Jump to content

BOHICA

Members

  • Joined

  • Last visited

View Profile Find content

Posts posted by BOHICA

    15 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

    they simply cannot understand that if a corporation provides 20% of the taxes needed to build or repair infrastructure, and gov suddenly decides to deduct it to 10%, that other tax payers will need to make up that lost money. or, as we're seeing now, the infrastructure starts to crumble. all the while the corporation is making money hand over fist and laughing all the way to the bank. it blows my mind. it's rww mentality and the corporations love it.

    What happen to the tax moneys the govt takes from the 1000 employees that pay in from good paying jobs that would have otherwise left?

    News channels and papers and msgazines for at least the next four years have become trumps tweet tellers.  That is what they will report on.  Trump will tweet and they will have their panels of political "experts" discuss the tweet in depth.  Since trump was treated so unfairly during this campaign he wont give them the time of day.

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    I see new york advertising campaign on tv alott called "startup New York"  or something like that....  its like no taxes for business for many years.  Wonder if liberals think that tax incentive is a good deal.

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    3 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

    if I remember I thought WA had to give extra heavy incentives to keep boing from going to a southern state with n o right to work laws to manufacture the new wing . in fact I thought the state and even the fed brought boing to court over the deal. something like that it has been like 6 or 7 yrs  

    Ya.  Washington has a pretty powerful democrat congressional representation.  Lots of picketting going on a few years back when some dreamliners were going to SC.

    1 minute ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

    Research? Go fire up the google guy... You don't even know what they said in that article. Their stock took a hit to boot. That was a WTO ruling btw. But yes, fire up google. I have a feeling you don't understand much in there. But you lived in Seattle hahahahahahah so you must understand the situation?

    1bbr8l.jpg

    https://www.google.com/amp/www.forbes.com/sites/scotthamilton5/2016/11/28/wto-boeing-ruling-gives-airbus-good-pr-but-its-meaningless/?client=safari

    2 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

    You posted an article that shows an American company taking a major hit because the state of WA did what every fucking other state would do (and should...) and your giddy about it because the American company just happens to be located in WA... Yeah I am outclassed by you... Lol stupid. 

    1bbr8l.jpg

    Do some research kid.  

    Airbus and boeing have been sueing each other in the world court for years.  Boeing has said this wont effect there bottom line and it will be appealed....

    boeing especially SC has worked lined up for years.  WA as well.

    3 minutes ago, xtralettucetomatoe580 said:

    Are you cheerleading for Europe being able to stick it to an American manufacturer that builds their planes in America at, might I add, a significant industry protection fee by the US tax payer? Because they said WA, you think this is sticking it to liberals I am guessing. SMH.

     

    By the way cutting a levy on gross receipt is a tax cut... Not very liberal of WA haha. 

    Did you read the article? 

    Dude I lived in washington in Seattle for 4 years...  That side of the cascades decides the political policies of the state and its all about liberalism.  It decides the politics for the whole state due to population.  Washington subsidized the shit out of Boeing to keep it out of the dirty south.......

    Im not against subsidizing companies by the way as they are just tax cuts in the end.  See the thing is the liberals can beat on Trump for Carrier and Pence on there tax breaks if that is what it got to get them to stay but when ultra liberal states do it, it is for the betterment of the state and area.....

    Moving along son as you can only outclass MC lately on this forum.

    11 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

    Clinton is not relevant anymore. She lost, the end. Now the spotlight is on Trump and the republican party he attached himself too. Watch his reaction when he is so use to being boss and ordering a change and it happens instantly at Trumpco.....it takes years in Congress. Hes gonna flip out

    Clintons will always be relevant in politics.  Bill is a former president and hillary won the popular vote.  The majority of the democratic party still hasnt accepted the election results

    11 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

    Everything Trump tosses out is a distraction for something else he wants no one seeing him doing. Hey look over there....over here....over there.

    I think its to fuck with you clinton supporters.  Its like a string and a cat.  He just throws it out and you guys jump on it like ragging animals snd then he flicks the string over there and you clinton guys leap.  Election is over and he is still playing you guys cause its so easy

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    One of the last transmission line builds I was on cost around a million a mile.  3.5 mil to recount the entire state of wisconsin seems kind of cheap.  If the Hand counting goes through it would be astronomical figures especially with all the overtime.  Stein better have deeper pockets if she truely wants a hand recount..  Lots and lots of worker hours would need to go into it and Alot of hour verifying it.  It would be a good xmas bonus though for those involved in the recount.

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    10 minutes ago, Ez ryder said:

    I deff se a lot of gov trucks like Ram on the road. then u see them up for sale on the GSA site with well under 100k on them for cheep . run that shit till it is dead . U know they are buying yrs of parts with every fleet cuz they sell pallets of parts on gsa for vehicles still in production . GSA is a huge hole of cash waste   

    Ya it seems the forest service runs alot of Rams 2500's and 3500's and changes them out often in my state and they are all made in Mexico.  Its a pretty powerful negiotiating tool if GSA came out and said we will only buy vehicles model lines that are manufactured in the US and the US only and the manufactures ears would perk up an as I can only imagine how lucrative a sale to the government as a vehicle....  Even such things as a school district....  I know the school district in my area runs quit a few ford cars...  Many built in Mexico.  One swoop of the pen and Trump could let state and local gov't know that they must purchase american built autos or risk losing federal funding.  

    ·

    Edited by BOHICA

    Trump needs to head to GSA head office the day of after he is sworn in and let them know they have a week to get a list of approved vehicles built in the USA only on the only approved vehicle list for the use of government funds to purchase.  Any vehicles such as the Ford Focus even still built the the US but if there is plans to move its production to mexico the Government needs to stop purchasing those.  Then let those manufactures know the models that don't qualify for government fund and the government wont purchases foreign made autos

    Pretty simple.....  As I see alot of vehicles in my area that have gov plates that are built in Mexico...  The forest service in my area is fond of Ram HD pickups which are only made in Mexico.  No way a gov agency should be buying vehicles built in Mexico.