Carlos Danger

7 hours ago, Mainecat said:

Do you believe the Bush foundation got the same donations?

3 billion in total? No I do not think Bush got the same donations.

The Clinton's never did get the traction they were looking out of that story. 

50 minutes ago, Ebsell said:

That is just plain hurtful. I have an illness.

2 hours ago, Ez ryder said:

is a soft Weiner fine in a sap chat  

You never take pics at half mast!!! That could ruin a guys reputation.

Soft racism is just fine as long as you are a Dem.

1 hour ago, Ez ryder said:

and no snap chats

They took my phone so I am going to have to go old school and just show San Diego the goods the old fashion way.

Mr Motonoggin stares at Mainecat.

I went horse back riding at sex camp today.

4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

get over it, the clinton campaign isn't the only one who's collected bucks from foreign backers.

it is the scale that should give you pause. She has out raised him 2 to 1 and nearly 3 to 1 in soft pac money.  http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/graphics/2016-presidential-campaign-fundraising/

Hillary Clinton

TOTAL CASH ON HAND

$171.6M

Candidate Raised to Date* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $866.6M

Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $713.0M

Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $153.6M

Super-PACs Raised to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $201.5M

Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $184.7M

Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $18.0M

Total Raised to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,068.1M

Total Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $897.7M

Total Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $171.6M

Donald Trump

TOTAL CASH ON HAND

$83.9M

Candidate Raised to Date* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $453.1M

Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $385.2M

Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $67.9M

Super-PACs Raised to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $59.1M

Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $44.3M

Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $16.0M

Total Raised to Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $512.2M

Total Spent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $429.5M

Total Cash on Hand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $83.9M

9 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

as usual, this little story is just that, a story. there is a "connection" between trump, guilianni, and somein the new york branch of the fbi., many of who have hard-ons for hillary. it's all making sense now. the "re-open" of the investigation last week, these leaks coming from "someone who knows someone". guilanni recently saying they have something up their sleeve, the former head of the fbi calling the clintons a crime family etc etc etc. there aren't any indictments around the corner, it's all BS. look at all the facts and connect the dots. but then again, this is over most of your heads, especially sludgey's.

Did you even read the Podesta e-mail put up by Mr Motonoggin?  So a group is conspiring to circumvent the campaign finance  laws of this country and your answer is nothing to see here?  I believe this is the kind of thing Rico statutes were put on the books for.

2 minutes ago, f7ben said:

Oh I agree ...I wish it would have all just been dumped and it could have been sifted through and sorted out.....but its clear Assange has an agenda. I dont know what it is but I'm guessing he is thinking a little bigger than just handing a presidency to Trump

Trump is just a Canary in a coal mine. For years the media has subverted their duties and it leads to the rise of corruption and the thinning of good qualified people willing to run for office on just about every level. I am going to vote for Trump. He may not be a great president or even a good one but he will at a minimum get the press doing their job again plus I figure it is the only way I will be alive to see Christmas.

5 minutes ago, f7ben said:

I dont think assange wants to hand the election to the buffoon trump either.....I wonder if he waits and she gets indicted after the election and the whole shit gets thrown into a tailspin.....that seems more his style

Assange is doing what our media should be doing which is reporting what he has found no matter which side it helps or hurts.  The media should not be making the call on who gets in office that is the job of the voter. And I hope that if Trump does get into office and Assange finds an e-mail of this type he will print it just like a reporter should.

4 minutes ago, f7ben said:

sounds like phase 3 of the wikileaks dump will contain emails directly from Hillary......and a lot of them

It must be a tough call for Assange.  Do you dump the Hillary e-mail on Friday giving her surrogates the whole weekend to go on TV and spin or do you wait till Monday and take a chance that there is not enough time left to influence and educate voters. 

I have been back reading some of his posts.  I think he is being sedated and is resting comfortably under proper care for a few more days.

2 hours ago, motonoggin said:

If you picked a busy City street and started showing people a picture of her how long do you think it would take before you got someone who knew who she was?

Just now, Sal Rosenberg said:

 

Slinger turned that off after 10 seconds .

Uygur is Democrat in good standing.  He was pimping for Sanders and warning His fellow Democrats as to the dangers of picking Hillary.

Maybe you guys need a friendly face to lay it out.

2 hours ago, old indy said:

Maybe its just too hot to handle.  trying to let it go like it didnt happen. ?  but YEAH     WOW ..   if true and things are SO damaging what are they waiting for?

Grand jury might have something to do with it.

5 hours ago, oquossocbob said:

President Trump's DOJ will indict. But that will never happen because Obama will pardon her the day before he leaves office.

Pardon for what? she has not been charged with a crime yet. And even if she does end up facing charges it will be years down the road.  I think President Trump like president Ford would Pardon Clinton as long as she and Bill stayed off the speech circuit and out of politics at any level.

5 hours ago, ArcticCrusher said:

"The justice department will stop it from going to trial."

 

Where is the indictment?  

One of the original goals of the Lynch lead department of Justice was to keep the evidence out of the hands of a special prosecutor and more importantly the eyes of a grand jury.  But due to some very nice cellphone pics of a hunk of a man and his flock of young hot female admirers a grand jury is going to see the Clinton e-mails.  

No matter what you guys hear it was not an accident.

I guarantee Michelle did not delete the pics I sent her.

Just now, Momorider said:

Snot is unquestionably a complete fucking moron of the highest order  

Hey hey don't be a hater.  I got into office because of fine men and women just like him. Useful idiots are like a warm blanket to Dem hack like myself.

You guys have no idea what it is like being the only Jew in the room at one of her family get togethers. 

3 hours ago, Snoslinger said:

um no. the Clintons made their money giving speeches and writing books, like most other former politicians. including your hero bush, although I can't figure out who'd want to listen to him really. you maybe?

Wow this is a great web site. It has people who still believe that the Clinton's got all that money for making speeches.