Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Snoslinger

USA Contributing Member
  • Posts

    26,836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Snoslinger

  1. nah, there's no manipulation amongst faux news viewers. they've always like people who slam war heroes, slam admirals, slam generals, make fum of the disabled, cuddle up with putin, tell the country our wages are too high, etc etc etc. do you clowns think anyone takes you seriously? if a dem had done a FRACTION of this behavior there'd be no defense, nor support, from any of the left in here. now go ahead and bring up some lame and fictional story about hillary to try and make the comps. :handjob:

    • Like 1
  2. 19 minutes ago, Edmo said:

    Some of you need to realize the same old crap isn't going to cut it anymore. People are looking for something different. If you think most of the Bernie folks are going to vote for Hillary you're delusional. It isn't going to happen. She represents everything x1000 most folks want to change.

    :lol: i think i know who's delusional here. i'm curious though, what % do you think will vote for hillary? i'm thinking 90-95%. again, because you managed to put a donald trump up for election.

  3. 28 minutes ago, Edmo said:

    SR keeps flapping his lips about unity. Doesn't look like that to me. I don't care who else has done this. We're talking about 2016 and what's going on now. Why is that always your excuse? This doesn't look good for Hillary. Why keep deflecting?

    we're talking about a small amount of people here. there is actually alot more disunity w/in the rnc than the dnc. this is common, and i guarantee you the vast majority of bernie supporters will vote hillary. your party f'ed up big time this election. hillary could have beeb defeated quite easily if you had a decent candidate. but instead you end up with trump. i'd be really pissed at the tea party jackasses that hijacked the gop and made it the joke it is today.

    one other thing. why is it with nearly every thing obama and the dems have done over the years to try and improve things, did you and others cheer against it and support the "party of no"? now here you are complaining about things that haven't changed. do you have selectve memories?

  4. Donald Trump is suddenly distancing himself from last week's Republican National Convention, after television ratings show that the Democratic National Convention consistently pulled in more viewers across the country for three consecutive nights.

    "I didn't produce our show," Trump told the New York Times. "I just showed up for the final speech."

    While the ratings for the fourth night have yet to be announced, Trump did appear anxious that Clinton's final convention night on Thursday would top his own. Earlier that morning, the Republican nominee sent a campaign letter to his supporters urging them not to tune in.

    The ratings loss is likely to be a particularly sensitive topic for Trump. The reality star has long boasted of being a ratings bonanza, with viewers flocking to witness his unpredictable, inflammatory performances throughout the primary debate season. Trump's presence in the debates created record-breaking numbers for television networks.

    Read more: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/07/donald-trump-republican-national-convention-poor-ratings
     
     

     

     

  5. 17 minutes ago, GGNHL said:

    Yeah, at a still target I'm sure many gun owners can, but not a target that was running away and gaining yards every second when you're already full of adrenaline. :lol:

    yet they can take more precise shots elsewhere. got it. save it, the incidents i was referring to did not warrant death shots. particularly the walter scott incident, which i believe is the one that brought this into discussion.

  6. 1 minute ago, GGNHL said:

    I was trying to give you some credit, but you showed you were absolutely clueless on firearms. You came off sounding exactly like some fat teen Call of Duty player spewing off what he knew about video game weapons while never firing one in real life. :lol:

    i'm not an ace by any means, but i guarantee i could hit the general knee area, for sure below the waist, of a target at 30 - 50 feet. if a cop can't do that, he probably shouldn't be in the force. again, you have no trouble justifying or believing head/chest shots at the same distances, yet you can't grasp a "knee shot"?

  7. Just now, Snake said:

    So you agree with her that government is about free shit, not what you feel inside?

    wtf? you OK dude? you're acting a bit strange recently. i agreed with the statement you quoted, nothing to do with "free shit".

  8. 1 minute ago, GGNHL said:

    You're lucky there is no proof, because you said hitting a guy running away in the knee at 30 or 50 feet would be easy and everyone on the board told you that is an extremely difficult shot, especially compared to center mass while you kept spouting the same flawed logic. But just like Rob calling out Momo for his dupes, it's been lost to internet history. :bc:

    see, already it's dropped to 30 or 50 feet, instead of 100. :lol:

×
×
  • Create New...