NaturallyAspirated

1 minute ago, motonoggin said:

This is typical liberal 'both side-ism'. 

White folks think racism is saying mean things about white folks. It's not. 

 

Perhaps we disagree on how the term racism or racist is used.  Do you agree that the standard definition of the term:

prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

is incorrect?

Neal

1 minute ago, motonoggin said:

Lol. You can't be racist against white people. 

Silly liberal.

More erroneous bullshit that further makes claims you present dubious.  You are being intellectually dishonest. 

Neal

9 hours ago, motonoggin said:

Neal

2 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

Unless all these white guys weren't brought up white, then it's just the truth. 

I know white men love to think that they're inherently impartial and objective, but it's clearly not the case. 

No, it's a biased judgement from you based on skin color.

So says you. You are not correct however, as you provide example of racist thinking your judgment is dubious, and should not be believed.

Neal

Just now, motonoggin said:

No it isn't. It might be prejudice. 

But more than likely it's just the truth. 

You are making an unsubstantiated claim based solely on skin color.  Racism. Not prejudice, not perhaps truth, racism.

Neal

9 hours ago, BOHICA said:

So I am 600 miles from home and this morning my Fridge sent a notification to my phone that it needs the water filter changed....  Pretty cool with all the the technology.that is out there

So far connected in my house is the climate controls, fridge, garage doors, Vacuum cleaner and the Television.  Ive been think I need to start transition the home to smart bulbs but the prices are  still pretty spendy on those.    What do you guys have connected at your homes?

Phillips hue bulbs, some GE Zwave switches, Nest thermostat, Amazon Alexa, all the kids connected devices run through Disney Circle on our router, have some Zwave outlets to shut off TV and Xbox in the kids rooms.

Coming soon will be the outside stove so I can monitor corn/pellet level, supply/return temp, btu, ect.

I also have lots of automation connected through my IFTT account, it automates lights when I leave or return home, connects devices to WiFi if they have been turned off when I get home, texts me alarms set on Alexa, ect.

Neal

17 minutes ago, DriftBusta said:

And that nerd pseudo intellect with bad glasses wannabe is somehow credible, says you?  What is it with you guys and all your catchy terms and acronyms?  Red Pill?  Cucks?  Try not to get wrapped up too much in YOUR own narratives Dan-o.  

Cuck is an alt right creation, not left.

Neal

9 hours ago, motonoggin said:

Fuckin dude is a crackpot.

 

Wow, he nailed Paul to the wall.

Neal

7 hours ago, motonoggin said:

Neal would never make such a bold and truthful statement

It isn't a truthful statement.  To say they can't is racism.

Neal

7 hours ago, Rod Johnson said:

You are implying that these people may not be able to do their jobs because they're white...

I've already posted the answer.  Learn to read for fucks sake.

Neal

2 hours ago, Rod Johnson said:

Are you implying that these white guys can't do their job because of their race?

Are you implying that you can't read worth a fuck?

Neal

Sorry for the low blow Joelle...
 

Neal

1 hour ago, f7ben said:

I like to piss on frogs !!!!!!!1

Jasmean!  

Neal

This forum needs a wives and girlfriends thread to spice up the joint!

Neal

2 minutes ago, motonoggin said:

No because the world is flat

After laughing at JT I did some FE research, and they do offer an inciting theory for the extinction of the dinos...

Neal

Just now, Rod Johnson said:

Does it change per hemisphere 

No, only under a monarchy.

Neal

4 minutes ago, Rod Johnson said:

So does lug height affect final drive ratio?

Only in Canada, because it's metric.

Neal

2 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Fluctuations during 1 complete cycle are surely present.  They are present regardless of the height of the lug.  The premise is simple.  Try not to overthink it.  

One revolution of the driven clutch.  Which sled moves further?  The sled with a 3" track or the sled with no lugs on the track. 

Ok, we agree on sentence one, and also on sentence two.  

However, sentence two can also be rewritten such that fluctuations are present regardless of the height of the lug, yet the lug height can also introduce fluctuations.

I do understand the simple, and also the more complex premise going on in the discussion.

Under normal real world conditions we would say that the sleds move the same (and I agree with and am happy stating that this is the case we all should go by), in theory they could move slightly different lengths, which is nearly impossible to measure, nor do we care because the results between the two balance out over time if we were to keep constantly measuring.

The lug flick is one of the fluctuations that happens during the cycle as you mentioned.  It isn't anything more complicated than that.  Changing lug height can change those fluctuations (which are changes in the FDR).  It's that simple.

Neal

Just now, f7ben said:

I do not generally agree with that being allowed in the simple definition of final drive ratio 

That's fine, however there is a problem then when things don't complete a full revolution or cycle then.  

A theoretical description can (and in this case clearly is) different from the general real world description.

Neal

3 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Net Sum ZERO.  Simple as that. 

It isn't, and repeating the phrase over and over again isn't going to change it, nor is it a good debate tactic.

Lets try this, do you agree that the ratio can change over time, vary within a full cycle, but that variance equals exactly the general calculated rate for exactly one cycle?

Neal

Just now, AKIQPilot said:

The original question, from the very first post was "all other things equal"  All things equal means exactly that.  All things equal except lug height.  

Try to wrap your head around that Neal. 

Again, then it becomes and absurd question.  Can you change an unchangeable.

Neal

Just now, AKIQPilot said:

The front lugs flick in the opposite direction as the rear they would offset any effect the rear might have.  

Net Sum ZERO.  Simple as that.  

Incorrect, they sweep in the same direction, you are 100% incorrect in that assessment.

Sure, over any time that can be the case, it can also be that when measured at non-peak of the wave times the ratio is not equal.  This is the part that you seem to be failing to understand.

Neal

1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said:

Because it has no effect.  If it did it could be proven with a formula.  

You have failed again at this simple exercise.  

I gave you a formula long ago, you choose to ignore it.

Not at all, it still stands.

Neal

Just now, AKIQPilot said:

Dude.  Those changes are the same with both sleds.  They have no bearing on the question.  "all other things being equal"  

You're grasping.  

And the all other things being equal was also conceded early in the original discussion.  It was agreed that shaft twist, chain stretch, ect. was not part of the "all other things being equal".   Otherwise we would end up in a situation where the argument was in essence can an unchangeable FDR be changed, obviously and absurd query.

Neal

1 minute ago, AKIQPilot said:

And even if he could prove that the lug at the rear of the track made a difference that change is overcome by the lug in the front of the track doing the same work in the opposite direction.  

His claim is the rear lug is propelling the entire mas forward more than the other lugs touching the ground.  Well the front lug has the exact opposite affect as the rear so the lugs offset one another.  

Actually no, the two lugs combine, their force is rebound in the gab between, when no sweeping lugs are in contact with the ground, either in front or back.

Neal