Jump to content
Check your account email address ×

Ebsell

Members
  • Posts

    2,438
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Ebsell

  1. 1 minute ago, Highmark said:

    Sure, they are the ones "chosen" for the quotas.  I've never seen an American farmer who was against our crop insurance program that basically guarantees them income either.   Sure wish my business was backed by a govt guarantee of income.  :lmao:

    The quota I believe is controlled by the Milk marketing board. A group of people voted in by the farmers 

  2. 1 hour ago, Angry ginger said:

    good for the farmer but not good for the consumer-  which is more important?  Quotas certainly help the quota owner  I know a guy who just got picked in the lottery for maple taps in QC and that will pretty much fund his retirement as he will be able to grow the tap count going forward but where does it benefit the consumer.  

    For the amount it costs me in the run of a week I'm willing to pay it. 

  3. 57 minutes ago, Momorider said:

    My Nieces ex husband was a recruiter she met him wanting to join and did tours in both Afganistan and Iraq since, it's just another assignment :news: Snake was in Germany for years if I remember :dunno: doubt he recruited there 

    Doubt he seen conflict there either. 

    • Like 1
  4. 12 minutes ago, Edmo said:

    You're allowed an opinion on whatever you want. But to bash someone that didn't serve, when you didn't either, is weak IMO.

    I would have thought anyone who served would look down on anyone who dodged the draft more than anyone. Back when the draft was in place draft dodgers weren't to popular to say the least. 

  5. 3 minutes ago, Anler said:

    Thats how they are packaging it up to sell to the unwashed masses. Great idea right? But in reality it is theft. If it was found that a pharmaceutical company was involved in pushing prescription narcotics thru street dealers do you think the govt would take all of the companies assets? One can argue that the govt is complicit in the actual crime and aggressive about the forfeiture. Thats not freedom brah, no matter what you think about the means the revenue was obtained. Thats theft and it opens a door that could allow for  unlimited avenues of forfeiture. What about the victims of El Chapos crimes? should they deserve first claims at restitution for the murdered family members? Or do you think the US govt deserves that money first? 

    I agree it should go to victims and not the US Government. I'm just fishing for momo and I got a bite  :lol:bottom line is anytime the Government profits off of forfeitures it opens a very slippery slope  no denying that. They might seize momo's helicopter and sell it  :true:

  6. 1 minute ago, Anler said:

    Thats how they are packaging it up to sell to the unwashed masses. Great idea right? But in reality it is theft. If it was found that a pharmaceutical company was involved in pushing prescription narcotics thru street dealers do you think the govt would take all of the companies assets? One can argue that the govt is complicit in the actual crime and aggressive about the forfeiture. Thats not freedom brah, no matter what you think about the means the revenue was obtained. Thats theft and it opens a door that could allow for  unlimited avenues of forfeiture. What about the victims of El Chapos crimes? should they deserve first claims at restitution for the murdered family members? Or do you think the US govt deserves that money first? 

    The US Government is going to do whatever it wants. Same as always, after all they are basically the biggest crime syndicate in the world 

×
×
  • Create New...