Jump to content

BOHICA

Members

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by BOHICA

    6 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

    You are a moron... Holy shit. First you start out this thread talking about being a climate denier and follow it up with being so fucking retarded about demand based resource valuation that it hurts. But if you throw enough emojis out there you think you can look smart and make it seem like you are anything but a braindead, crayon eating, retard. https://afghanistan.cr.usgs.gov/minerals

    Your absolute inability to understand anything relating this topic is all anyone with a brain needs to know. Tell us how 9/11 was an inside job to get minerals though... Sounds legit. 

     

     

    Quote my climate change dening post snolettucerider580.  Then we can move on to the rest of your post.

    USGS discovered Afganistan Mineral wealth....  :lol:

    Your insults resemble snowrider type insults which means you are lost and furiously googling

    geologist had plugged and pulled samples from that region for decades.  We went to afgan of course for the terrorism fight but we are not still there to fight terrorism.  Right now the US couldnt build or launch a satelitte without china's minerals.  We are there to keep others out of afganistan.  we leave guess who will be in there exploiting its minerals....  we will be a force in afganistan under the guise of terrorism for many years to come.

    3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

    So? We import 15 Trillion cubic feet of natural gas of the 27T cu ft we use. 30% of all oil imported is not being used for transportation, which is still a little bit over a Billion barrels of oil a year ($43B spent as of right now). It is not a question of can we build enough tomorrow, it is a question can we raise net exports by gradually weaning off of imported hydrocarbons. The answer is yes. We drill our own, increase our alt-energy grid, and prevent us from having to give two fucks about the ME. Your answer on the topic is very uneducated. It is not about throwing up a million panels and saying game over ME, suck one we don't need your oil... 

    Afganistan....  full of rare earth elements needed to construct solar panels, wind turbine, electric motors and batteries.  We will be there for a very long time....  why cause we dont and wont level the rocky mountains to get those things and we dont want to be 100% dependent on china.   Last mine in the US in those rare earth elements needed for anything electric green energy closed up shop and went defunct....  why cause it was in california.  We will fight wars like we are currently doing to secure green energy.  Afganistan isnt about oil, terrorism, or helping brown people....  it is about green energy

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    5 minutes ago, 02sled said:

    Cream of society... nobody mentions how the dog is. I'm more concerned for the officers and the dog than I ever would be for that low life.... but wait for it. Friends and family will come out crying for justice saying he was a good man and just misunderstood.

    Jardo went for a walk after surgery.  Resting up and doing well according to his facebook page.

    https://www.facebook.com/Boise-Police-K9-433851893344262/

    • Like 1

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    I kind of see things this way...  I would guess the guys that bitch about people wanting to run a muffler on a gun are the same guys that bitch about the guy not running mufflers on snowmobiles, harleys, or any vehicle.  When it comes to guns many people have backassward thinking.  Why not make more quiet???  No logical arguement has ever been made against running a supressor.

    Suppressors have been found to increase accuracy as well as slight velocity for many.  Recoil and muzzle flip is reduced.  Also suppressors typically lower decibels by 20-30.  So you can lower osha impact noise levels below osha maxium threshold...  then ear plugs on top of a suppressor would be a more fun enjoyable shoot for everyone.  Was at my indoor range the other day and i started touching off the ar 15 on a 7 lane range.  A father with his kids was there shooting 22's.  Hearing protected of course.  The ar was to much for those kids as even with hearing protection it still hurt their ears.  150-160 db gun can be silenced down say 25 db with a suppressor and another 29 db with foam plugs those kids time at the range wouldnt have been ruined by something as small as a 5.56.

    i would suppress my guns but not for the cost and hassle it is currently.

    i stack ear protection by the way so the noise doesnt bother me.

    trump will change these gun laws though and the supreme court will uphold trumps new gun control laws for many decades to come.

    What Sanders did was fracture the democratic party and push his agenda farther away from being a reality.  If he wouldn't have ran Clinton would have won.  What Sanders did was disenfranchise many in the democratic voter base to the point they voted Trump, Third party, or stayed home.  Sanders was a republican plant in the democrat party wether he knew it or not cause he did a masterful job of throwing that party into a tail spin and handing the win to republicans who masterfully divided and concurred.  To defeat hitler it had to be done on 2 fronts.  The 2 fronts to defeat the democrat party was actually 3 fronts for the republicans this election cycle.  They were the sanders front, the trump front, and the establishment front.  Republicans have the white house, the senate, the house, State governor bodies, supreme court.  It was masterful in reality.

    Nope Sanders lost the primary by 4 million votes.  The dems didn't want him.  Sanders would have turned more of the country red then Clinton did.  Blue Collar workers don't want to pay for the have nots and the have nots kids college.  Sanders would have turned places like Nevada, Colorado, and many other states red.