-
Posts
62,984 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
178
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by f7ben
-
-
39 minutes ago, HSR said:
OK OP it's your thread , call it like you want.
Read the first line in the thread for the definition of "obsessed"
Just correcting your piss poor understanding of the subject and trying to prevent you from looking like an absolute retard like usual ….sorry
-
40 minutes ago, HSR said:
This discussion was rigged,it was a totally fake discussion. Ben really won. He will hold a presser soon on TBP to announce how he OWNED all the stupid retard moron cocksuckers at Freedomsledder. Attaboys and bum pats will follow along with a full lips on lips gobsmacker from Woolie
We ask that you all remain peaceful throughout this time.
You are really obsessed man , very sad
- 4
-
Can’t be a simpler
-
Normalizing is a system designed to maintain it
- 1
-
Turbocharging is a system designed to exceed that rated hp
- 1
-
Engines are certified and given a rated power at sea level
that is a fact
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Crnr2Crnr said:
the lack of lug flick discussion in this conversation is disappointing to say the least
You weren’t even here for that noob , you probably weren’t even a gleam in your daddies eye then. Total noob
- 2
-
59 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:
Performance modifications can be done to enhance air flow, fuel flow, fuel/air mixture, spark management, and combustion efficiency/propagation/compression/valve timing. Regardless of those modifications, unlike with turbocharging, the tuner is still working with the available atmospheric pressure.
And in the case of skidoos original turbo they were only working with the original atmosphere also
-
1 hour ago, HSR said:
It's rated at whatever elevation the dyno is at, then they use a correction factor for sea level to make dyno's all on a level standard playing field for comparison sake only. Actual hp in the real world is whatever the sled can produce at whatever elevation they are being operated at. The turbocharged models generally make more at altitude than N/A models.
If all dynos were at sea level a correction factor wouldn't be needed.
Nope , power is sae certified on engines
You fail again retard
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, HSR said:
Tell that to the guys riding at 8000ft where one sled makes almost 40 actual hp more.
Sleds don't have a correction factor button, just a turbo. We don't ride dynos Ben.
Where is power rated and certified? We aren’t talking about field variables in a discussion of defining terms.
-
3 minutes ago, HSR said:
Ben does a turbo normalized engine have more or less gyroscopic effect than a turbocharged engine or does the correction factor negate that????
Depends on the mounting locating , angular momentum and size of turbo!!!
Id say yes!!!
-
7 minutes ago, HSR said:
So the N/A 850's rated output at 8000ft is 126hp
The turbo 850's rated output at 8000ft is 172 hp
Thanks for playing.
Nothing to back up your made up 100 year old definition regarding 1 atmosphere of boost required. Just more
They don’t rate power at 8000’ you retarded faggot you are so fucking stupid
-
Just now, HSR said:
You started it with this quote and have YET to back it up in ANY way shape or form. Just a bunch of name calling and stupid typing. How about a link from ANYWHERE that says this,,,,,,,
Turbocharged has a specific definition and that means it makes a pressure above 1 atmosphere.
Until you can, yes made up definitions are allowed as per you.
My definition is accurate as it’s been understood for 100 years. Your very own definition of turbocharged confirmed that.
“A system designed to increase engine power beyond rated output”
That is not what a normalized system does
-
I mean if we are gonna just make up our own definitions of shit then fuck yah!!!
-
2 hours ago, ActionfigureJoe said:
It still comes down to basic principle of more oxygen means more fuel which gets more power. Period.
So then porting a head is turbocharging??? COOL!!!!
-
42 minutes ago, ActionfigureJoe said:
Floyd would be as helpless as a child.
She’s 140lb chick who could not hurt him if she hit him with a ball bat. He would literally kill her with his hands if he wanted. Are you seriously fucking retarded? You might be
-
11 minutes ago, sleepybrew said:
holly's kick to her face was epic
It probably wouldn’t have hurt Floyd
-
11 minutes ago, toslow said:
If anyone of the opponents went full out on Jake, it would be a slaughter.
everyone so pulled back
It’s exhibition for money , not real fighting. The Paul kid is a decent boxer but you’re correct. He would have been destroyed by all of them in a real fight
- 1
-
30 minutes ago, awful knawful said:
Yes, you for one, and anyone that agrees with you.
I’d imagine that is the way you would see things and I’m not disappointed
-
Skidoo released a turbonormalized engine the first year , the following year it could be considered turbo charged and it actually increased rated engine power. There are a few real fucking idiots here.
-
4 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:
Least I have hair you bird-beaked, starfish-faced noodle arm!!111!!!
Neal
That’s not nice Neal
-
3 minutes ago, NaturallyAspirated said:
10x better than what the fuck you are!
Neal
UR a Hairy OT style cunt!!!!
-
Just now, NaturallyAspirated said:
That’s u idiot!
Neal
I SAID UR A CUNT!!!!
-
2025 858 Stroker
in Current Events
Posted
I honestly can’t wait to ride a catalyst but I don’t have high hopes. Polaris has done so well I can’t see this being better. Maybe? I hope so