Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

jtssrx

Members
  • Posts

    15,705
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by jtssrx

  1. 40 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

    Bullshit.  I've supported none of it.  You can only see black and white and search like hell for a conspiracy to support your color.  When you post ridiculousness I comment.  Goes for everyone unless someone beats me to it.

    You support all of it including masks snd vaccines 

  2. 53 minutes ago, Deephaven said:

    I rip bullshit on both sides.  You are regularly bat shit crazy in your conclusions along with the other conspiracidiots so I call you out.  Unlike either extreme I see things with logic.

    You’ve supported all this Covid nonsense. Many of us have said from day one that all of this was BS and you called us conspiracy theorists 

    • Like 2
  3. On 2/5/2022 at 9:17 AM, Deephaven said:

    I have zero interest in supporting lockdowns, but that is not a John Hopkins study or paper but a group of three economists interested in bashing what has happened.  Everyone should understand that as they read the headline that is a misnomer and taken out of context.  It is a title and media representation that is equally off as saying that lack of lckdowns would have killed 100+ million people.  Both filled with intentionally poor data collection to try to make a point.  Again, it is disgusting how all the lockdowns happened but the paper above is far from the gospel.

    You’ve supported all the Covid nonsense for two years now you’re trying to claim you don’t but in the sane breath you’re ripping the story and the paper. 

  4. On 2/5/2022 at 9:30 AM, Cold War said:

    How is it taken out of context?  
    Where is your proof that lockdowns did anything but destroy the economy?  
    The point is people were punished for any opposition to lockdowns and there is zero proof they did anything but hurt people.  Should those responsible not be held responsible?   

    It’s taken out of context because it complete Contradicts everything he’s pushed and supported 

  5. 1 hour ago, Mainecat said:

    I’m gonna go out on a limb here and guess it’s a far right conspiracy site?

     

    1 hour ago, spin_dry said:

    I don’t know if it was intended as such, but it’s basically a right wing echo chamber. GOP circle jerk. 

    It's a video platform like youtube without the censorship. Spin_dry's GOP circle jerk comment is a typical comment of a leftist pussy who doesn't like freedom 

    • Thanks 2
  6. 1 hour ago, motonoggin said:

    Lol. What's "pure capitalism"?

    A lot of people doing the same thing here, bud, except it's for bloodsucking capitalists.

    A system that doesn't have government intervention in it. If a company is going to to fail let it fail. no bailouts. The other problem is our government currently picks winners and losers. Government should have zero involvement in company's outside of making sure they aren't hurting employees or polluting the environment. The consumer is what should dictate weather a is viable 

  7. 11 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

    Then you have this dopey fuck on with Sloppy Steve…🤣🤣

     

     

    Says the guy that doesn’t understand the constitution has a provision that allows the VP to reject the vote outcome  if there is an issue with the vote

  8. 8 hours ago, Jimmy Snacks said:

    So if someone is a “rat” they are telling the truth and apparently this bag ‘o shit is upset about that.🤣🤣🤣

     

     

    You clearly don’t understand the constitution. Pence could’ve sent the election back to the state legislatures. It’s an actual provision in the constitution. 

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...