Rod

The left despised Graham because he was a murderous Warhawk 

now they suck his balls dry because he’s a murderous Warhawk 

Collusion was a scam 

I know David silveria isn’t necessarily the greatest but man I loved his early stuff. 

On 3/31/2024 at 6:42 PM, Mainecat said:

NO POLITICS PLEASE!

Here’s  mine….65 GTO 

 

Absolutely. 60s Pontiac’s are just beautiful cars 

Man this shit is whack 

6 minutes ago, SnowRider said:

What’s the basis for your Repug party wanting the book taught in school?  Your Repug’s effort to bring ‘God’ back into the classroom?  Being the good and faithful Repug that you are - you surely have an explanation ….

You need Jesus 

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

We don’t know who wrote the gospels either.  

Christianity is full of unknowns and unprovables.

Neal

Well back then literacy was a very rare commodity 

that’s why the Catholics\romans got away with what they did for so long 

Jesus teachings were profound in the sense that religion shouldn’t be government 

he taught that you didn’t really need a church, and that people can be directly connected to God

This was a wild idea because back then religion and government was the same thing. You couldn’t get salvation unless the church\state approved you and that’s how they controlled people. 
 

so Jesus basically was turning society on its head. So they had to kill him 

4 hours ago, Deephaven said:

The Bible is a collection of stories from a multitude of religions.  It is not some book Jesus wrote or had even hardly any influence on.  Many of the stories that include him as a character had nothing to do with his life but someone else.  The history of the book is actually much more interesting than the contents.  

You are right about one thing though.  The Catholics perverted the shit out of it.  Of course Luther took some liberties as well, but regardless calling the Bible some historical record of Christianity is a misnomer. 

 

Literally nobody said that Jesus wrote the bible. 

This is kinda wild. Jesus existed. Basically a historical fact. Yet anti science nurds are upset. Why?

16 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Prove it!

See the  OP

8 minutes ago, Kivalo said:

Of course he existed. How else did he write the bibe....wait what?

The Catholics\romans actually put the bible together 

although they perverted it really bad and it wasn’t until Luther translated it that we got the context of what Jesus really said and meant 

34 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

No I said you can't prove he existed, let alone that he was a supernatural being (as the Bible describes).

People have no problem agreeing that a Jewish religious teacher named Yeshua existed (as there were many Jewish teachers around at that time), even if it cannot be proven.  The issue comes when any type of supernatural power, or deity claim is applied Jesus.

Neal

I ever said he was a supernatural being 

but most historians agree that he at least existed as a man 

10 minutes ago, ZR6000RR said:

Most? About as accurate as climate change. Adjust on the fly.

Everyone thought that pontius pilot didn’t exist. Until it turned out that he did 

7 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

It's not a straw man argument.  You cannot prove the man existed.  That deals exactly with the "Did Jesus Exist" proposition.

You are using a fallacy argument incorrectly. 

Neal

You said I can’t prove that he was a deity. I certainly can’t. Nor was that an argument that I made

i said Jesus existed. Which most historians agree that he did. And he changed the world, even if he was just a man. 

7 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

You can't prove he did, let alone that he was a supernatural being. 

Neal

Neat strawman argument 

1 minute ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

BCE and CE are religiously neutral, yet they describe the same years as AD and BC.

Neal

And what’s it based around 

1 minute ago, ZR6000RR said:

Stupid, people believe there was life after death. 

Literally off topic 

the topic was did Jesus exist? Yes he did 

Just now, ZR6000RR said:

Jesus was created to make people believe that their was life after death,  making I'd buy idiots die in war.

Try that again but in English 

7 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

You haven't presented any yet hey bob.

Neal

Just now, NaturallyAspirated said:

No, it isn't.  No he didn't.   

Neal

You know that you being mad doesn’t change facts hey 

2 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

The Egyptians and the Romans had our calendar basically figured out well before Jesus was born.

Our government has little to nothing to do with Jesus.  Again Rome had a "republic" and democratic systems well before Jesus.

Neal

Our calendar is based of Jesus life and death, and Jesus started the separation of church and state 

6 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:

A person, or even an amalgamation of people existing with similar life of Jesus of the bible is believable.  I would say that there is some fantasy and highly suspect events and descriptions in the Bible of Jesus though. 

Neal

 

Our calendar and even our government structure is based off Jesus and what he stood for 

Interesting topic for Easter 

Jesus got crucified