bested only by the Gulf Coast region in the Energy Information Administration's weekly oil and fuel price reports

     

     

  4. That big Canadian pipeline to the west coast is going to raise fuel prices for the US and Canada as US refineries use to be able to get Canadian crude at a discount cause it had no where to go but US.  Now Canada oil producers can send it to China and other global markets that will pay more for it.  Article I was reading on it was very interesting and expansion of pipelines don’t always lead to decrease in prices

  5. 12 minutes ago, racer254 said:

    I agree, but thats not cheating.  

    Depends on honesty of how much is claimed as business and pleasure as only the business part is deductible.  Combining pleasure and not claiming that is a cheat which is the type of stuff that hopefully the IRS is finding and catching.  Trump pays almost nothing in taxes based on his return.

     

    FYI I’m all for Trump paying zero but I think everybody should have the same abilities in the tax code as business do

  6. 5 hours ago, racer254 said:

    Please someone give one example of these wealthy tax cheats.  Just one. 

    Turning 12.6 billion for 500 million collected is exactly why it would be easier just to make the tax codes simpler.  But the government knows it has just another reason to spend money.

    https://www.jet-bed.com/are-private-jets-tax-deductible/#:~:text=Under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act%2C private jet owners,complexities of 100 percent expensing.

  7. 12 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

    Derp.  

    $7500 off covered by the government is paying.  

    Let me guess….  You are “against” IRS collecting $560 billion from wealthy tax cheats and having IRS a bunch agents to make sure people pay their taxes.

  8. 1 hour ago, Skidooski said:

    They are desperate for people to buy EV's so they pay people to buy them  

    How are “they” “paying” people to buy them?  I think ultimately you mean people get to keep more of their own if they buy certain ones.

  9. 2 hours ago, racer254 said:

    Rooting for the IRS?  Gotta be some kind of commie.

    Many here root for/against people getting to keep more of their own tax dollars…. Lots and lots of republicans don’t like some keeping more of their own tax dollars and would rather the IRS keep more of peoples money.

  10. 9 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

    With the US currently looking extremely weak I can agree with that. 

    I don’t think we necessarily look weak….  More like stupid.

     

    According to a report by the Washington-headquartered Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, of the 46 active conflicts around the world, the US provided arms to one or more parties for 34 of them. That was almost three out of four conflicts!

    Now, if we pair all that with the anti-China narrative from Washington, you would have to conclude that Beijing is spreading authoritarianism through producing goods and building infrastructure while America is promoting freedom and democracy by bombing and selling weapons around the world.

     

    • Like 1
  11. 9 minutes ago, akvanden said:

    Historians will look back on this WW and will be remembered fondly of the WW with only three US casualties. 

    See….  already forgot the couple of navy seals lost?

  12. 3 minutes ago, akvanden said:

    All that naïveté seems to have served well so far. :bc:
     

    Well I hope they’re deadly, usually works as a better deterrent that way. 
     

    Let us know when China enters, then a WW might happen. Otherwise there’s no one we can’t utterly destroy in the Middle East if needed.

    China smart in this WW…. Staying pretty neutral and selling to both sides.  Globally they are likely more licked the the US is globally

  13. 46 minutes ago, EvilBird said:

    I understand humvees and certain equipment sure but 70 Aircraft also?  Seems crazy. 

    Not to mention the informants and allies that we left for slaughter. 

    disgraceful pullout imo. 

    I would be really suprised if they have the capability to get any of our military hardware air borne and keep it airborne.  And honestly I don’t see the pullout as a disgrace cause Trump laid the groundwork and is the pres that got us out of there.  Biden gets no credit for getting us out of wars and is doing his best to get us in more.

    • Like 1
  14. 5 minutes ago, akvanden said:

    Sure, the current admin is to blame for Putin’s miscalculations , Israel’s security failure on Oct 7th, Iran who’s been meddling in the Middle East long before, bombs are bad now but not in previous administration, etc. 

    Again, WW3 was supposed to start nearly two years ago. Wrong then wrong now.

     

    ps - more US servicemen died under the previous administration than current. 

    We are in the beginnings of a WW.  You see all the bombing we have been doing.  Us weapons have likely the highest kill count of anybody in world. 

  15. 10 minutes ago, akvanden said:

    If I remember correctly, we were being told WW3 was going to happen in summer of ‘22 by some of the same people. I must have missed that version of it. 

    Let see…. Ukraine, Israel, Iran, Russia, the Red Sea, troops dying, relentless bombings by US, and invasion into the US…..  we are just in the beginnings of one that The Biden admin has been ramping up.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...